Posted on 05/09/2004 6:48:01 PM PDT by TigerTrails
DESPITE US expectations, Australia would resist ANZUS treaty obligations and not offer military backing to a US war with Beijing over Taiwan, defence and China experts warned yesterday.
But the Howard Government has not sent that message to Washington, with ties between Canberra and the US reaching a new high in the wake of the free trade deal and the war on terror.
The Future Summit conference, sponsored by The Weekend Australian, was told yesterday that if China reacted to Taiwan's latest push for independence with an invasion and the US retaliated, this would be a "disaster" for Australia.
Australia faced an unpalatable choice: say no to the US and "irreparably" damage the alliance, or say yes and have billions of dollars in investment in natural gas and resources wiped by China in a post-conflict phase.
"I think Australians underestimate just how much our hopes for a peaceful and prosperous region are at risk if US-China relations crash over Taiwan," Australian Strategic Policy Institute director Hugh White warned.
"United States decision-makers take it absolutely for granted that in a US-China conflict over Taiwan, Australia would provide active and concrete support, and they've got some reasons to think that," Mr White said.
Article 4 of the ANZUS treaty obliged Australia to support the US in the event it had to go to Taiwan's aid.
"In circumstances in which Taiwan had materially contributed to the crisis by what you might call conduct jeopardising the status quo, and that is by far the most likely situation ... I think even the Howard Government would be very reluctant to join (the US)."
Mr White said he believed it would help US decision-making if Washington knew how strongly Australia wanted such a conflict avoided.
Renewed fears of a flare-up over Taiwan have followed the re-election of President Chen Shui-bian's Democratic Progressive Party in March.
Beijing fears a planned referendum on a new constitution pledged by Mr Chen could see Taipei move towards a declaration of independence.
Australia adheres to a one-China policy that recognises Taiwan as part of China.
Foreign Minister Alexander Downer has cautioned Taiwan against any push for independence that might provoke retaliation from Beijing.
Australian National University Strategic and Defence Studies Centre advisory board chair Paul Dibb said none of Washington's other allies, including Japan, South Korea, India and Britain, would support a war against China.
Professor Dibb said relations with the US could be damaged irreparably if Australia did not go to Taiwan's aid, but equally China would wipe off billions of dollars in Australian investment if Canberra were involved.
Australia-China Business Council chairman - and former Howard government minister - Warwick Smith said Australia would risk its financial future in providing troops for such a conflict. "It's not a bad thing to say no sometimes," Mr Smith said.
I recall the Churcill quote: "..we've already established what kind of woman you are, now we're merely negotiating price".
Surely most Australians are not this sort.
Likewise, the U.S. wants to avoid this conflict. That's why we've put all possible diplomatic pressure onto Taiwan to prevent Taipei from nuking Beijing.
...But what China does on its own towards Taiwan is beyond our control to prevent.
Make China mad or turn their back on America, who if it wasn't for, the Australians would now all be speaking Japanese - that is the ones who were still left alive after the butchering was over.
My guess is they'll go with Communist China because as we're finding out, the 'free world' doesn't care anymore that WE saved their collective butts in WWII!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.