Skip to comments.
List of Gannett publications that cannot be posted to Free Republic per their copyright complaint
email and registered mail
| Gannett Publications
Posted on 05/06/2004 10:36:00 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Edited on 05/06/2004 10:41:34 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-368 next last
To: Jim Robinson
So just to be clear in my mind:
If we find the story on the web by googling, and use the "cache" link on google, for example, that's ok?
To: Jim Robinson
Only Titles??
22
posted on
05/06/2004 11:13:11 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
To: AlienCrossfirePlayer; Jim Robinson
Seems to me that publishing a link under these circumstances is doing them a favor which they don't deserve. I'm inclined to agree with ACP here. Why send them traffic if they think they're "too good" to be excerpted on FR? Just make a wholesale embargo on those domains.
23
posted on
05/06/2004 11:13:45 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(Leftists claim Bush is a terrorist. So why aren't they trying to appease him?)
To: Jim Robinson
And how does google itself get around this?
Is no one allowed to quote their stupid articles? I'm really getting miffed at this nonsense. Aw, the he!! with 'em all.
To: Jim Robinson
This is getting ridiculous!
What are they afraid of?
To: Prime Choice
Embargo 'em all.
You got it.
To: Jim Robinson
No more Mountville Clipper? Say it ain't so, Jim. Say it ain't so.
27
posted on
05/06/2004 11:17:17 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(John Kerry's shabby lies make me very cranky.)
To: Jim Robinson
Looks like more foreign sources are in store for the future.
To: Jim Robinson
"they have denied our request to allow posting of excerpts. They will only allow the posting of titles and links. "
===
Not even excerpts?!
This is beyond ridiculous.
29
posted on
05/06/2004 11:20:16 PM PDT
by
FairOpinion
(If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
To: Porterville
only thing good about Visalia is the pet store in the mall. Visalia has a mall?
30
posted on
05/06/2004 11:21:01 PM PDT
by
lewislynn
(Who made you, the casual observer, the expert?)
To: Jim Robinson
In this case, can we post a link to the DUmmies after they excerpt it? (just kidding)
31
posted on
05/06/2004 11:22:43 PM PDT
by
Ingtar
(Understanding is a three-edged sword : your side, my side, and the truth in between ." -- Kosh)
To: lewislynn
2 malls- the one with the pet store and the one with the Gottschalks
32
posted on
05/06/2004 11:29:18 PM PDT
by
Porterville
(Kerry has no gravitas!!!)
To: Ingtar
Seems like a legitimate question to me.
What the heck is the internet supposed to be, anyway?
I thought it was all about linking?
Silly me, that only applies in special circumstances.
Not here of course.
To: BigSkyFreeper
It's not like you've got a ton of choices up there...what are you going to read, Bozeman Chronicle?
34
posted on
05/06/2004 11:43:25 PM PDT
by
mrbillxx
To: texasbluebell
I'm pretty sure that short excerpts would be covered under Fair Use. In any case, if you see a story you want to post, go to news.google.com and see if another site has the same story. If you see another site linking to one of these papers, point out that they don't allow excerpts. That might cause fewer people to link to these papers. Send fewer hits there way and they'll probably change their policies.
To: Jim Robinson
No excerpting? How about paraphrasing (with accreditation). Certainly it is nothing that other media sites aren't already doing.
Fair use provisions of the US Constitution mean nothing to the left. Remember this the next time someone brings up the "First Ammendment".
36
posted on
05/07/2004 2:45:38 AM PDT
by
weegee
(NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS. CNN ignored torture & murder in Saddam's Iraq to keep their Baghdad Bureau.)
To: Ingtar
I'd say forward any and all leftist excerpts to the legal staff at those websites. Since newbies are not permitted to post at DUh, the articles posted there are from genuine RedDUpes.
37
posted on
05/07/2004 2:47:16 AM PDT
by
weegee
(NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS. CNN ignored torture & murder in Saddam's Iraq to keep their Baghdad Bureau.)
To: RWR8189; All
Maybe we should all call any of these local papers and tell them we are either canceling our subscription or boycotting their advertisers if they don't allow posting of an excerpt. I KNOW that would wake up some local business people who advertise with these pukes. You could call me but I have already pulled all my advertising from all papers. I now use direct advertising. It works better anyway.
38
posted on
05/07/2004 2:51:09 AM PDT
by
kcvl
To: Jim Robinson
"The Ithaca Journal" The City Of Evil just became that much more evil today.
39
posted on
05/07/2004 2:51:33 AM PDT
by
weegee
(NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS. CNN ignored torture & murder in Saddam's Iraq to keep their Baghdad Bureau.)
To: texasbluebell
Call their advertisers. That WILL work. They are already having trouble getting people to advertise with them once they figure out that direct advertising is a better and less expensive way to do it. I pulled all of mine from all newspapers when they started trashing President Bush in the last election. And don't forget to tell them why. Business people do care about their customers. Newspapers never really did until they started getting calls to cancel advertising. They always thought that people couldn't get their news from anywhere else so screw you. BIG FAT DO YOU WANT TO BET?!
40
posted on
05/07/2004 2:57:56 AM PDT
by
kcvl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-368 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson