Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: R. Scott
"the difference between “should” and “shall”."

You're being obtuse.

" Please explain to me how the use of the Article 15 document shows that Mr. Rumsfeld said what you claim."

Not only Rumsfeld, but Bush too, because they have said nothing to the contrary. It's trivial that if they had, the Article 15 would be dropped.

62 posted on 05/10/2004 6:52:57 AM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets
"the difference between “should” and “shall”."

You're being obtuse.


There is nothing obtuse about the meaning of words.

It's trivial that if they had, the Article 15 would be dropped.

Article 15s are often used by the Chain of Command as a CYA measure
68 posted on 05/10/2004 9:22:48 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson