[orionblamblam]

> I'm very curious to know what the 300 scientists wrote.

Probably something along the lines of, "Our 300 voices outweigh the voices of several hundred thousand other scientists who understand that evolution is an established fact."

[Michael_Michaelangelo]

Probably something along the lines of, "Our 300 voices outweigh the voices of several hundred thousand other scientists who understand that evolution is an established fact."

Many scientists, no doubt, choose to not express their religious beliefs, or disbelief of Darwinism, due to the backlash they would receive from their peers.

And another thing - a theory can't be a fact. I would venture to guess that nearly 100% of scientists would tell you that.

[microgood]

"Our 300 voices outweigh the voices of several hundred thousand other scientists who understand that evolution is an established fact."

I thought evolution was a theory, not established fact. Certainly how we got to be on this planet cannot be explained by evolution (unless you believe in the primordial soup explanation, which is nothing but speculation), although it may explain how some of us have a different number of wisdom teeth when we are born.

[Diddle E. Squat]

If Darwinism is correct, why on earth would you be afraid to have both sides presented? If Darwinism is correct, can't it stand on its own merits?

[MEGoody]

"Probably something along the lines of, "Our 300 voices outweigh the voices of several hundred thousand other scientists who understand that evolution is an established fact."

Theory of evolution.

Law of gravity.

Hmmm. . .evolution is not a law. Apparently, it's not such an established fact after all.