[robertpaulsen]

You're being a nit-picking pest. Both the author and I were talking about drugs in that section. I thought that was understood.

"The Ninth Circuit, affectionately known as the Ninth Circus -- THE most overturned lower court in the U.S. -- went against all previous lower court commerce clause rulings dealing with the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 with their decision."

Better?

[tacticalogic]

Apparently, then we're talking about the drug clause, and not the commerce clause. Where exactly is that "drug clause" in the Constutitution again? Now that you've had to back off the width adjustment on that brush you're using, you'll just have to spin a little faster to cover the same area, I guess.

[tacticalogic]

Both the author and I were talking about drugs in that section. I thought that was understood.

And if it's "understood" that the both you and the author are talking about drugs, and the CSA in particular, and not the Commerce Clause in general, why are you referencing Wickard v. Filburn?