Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
Both the author and I were talking about drugs in that section. I thought that was understood.

And if it's "understood" that the both you and the author are talking about drugs, and the CSA in particular, and not the Commerce Clause in general, why are you referencing Wickard v. Filburn?

14 posted on 05/10/2004 12:10:13 PM PDT by tacticalogic (Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
Simple. Different section.

Keep up with the class or we're going to have to hold you back a year.

Why don't you try adding something to the discussion rather than playing these stupid "gotcha" games? Too hard?

15 posted on 05/10/2004 12:21:42 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson