Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson; Travis McGee
Nope. I'm pretty sure it's a bad idea.

I don't think women belong in combat, or in "coed" prisons. It's just asking for trouble.

What we see here is just a small example of just how stupid it is to put some idea of "equality" ahead of common horse sense.
36 posted on 05/13/2004 12:49:36 AM PDT by Trinity_Tx (Most of our so-called reasoning consists in finding arguments for going on believin as we already do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Trinity_Tx
I don't think women belong in combat, or in "coed" prisons. It's just asking for trouble.

The purpose of putting women in the service in these siuations is paying dividends for the America hating socialists who pushed this agenda during the Clinton years..

The first thing Clinton did as president was to allow homosexuals to stay in the military. Also GI Jane was pioneered and now we are paying the price.

What the army wants are heterosexual males in their late teens and early twenties who are in god physical shape.

There is a reason the armed services never wanted gays and women near front line combat. There is enough of a problem fighting a war without these other distractions. - Tom

219 posted on 05/13/2004 7:02:01 AM PDT by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb republicans. - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson