Replies

"Grow up. I didn't suggest that. You made that self serving remark up and are imputing it to me. That's unfair and totally offbase."

It was the end result of your logic. To say 'we can't rebuild because if we do we'll be attacked' has the natural implication that if we don't rebuild, we won't be attacked. If you don't like the conclusion, then you need to re-think your position, not attack me for pointing it out.

"So someone in Louisiana can pump up his fist and say 'bring it on,' and feel good about himself? That's a pretty safe distance to be talking like a hero, son."

So who's forcing you to work at the construction site?

Actually that's wrong. It is not the end result of my logic.

Here goes:

I said we shouldn't rebuild at the WTC site now because it would be a very vuilnerable target during this time of war.

I didn't speak to any macro conclusion like you (wrongly) came up with. "If we don't rebuild, we won't be attacked." has nothing to do with it. It is odd that you would come to that conclusion - it makes no sense, big picture wise.

All I was saying is, and I am correct, that it is going to be difficult and not worthwhile to try and secure the construction site of such a fat, slow, and vulnerable target.

That does not specifically speak to any other targets or hits we might or might not endure, notwithstaning. In fact, I was explicit about that last point in my last post. Talk about pointing things out - you either can't or won't follow the thought process properly.

As for your words about forcing people to work at a construction site, they are shallow and immature. Nobody signs on to a domestic constuction job with the understanding that they might get murdered.

When people die because of terrorist sabotage at the construction site on a regular frequency, a remark like yours won't be very welcome. In fact, it suggests some kind of mental illness.