Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/06/2004 7:14:16 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: doug from upland
Wow,, is there really record that he actually 'voted' at the meeting? I had just heard he was there. Why didn't he report the group to the FBI if assassinations were being discussed?!
2 posted on 05/06/2004 7:21:22 PM PDT by CharlotteVRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
Actually Doug, you can check out more on this story in this article, entitled "Kerry Attended Meeting - But Voted 'No' on Killing Senators
3 posted on 05/06/2004 7:21:43 PM PDT by crushkerry (Visit www.crushkerry.com to see John Kerry's positions filleted - and to see our lovely spokesmodel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
All true, but the mainstream press will spend far more time pouring over Bush's National Guard records looking for dirt than it will ever devote to this story.
4 posted on 05/06/2004 7:21:44 PM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
You may have continued to follow this closer than I have, but is it really established that he resigned his leadership? Or if he did, did he do it in stealth fashion? I think the Times continued to quote him well after then as a leader in the movement, and evidently Kerry didn't bother to deny it. That would be typical of Kerry's habit of playing everything both ways.

Of course I agree with you on the main point.
5 posted on 05/06/2004 7:23:38 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
doug,

I wish this had legs, but the press is not going to touch it. Kerry is what is called a "misprisoner of a felony" which is a felony since he failed to report the plot against the senators. However, due to the many witnesses, he has changed his tune from "I wasn't there" to "I can't remember being there". So, I guess that is some progress.
6 posted on 05/06/2004 7:31:44 PM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
Hillary.... She wants Kerry to lose because she thinks it will enhance her chances in 2008. She believes in nothing but her political career. Regardless, her move will initiate further infighting and perhaps a measure of revenge in 2008. I don't care either way. They are irrelevant.
11 posted on 05/06/2004 7:43:35 PM PDT by CurlyBill (Democrats = John Kerry reaching for your back pocket while Barney Frank reaches for the front.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
It will depend whether Hillary really wants Kerry to be just a place holder so she can jump in '08 or whether she wants him taken out so she can jump in '04.

She's taking the temperature of the nation daily and the press is doing her many favors in the interim. Because of those FBI files, she is able to blackmail them into submission. Not that they aren't willing anyway given their political leanings.
14 posted on 05/06/2004 7:47:05 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: backhoe
Please add your links.
16 posted on 05/06/2004 7:50:01 PM PDT by doug from upland (Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson