I'm getting into a fouler-by-the-minute mood. If he wants credit credit for breaking the story - despite the fact it was reported in in January - then I'm happy to give it to him, and DEMAND HE TESTIFY BEFORE THAT DISGUSTING KANGAROO COURT THAT PASSES FOR THE ARMED FORCES COMMITTEE, AND EXPLAIN HIS PART IN THE ILLEGAL LEAK OF EVIDENCE IN A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION.
Why hasn't he testified? If this were really about Rumy covering up the fact there were photos from congress (which we now know was a lie) then why aren't Lawrence and Hackworth testifying?