To: Principled
you don't know that. it's a pretty good guess that not everyone rounded up was really a bad guy.
given how officially puritanical the Muslim culture is, given that our male soldiers have been told to steer clear of their women, how the h--- did the military let women soldiers have anything to do with male prisoners?
this plays right into the propaganda about the USA being debauched. and some of us are, obviously. here's proof.
one thing I hate more than evil people is stupid evil people. taking pictures. every shot is another shot at an American soldier somewhere.
Mrs VS
To: VeritatisSplendor
. . . how the h--- did the military let women soldiers have anything to do with male prisoners? One of the untold stories of this war is that the U.S. military is so desperately short on qualified males that we are using female soldiers for duties that they never would have been used for even ten years ago.
26 posted on
05/06/2004 8:34:08 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium . . . sed ego sum homo indomitus" -- William Wallace (Mel Gibson))
To: VeritatisSplendor
right- I said "probably"... meaning likely - not surely.
but of course she shouldn't have been theree- and i'll also say the behaiour shouldn't have taken place.
i only make reference to the human shredding to compare leashing to shredding. both bad, one deadly.
To: VeritatisSplendor
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Stupidity and LCD in action. Please do not downplay it, we are Americans and should deal with this in a forthright manner.
To: VeritatisSplendor
"given how officially puritanical the Muslim culture is, given that our male soldiers have been told to steer clear of their women, how the h--- did the military let women soldiers have anything to do with male prisoners?"
Excellant question!! No one has even ASKED that before. I guess it was too politically "insensitive".
198 posted on
05/06/2004 11:23:58 AM PDT by
ZULU
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson