Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CyberAnt; cwb
While most people here know that Clinton fired all US Attorneys in 1993, many may not know that he also fired all the Inspector Generals. The Inspectors General of the different government agencies are the ethics and crime watchdogs. During the Clinton administration, they, as well as the respective general counsels, were replaced with loyal cronies answering no longer to the people of the United States but to the White House Counsel's office.

This is an important, really crucial, point, when trying to understand the depths of the Clinton malfeasance and treason (and it WAS treason).
These people came into office with a set agenda, knowing full well what they intended to do right from the start....and these initial actions prove that that agenda included, perhaps depended upon, illegal activity. The question becomes, precisely who or what entity's agenda was it?
20 posted on 05/05/2004 11:04:04 AM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: MamaLucci
Mama, remember all those all night sessions we worked on the Chinagate mess? We've waited SO long for this to all come out..... won't hold my breath on the media.
22 posted on 05/05/2004 11:32:21 AM PDT by AuntB (Law Schools & Journalism schools are America's Madrassas.(aculeus) Jamie Gorelick is proof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: MamaLucci
OMG - I'm stunned. I had never heard about the Inspector Generals being replaced. That means Hillary has a plant in every department.

And .. I agree with you about your statement: "agenda included, perhaps depended upon, illegal activity".

And .. it now looks like Gorelick was a part of that planned agenda to change the laws to support their illegal activity. This is a bombshell!

Now that the "wall" is down, what are the chances the dots will be connected regarding all the Clinton malfeasance, which has never been prosecuted, and some real charges or indictments will result ..?? I'm not holding my breath, but when Bush is re-elected, that would be the opportune time to let it fly.

I do want to say here that Bush never went into office with the agenda of getting Clinton. In fact, I believe the President has kept it low key for 2 reasons, to protect the "presidency", and Bush didn't really want the media focused on Clinton instead of Bush's agenda for change in America - the Patriot Act, education, taxes, etc. But .. if the DOJ can connect the dots .. I'm wondering if Bush will allow it to go forward ..??
24 posted on 05/05/2004 12:02:59 PM PDT by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson