Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Snuffington
I happen to think Bishop Donald Wuerl of Pittsburgh has it right:

"While one has a clear and grave obligation to vote against legislation that bolsters abortion, the view of refusing Communion to politicians who support keeping abortion legal is not part of the pastoral tradition of the Church."

14 posted on 06/04/2004 7:02:29 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
"While one has a clear and grave obligation to vote against legislation that bolsters abortion, the view of refusing Communion to politicians who support keeping abortion legal is not part of the pastoral tradition of the Church."

Pastoral decisions cannot be applied without an understanding of those to whom you are the pastor. And therefore, I certainly would believe this is something best left to the decision of the individual bishop.

That does not mean that anyone has to agree with him, or that no one should try to persuade him to change a pastoral direction. They just have to recognize that this is an area left to his own authority. And that lax disciplinarians can still be very orthodox bishops.

This is fundamentally different from those clerics who refuse to teach the faith, and scandalize the faithful.

16 posted on 06/04/2004 7:37:22 PM PDT by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

I think many Bishops are against the idea of withholding Communion from the pro-abortion politicians because they don't want the politicians to have any reason to be a martyr in the eyes of the uninformed faithful. This whole situation shows just how much education about Church teaching is needed, even on the part of some priests who are still clinging to the Seamless Garment idea because that is what gave the pro-abortion Democrats cover in the late 80s and 90s


17 posted on 06/04/2004 7:43:30 PM PDT by SuziQ (Bush in 2004/Because we Must!!! (Bombard))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson