Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MizSterious
That is interesting! Guess she isn't the nice, sweet, innocent that her family is making her out to be.
35 posted on 05/13/2004 7:33:11 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04 -- Losing is not an Option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: PhiKapMom; MEG33; cyncooper; Howlin; Peach
It's an odd thing. Last night while channel surfing, I stopped on Fox News for awhile. Greta was on, and interviewing one of the interrogators at the prison. Did you see this? HE said he had not seen any of this during his stint there which included the earlier part of the time when these things happened. He also said none of his interpretors saw it either, and that for real interrogation, you had to have interpretors.

He claimed it had to have been a small clique who were not authorized to work in this way, or even that they were doing this at times when they knew no one else would be around because they knew it would get them in trouble. He seemed to question whether or not it was for interrogation or something else--without quite saying so.

So here's the odd part. Some who saw the new pictures/videos said they thought it looked like someone was trying to make porn films. This "Lindie" person was said to have been taped having sex with several U.S. military men, in fact. These new pictures/videos are said to contain more of this kind of thing than of the so-called abuse.

Now I'm looking for my tinfoil hat, because I can't help but wonder if that's exactly what they were doing: creating porn to sell on the internet, which is very lucrative.

37 posted on 05/13/2004 8:07:20 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson