So it was just a political ploy to harm Bush
1 posted on
05/09/2004 3:04:12 PM PDT by
wagglebee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: wagglebee
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....................
To: wagglebee
Sounds like she's 'easy'.
To: wagglebee
Actually, ratting on an agent makes no sense for the Bush camp..... somebody else did it.
To: wagglebee
This guy gives me the frigging creeps.
6 posted on
05/09/2004 3:11:07 PM PDT by
MegaSilver
(Training a child in red diapers is the cruelest and most unusual form of abuse.)
To: wagglebee
"in fact, there is some personal discretion that is allowed when you are in personal relationships," Wilson told WABC Radio's Steve Malzberg." Well heck, maybe Valerie told the person who leaked the info during a heavy make out session with him. Who says there had to be only one "personal relationship".
9 posted on
05/09/2004 3:11:28 PM PDT by
sd-joe
To: wagglebee
Some "covert" CIA operative she is!
10 posted on
05/09/2004 3:14:10 PM PDT by
FairOpinion
(If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
To: wagglebee
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeew.
11 posted on
05/09/2004 3:15:48 PM PDT by
atomicpossum
(Hey, I wouldn't touch Camryn Manheim's uterus on a bet.)
To: wagglebee
My oldest daughter has a top secret security clearance, and even if I had one, unless I was working in her department, she is not allowed to tell me anything about her work. "Need to know" only.
This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, especially if her supposed cover was that important.
12 posted on
05/09/2004 3:16:14 PM PDT by
stylin_geek
(Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
To: wagglebee
"heavy make-out session"
Ahhh, LALALALALALALA
Too much information!
13 posted on
05/09/2004 3:16:45 PM PDT by
highlandbreeze
(....that others may live.)
To: wagglebee
What a coincidence, I also told all the (sl)easy women I dated (in my bachelor days) that I was a secret agent.
Not that it was true, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn once!
14 posted on
05/09/2004 3:18:07 PM PDT by
The Duke
To: FBD; MeekOneGOP; Mia T; Mudboy Slim; sultan88; Treasa
Bush administration Uraniumgate accuser Joe Wilson defended his wife Valerie Plame on Sunday for blowing her CIA cover during what he described as "a heavy make out session" shortly after the couple first met in the 1990s.Seems that Miss Valerie wasn't exactly the upstanding, dedicated agent the Left purported her to be.
15 posted on
05/09/2004 3:18:25 PM PDT by
jla
To: wagglebee
Bush administration Uraniumgate accuser Joe Wilson defended his wife Valerie Plame on Sunday for blowing her CIA cover during what he described as "a heavy make out session" shortly after the couple first met in the 1990s. Looks like he doesn't have much respect for his wife's reputation does he? I know I wouldn't want my husband to blab that to the world.
16 posted on
05/09/2004 3:18:31 PM PDT by
areafiftyone
(Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
To: wagglebee
Undercover interruptus?
18 posted on
05/09/2004 3:19:58 PM PDT by
Use It Or Lose It
(JohnFKerry: A Bad Bottle of French Whine topped with a $1,000 haircut)
To: wagglebee
"" 'Well, I had all the requisite security clearances and, in fact, there is some personal discretion that is allowed when you are in personal relationships' Wilson told WABC Radio's Steve Malzberg."
Utter BS.
Maureen Dowd let this little tidbit slip out in one of her columns a few months ago and I was surprised no one picked up on it. I sent an email to Boortz about it hoping he would bring it up on his show but he never did.
I was cleared for Secret in my time in the military and anyone who has been granted a security clearance knows that classified information is given out on a NEED TO KNOW basis only. It doesn't matter how high the clearance of the recipient is. This was a clear compromise of security. There is NO leeway given to persons because of their "relationship". She violated federal law by outing herself.
19 posted on
05/09/2004 3:20:23 PM PDT by
dandi
("No nation ever taxed it's way into prosperity." - R.L.)
To: wagglebee
"Well, I had all the requisite security clearances and, in fact, there is some personal discretion that is allowed when you are in personal relationships," There is?? I can see how one might think that media folks are all ninnies, but does Wilson actually think that the public will digest that one?
20 posted on
05/09/2004 3:23:11 PM PDT by
maxwell
(Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
To: wagglebee
The man is a blithering ass. That just about covers it.
To: wagglebee
I think it is time for a couple of polygraph test - Wilson and his wife. Someone is trying to "hawk" some movie rights.
To: wagglebee
revealed her CIA indentity in a moment of heated passion on their third or fourth date Hmm. I've often thought about telling girls I was with the CIA, but that would have been sometime before the point of "heated passion."
24 posted on
05/09/2004 3:28:37 PM PDT by
Larry Lucido
(If we comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable, do we then reafflict the newly comfortable?)
To: wagglebee
"Well, I had all the requisite security clearances and, in fact, there is some personal discretion that is allowed when you are in personal relationships,"
This i crap! I don't believe that for a minute. Just because you have a clearance, doe NOT mean you have the "need to know" justification. And if he did have the need to know, the briefing would come from a security agent once the needed background investigation was complete, not from some hot honey in the back of a car.
Out of one side of his mouth, he wants us to believe how senstitive the information about his wife's duties were - that she as greatly harmed by the disclosure of her name. Then out of the other side, she was so careless to devulge her work to someone she has "had a personall relationship with". What does that mean, you give somebody a Lewinsky, that means you can relay senistive and classified intel information.
Did she think about the number of lives she was potentially placing in danger by violating her oath. She did not kno for sure if he was a spy or not - that's what background investigations are for. I remember a case in the 1980s when a US military officer married a German woman and lived with her for more than 10 years. She was a sleeper agent and worked for the East Germans as a spy. Only after the damagae was done did he find out who she was and what her motivation was.
As Stossel says "give me a break!"
26 posted on
05/09/2004 3:29:23 PM PDT by
tang-soo
To: wagglebee
Joe Wilson? Mrs. Wilson?
Didn't they VIOLATE anti-Nepotism laws by the Mrs.'s putting Jow as the head of that "Investigation" trip to Niger?
28 posted on
05/09/2004 3:30:22 PM PDT by
Anti-Bush Hater
(Assembling a bunch of hippies and paid liars to regurgitate commie lies is not an "Investigation")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson