Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mo1
She did look a little pale after the hearing

Rumsfeld immediatelypicked up on her reference and was very blunt in his response. Indeed, the entire statement he made is wrapped around the simple principle of "Oh really, how the &^%$ did you know before me?"

I expect an internal investigation has started, and that dumbass in the crusty pants suit just made the focus a whole lot easier. They're going to rip into every Clinton-connected employee like nobody's business now.

It also sounds as if that dingbat didn't get her ducks in a row on this one--she has been inelegant and revealing in the past, but not this freaked out after a misstep such as this.

37 posted on 05/07/2004 9:04:16 PM PDT by lavrenti (I'm not bad, just misunderstood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: lavrenti
Thanks for the synopsis,I missed most of what happened this afternoon.

Hang the Hag from her cankles.
45 posted on 05/07/2004 9:07:10 PM PDT by Redcoat LI (What Is Man That Thou Art Mindful of Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: lavrenti
I expect an internal investigation has started, and that dumbass in the crusty pants suit just made the focus a whole lot easier. They're going to rip into every Clinton-connected employee like nobody's business now.

I sure hope so ..

I also want to who the Aid to the Active Member of Congress was that Curt Weldon mentioned today

48 posted on 05/07/2004 9:08:29 PM PDT by Mo1 (Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: lavrenti
Rumsfeld immediatelypicked up on her reference and was very blunt in his response.

Interesting that Rumsfeld would gather more information than the "fact finding investigatory panel" of 1/4 of the entire United States Senate.

It's amazing what you can learn when you ask questions to find out information, and when you listen to people to understand what they are saying, rather than grandstanding to the cameras for a shot at the veep spot on the ticket.

64 posted on 05/07/2004 9:19:25 PM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Question Liberal Authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: lavrenti
It's their arrogance and blind rage .. it will trip you up every time.
195 posted on 05/07/2004 10:26:25 PM PDT by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: lavrenti
***It also sounds as if that dingbat didn't get her ducks in a row on this one--she has been inelegant and revealing in the past, but not this freaked out after a misstep such as this.***

If the "smartassed woman in the world" keeps working in her underhanded way to harm President Bush, she is going to revealed as an enemy of the people.


341 posted on 05/08/2004 1:06:19 AM PDT by kitkat ("The democrats would rather win the WH than the war." - Tom DeLay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: lavrenti
I expect an internal investigation has started, and that dumbass in the crusty pants suit just made the focus a whole lot easier. They're going to rip into every Clinton-connected employee like nobody's business now.



We can only hope.
376 posted on 05/08/2004 7:15:46 AM PDT by Just Lori (I used to be a Democrat. Now, I'm an American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: lavrenti; Mo1; The Mayor; abner; Judith Anne; Redcoat LI; ovrtaxt; prairiebreeze; TomGuy; ...
Listen: Hitlery saying "The focus on the pictures being released is, with all due respect, missing the point." is absolutely, based on my research, incorrect. As I read the Geneva Convention, this belittling publicity against the individual prisoners involved is a greater violation than the actual humiliation which took place. I think this is a proper view by the GC, too. This publicity will hurt them long after their being naked will.

I honestly believe that CBS and others who were complicit in publicizing this could be liable under the GC for a War Crime, while the soldiers who committed the act are liable for far less severe penalty. But not only that, this interference with a criminal investigation may well absolve those who did the act itself from being able to be prosecuted. If that is the case, it will not be in our best interests, and again the publicizers are liable for the effect.

I will see if I can recover the GC research I did a few days ago and quote those passages which make my point, if after I read this whole thread I discover that no one else has done so.

I am very excited to have heard yesterday that Rummy, Meyers, etc., had not been privy to viewing the pictures until the need to come to the hearing had forced that. They were clearly not running the investigation and prosecution, and they had no involvement in it other than making sure that justice was going to be visited on the liable folks. I am not sure on what pretense even they would have been able to justify looking at sequestered evidence.

That there was an even greater criminal act being committed, the illegal release of evidence in a criminal matter, could really turn into a "WaterGate" type event if any investigative reporters really get onto this - depending, of course - on what they discover.

For the record, here is a picture of Hitlery "First to the microphone" after the hearing, courtesy of TomGuy: post#2317 yesterday's thread:

As was said: "Fox pulled away, but the bitch was making a press statement one flat minute after it ended!!"

2316 and 2319
Make the point the live threaders noticed Hitlery's problem reight away:

To: All
Whoa! Did you see Hillary blowing a "whew" just then? She looked shaken, like she'd been caught with the goods!
2,316 posted on 05/07/2004 2:39:13 PM EDT by arasina (So there.)

To: Peach; Dog; Howlin
Is it me or does Hellary look like she was just hit with a truck ... Very pale looking as she walked out hearing

She is on C-Span1 NOW
2,319 posted on 05/07/2004 2:39:48 PM EDT by Mo1 (Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)

421 posted on 05/08/2004 11:12:53 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson