To: Joe Republc
I said yesterday, and Rush is saying today, this story is old news. It has been around since last fall. In January AP ran a story about it.
As Rush said, then, 'nobody cared [about the story].'
Remember GWB's NG service? It was vetting with little result for the 2000 election. It has been vetted twice again for the 2004 election.
The Dems dragged the NG dead horse 3 different times, making it news-cycle for a week at each vetting.
Regarding these, pictures, remember,
They have to be taken in context. Prisoners being naked for interrogation is not new, not even for law enforcement. The pics are being shown for shock value only. Those involved in the most egregious actions have already been investigated/arrested/tried in a court martial or are under investigation.
The lib media are releasing these pics now strictly for agenda purposes -- to embarrass and discredit the Bush administration.
The Admin could have let the air out of this had they simply come forth and said --those responsible for criminal actc have been investigated, arrested, and sentenced (period).
47 posted on
05/06/2004 9:52:57 AM PDT by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: TomGuy
Bump to #47 - best post so far!
99 posted on
05/06/2004 10:24:55 AM PDT by
Hegemony Cricket
(Better fight the WOT in the Iraqi "holy" city of Najaf, than in the American holy city of New York.)
To: TomGuy
bump
109 posted on
05/06/2004 10:37:12 AM PDT by
petercooper
(We did not have to prove Saddam had WMD, he had to prove he didn't.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson