To: Chieftain
Oh man...I get their point, but this is BAD. I don't think they mean "we're glad us soldiers are dying." I think they mean that while the gubmint didnt want the coffin photos getting out, these pics are MUCH worse...the coffin photos are tame by comparison.
9 posted on
05/10/2004 12:13:44 PM PDT by
Huck
(In the Soviet Union, the Admin Moderators ruled.)
To: Huck
My take?
They/it is saying...
It's better (easier) to see dead American soldiers, than naked abused iraqi's (Who may have been responsible for killing Americans..)
Sick.
><
12 posted on
05/10/2004 12:26:55 PM PDT by
CygnusXI
(Where's that dang Meteor already?)
To: Huck
I think they mean that while the gubmint didnt want the coffin photos getting out, these pics are MUCH worse...the coffin photos are tame by comparison.I can see that point as well. HOWEVER... the editorial boards of the Cincinatti Post and the Newsweak as well as PMSNBC, should exercise SOME degree of sensitivity towards those who have lost a loved one in this effort.
This was published KNOWING it would cut both ways and without respect for our war dead. The editors of the above need to hear from the public regarding this.
15 posted on
05/10/2004 12:37:25 PM PDT by
Chieftain
(To all who serve and support those who serve - thank you!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson