Skip to comments.
Nervous Kerry to Dems: "Go Easy on Rumsfeld"; Repsonse: "Why are you trying to F**K me on this?"
www.crushkerry.com ^
| 5/7/04
| www.crushkerry.com
Posted on 05/07/2004 5:16:45 AM PDT by crushkerry
John Kerry burned the midnight oil on the phone with Democrat members of the Senate Armed Services Committee last night. He pleaded with them to go lightly on Donald Rumsfeld when the Secretary of Defense appears before them today at around noon. Rumsfeld is scheduled to answer their questions about allegations of abuse by US soldiers against Iraqi prisoners and the ensuing investigation.
The photos of those alleged cases of abuse have enraged the Arab world. And Democrat bigs on the Armed Services Committee have called for Rumsfleds head.
But according to our source inside the Kerry campaign, John Kerry badly wants the issue to go away. Kerry fears the longer the issue stays in the news, the greater the likelihood his controversial accusations of war crimes committed by US soldiers in Vietnam including his own will become an ancillary issue in the campaign for President. The 9-11 Commission is already going to discredit Bush in their report. If we push things too far, there is bound to be a backlash, our source told us. Tonights cable news talk shows were proof. Virtually every one of them ran footage of John Kerry in 1971 trashing his fellow veterans and admitting atrocities.
Our source told us that the Democrat Senate Caucus had originally planned to rake Rumsfeld over the coals at todays hearing, but that Kerry wanted them to tone it down. Kerry had heated phone conversations with at least two key Democrats on the Armed Services Committee, demanding to know of one, Why are you trying to fk me on this?
No word yet on whether Kerry was successful in persuading his fellow Democrats to go easy on Rumsfeld or not. I guess well just have to stay tuned to the hearings.
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fword; iraqipow; kerry; rumsfeld; sasc; warcrimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-158 next last
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
from Conservativegreatgrandma This is the way it should be. These Americans trying to keep us safe in Iraq have done nothing in comparison to what Horseface Kerry claims to have done in Viet Nam.Great Grandma. Wow. Congrats! :-) Kerry's has a dilemma. On the one hand he has admitted to committing atrocities while in the navy much worse than the recent pictures from the prison. On the other hand he delayed reporting these atrocities to his commanders. It was not until he was out of the navy, 8 months after he left Vietnam, that he publicly spoke of what he did & saw in Vietnam. To top if off, now he says he embellished the reports of atrocities because he was young when he said those things in 1971.
So, how can Kerry criticize the ARMY & Rummy? The ARMY , began an investigation before the story became public. Kerry waited several months to ever say anything.
Rummy did not personally commit the prisoner abuse, Kerry is on record under oath before congress IIRC saying he personally committed atrocities.
It does not surprise me that Kerry wants this story to go away. It reminds everyone what he said he did over there, & what he said when he got back. He wants the voters to focus on his heroism in action, not the fact he says he killed innocents. He wants the stuff he said & did when he got back to just go away.
101
posted on
05/07/2004 6:44:27 AM PDT
by
handy
To: PISANO
I doubt that the Committee will go EASY on the SecDef. It is NOT their jobPity the 'rats. The economy is gone as an issue so now all that got is to but heads with Rummy.
To: river rat
If Congress and the Arab world were enraged by the photos of prisoners... perhaps we should be showing more photos of the events of 9-11 and the dozens of other Arab Muslim acts of horror... Why should the American public be "protected" from THOSE photos... AMEN! Worth repeating!
103
posted on
05/07/2004 6:47:42 AM PDT
by
handy
To: Izzy Dunne
Interesting that a source privy to the phone calls would blab. That's because this is the leaked cover story for the real phone conversation, which probably went something like this:
"If you don't nail his nuts to the wall on this, I will do everything in my power to cause your political life, as you currently know it, to flat line, and there will be no attempts to resuscitate."
104
posted on
05/07/2004 6:57:09 AM PDT
by
wayoverontheright
(Hidetheweeniespeak-the native tongue of liberals.)
To: wirestripper
I agree. I'm sick and tired of this "fair and balanced" stuff, too.
Just give us the news -- straight reporting.
Yesterday, Cavuto (who I love) had Sheila Jackson Lee on his show!
If anyone is going to cause me to stop watching Fox, it's people like her (and Eleanor Clift, etc.) spewing the left's lies. She didn't even make sense!
Kept talking about "Bush's clock" and demanding Rummy resign.
Why would Neil give this dolt air time? I can only hope he does it for the same reason Rush does...to let the audience see for themselves how utterly stupid these liberals are.
105
posted on
05/07/2004 7:00:58 AM PDT
by
RottiBiz
(Help end Freepathons -- become a Monthly Donor.)
Comment #106 Removed by Moderator
To: jocon307
Why do they hate us, because they hate themselves
%%%
This applies to leftists as well.
107
posted on
05/07/2004 7:04:11 AM PDT
by
maica
(Member of Republican Attack Machine, RAM, previously known as the VRWC)
To: Mo1
The source did not say, so we don't know.
108
posted on
05/07/2004 7:04:23 AM PDT
by
crushkerry
(Visit www.crushkerry.com to see John Kerry's positions filleted - and to see our lovely spokesmodel))
To: wirestripper
Amen...
But alas, impossible to achieve a media focused on UNBIASED TRUTH..
The media is diseased to it's marrow...
The beast must first be destroyed and burned...
Perhaps then, something of value and truth can arise from the ashes...
Semper Fi
109
posted on
05/07/2004 7:06:20 AM PDT
by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek...But I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: faux_hog
I don't know if you're missing anything. This is just what our source told us. Our info is only as good as his or her info. And remember, Kerry is probably the only Democrat better off solely because of the subject matter, so it's a unique situation.
110
posted on
05/07/2004 7:06:25 AM PDT
by
crushkerry
(Visit www.crushkerry.com to see John Kerry's positions filleted - and to see our lovely spokesmodel))
To: Gellieman
Protecting America good
Language unbecoming a Presidential candidate bad
111
posted on
05/07/2004 7:07:41 AM PDT
by
motzman
(Kerry's Haircut: Operation Shear Shrek)
To: crushkerry
112
posted on
05/07/2004 7:08:18 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: crushkerry
He is trying to talk them out of their favorite sport.
They are like wolves, only much worse.
To: sauropod
time?
114
posted on
05/07/2004 7:09:43 AM PDT
by
petercooper
(We did not have to prove Saddam had WMD, he had to prove he didn't.)
To: RottiBiz
Kept talking about "Bush's clock" and demanding Rummy resign. I wanted to clock HER!
Murdock is going to start another channel. He has not eliminated another news and info channel and I hope he puts one up that is as one sided as the general media bias is, except on our side.
Let FOX continue to try to reach the so called middle.
115
posted on
05/07/2004 7:12:57 AM PDT
by
Cold Heat
(Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs)
To: crushkerry
The source did not say, so we don't know. I believe she is on the committe ... so there is a pretty good chance it was her
116
posted on
05/07/2004 7:13:49 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
To: sauropod
Should be interesting TV viewing. Undoubtedly. Levin, Kennedy, Byrd and the single most stupid and psychotic Senator of all time: Minnesota's Mark Dayton. Wait'll you see this guy stammering, stuttering and twisting his face into contortions.
Rummy has a target rich environment.
To: joebuck
Maybe the partisan Dems are giving the Kerry people a preview of what they are going to report, regardless of what the evidence shows.Maybe the partisan Dems had to agree in advance to produce an anti-Bush result just to get appointed at all.
118
posted on
05/07/2004 7:18:46 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(John Kerry's shabby lies make me very cranky.)
To: Barlowmaker
"For the benefit of the United States, for our country, I believe Mr. Rumsfeld has to resign," said Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa.
Said Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, "Mr. Rumsfeld has been engaged in a coverup from the start on this issue and continues to be so." And Rep. Charlie Rangel took it a step further, saying, "If the president doesn't fire the secretary, if he doesn't resign, I think it's the responsibility of this Congress to file articles of impeachment and force him to leave office."
119
posted on
05/07/2004 7:20:20 AM PDT
by
kcvl
To: wirestripper
Do not presume that Murdock is a conservative. He is a businessman who recognized the lack of media outlets which would appeal to a conservative audience, and decided that it would be profitable to support some conservative perspective.
120
posted on
05/07/2004 7:21:32 AM PDT
by
maica
(Member of Republican Attack Machine, RAM, previously known as the VRWC)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-158 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson