Skip to comments.
Fired EMT Sues After Refusing to Transport Woman for Abortion
LifeNews.com ^
| 5/11/04
| Maria Gallagher
Posted on 05/12/2004 6:15:26 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
"This is a case where an employer fired an employee for acting in accordance with her religious beliefs by refusing to become a participant in an abortion," I guess freedom of religion is only valid if it condones murdering babies.
1
posted on
05/12/2004 6:15:26 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
This article is very strange. First of all, why did a woman need an ambulance to transport her to an abortion clinic? Second, why did a DRIVER need the personal details of someone's medical information? Very odd.
2
posted on
05/12/2004 6:17:51 PM PDT
by
cyborg
To: wagglebee
I hope somebody else hires her ASAP. She has ethics and a conscience.
3
posted on
05/12/2004 6:17:52 PM PDT
by
livius
To: cyborg
One of my daughters was a paramedic. Among certain groups (welfare recipients) calling an ambulance is as normal as calling a taxi would be for the rest of us. The fact that transportation use for non-urgent proceedures is technically forbidden and ambulance companies do not get reimbursed by either the federal or local governments for such services doesn't matter to people who have never had to pay for a thing in their lives.
I would assume that the person in question dialed 911 and announced that she had an emergency, and then told the ambulance personnel that she "needed" to go to the hospital for an abortion.
BTW, there are usually two people on an ambulance, and one of them functions as the driver. It might be an EMT and a paramedic, or any combination thereof, depending on local requirements. But they are both professionals, and usually either one can function as the driver.
4
posted on
05/12/2004 6:23:35 PM PDT
by
livius
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: wagglebee
Now if this was a Muslim refusing to transport girls to school, you just know the ACLU attorneys would be falling all over themselves to defend HIS "religious freedom"...
6
posted on
05/12/2004 6:24:39 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(I'd question John Kerry's patriotism if I thought for a moment he had any...)
To: Prime Choice
That would be a very interesting scenario indeed, pitting the ACLU directly against their good friends in NOW.
7
posted on
05/12/2004 6:28:06 PM PDT
by
Tabi Katz
To: livius
Wonder if the Welfare Recipient's name was Lisa Madigian?
8
posted on
05/12/2004 6:29:59 PM PDT
by
dts32041
("Liberty is not America's gift to the world, it is God's gift to humanity" George W Bush 28 Jan 2003)
To: wagglebee
It sounds entirely possible to me that this ambulance driver saved the woman's lifde by refusing to take her to an abortion clinic when she was in pain and needed better medical treatment. The call from the hospital personnel to have an ambulance transport the woman away from their care is suspect.
To: cyborg
First of all, why did a woman need an ambulance to transport her to an abortion clinic? Man, "poor" people get transported to the emergency room all the time to treat headaches and hangnails. All they have to do is dial 911 and here they come. It's illegal for 911 to refuse aid to anyone.
"Poor" people consider ambulances to be free taxis.
10
posted on
05/12/2004 6:40:57 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
To: wagglebee
This is dumb, if the person that told her knew that she was just going to use it for an abortion then why did they even bother to send an ambulance. Wonder what happened to the person requesting the ambulance. What were the severe abdominal pain, and did what happened to the baby?
To: cpforlife.org
Thought you might be interested.
To: wagglebee
"our client should not have been punished for exercising her sincerely-held religious beliefs,"
Great, and if we are injured, should we have to worry that your next holier than thou client will be a Seventh Day Adventist who won't give us a transfusion?
13
posted on
05/12/2004 7:10:13 PM PDT
by
cavan
To: E. Pluribus Unum
true...I forgot :(
14
posted on
05/12/2004 7:11:18 PM PDT
by
cyborg
To: livius
thanks for the fill-in... sheesh you know I forget myself and how people behave.
15
posted on
05/12/2004 7:12:10 PM PDT
by
cyborg
To: narses; Polycarp IV; NYer
Can you ping your lists? Interesting article.
16
posted on
05/12/2004 7:12:23 PM PDT
by
kstewskis
("Political correctness is intellectual terrorism..." M.G.)
To: kstewskis; .45MAN; AAABEST; AKA Elena; al_c; american colleen; Angelus Errare; annalex; Annie03; ...
PING!
17
posted on
05/12/2004 7:24:39 PM PDT
by
Polycarp IV
(PRO-LIFE orthodox Catholic--without exception, without compromise, without apology. Any questions?)
To: cyborg
In August of that year, Adamson, 35, responded to a non-emergency call at Mt. Sinai Hospital. There, she was instructed to transport a woman to an abortion center near Cook County Hospital to have an abortion. It sounds like an ambulance was needed to transport the woman from one hospital to another.
18
posted on
05/12/2004 7:28:24 PM PDT
by
Dianna
To: wagglebee
This story makes no sense. The transport was
from a hospital to an abortion clinic. If it was a medical emergency the patient would have stayed at the hospital. The abdominal pain angle makes no sense. In that case, the patient would not be transferred to a lower level of care.
This sounds like patient dumping or someone in need of a taxi ride. Even disregarding religious considerations, this call should have been refused. This was an abuse of the system.
19
posted on
05/12/2004 7:32:20 PM PDT
by
Canticle_of_Deborah
(The day the Church abandons her universal tongue is the day before she returns to the catacombs-PXII)
To: Dianna
thanks... hospital transfers are usually done in ambulettes,etc. I think. It's not her job to be making such judgments about a patient's condition seeing as how she is not a OB-GYN. Flame away if anyone must.
20
posted on
05/12/2004 7:33:39 PM PDT
by
cyborg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson