Skip to comments.
World Court Orders Changes in U.S. Death Penalty
The New American ^
Posted on 05/05/2004 8:15:31 AM PDT by Nasty McPhilthy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
To: Nasty McPhilthy
Asked for a response to the World Court declaration, the USA was quoted as saying, "Nuts."
2
posted on
05/05/2004 8:17:20 AM PDT
by
xrp
To: Nasty McPhilthy
Ahh... the sound of silence...
3
posted on
05/05/2004 8:17:20 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
To: Nasty McPhilthy
U.S. to ICC:
"Chupa le".
4
posted on
05/05/2004 8:18:21 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
To: Nasty McPhilthy
World Court...kiss our ever-lovin' a$$.
5
posted on
05/05/2004 8:19:20 AM PDT
by
Jagdgewehr
( Warning: content may cause emotional stress to over-sensitive Liberals.)
To: Nasty McPhilthy
The World Court insists that its rulings are "binding, final and without appeal" Bind this.
}:-)4
6
posted on
05/05/2004 8:19:30 AM PDT
by
Moose4
(Those who serve--thank you. May you find us worthy of the sacrifices you make.)
To: Nasty McPhilthy
World court........sit down and shut up.
To: Nasty McPhilthy
Yep,we'll get right on it.
8
posted on
05/05/2004 8:19:57 AM PDT
by
Redcoat LI
("help to drive the left one into the insanity.")
To: Nasty McPhilthy
Flip, flip, flip, flip. Nope. Just checked, no mention of a World Court in the Constitution. Must just be some made up thing.
9
posted on
05/05/2004 8:20:22 AM PDT
by
TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
(Pat Tillman took a bullet for me and mine. RIP Ranger Tillman.)
To: Nasty McPhilthy
OK, so when do we tell the World Court to p!ss up a rope? IIRC, the US does not recognize the jurisdiction of the World (Kangaroo) Court.
10
posted on
05/05/2004 8:20:28 AM PDT
by
RebelBanker
(Now, I don't wanna kill you, and you don't wanna be dead.)
To: Travis McGee
Attencion por favor.
11
posted on
05/05/2004 8:21:38 AM PDT
by
TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
(Pat Tillman took a bullet for me and mine. RIP Ranger Tillman.)
To: Nasty McPhilthy
And some people don't think this coming election is important?
To: Nasty McPhilthy
Hmmm.
Any chance the vaunted World Court can convince Mexico to stop sending us its murderers and crooks?
Maybe instead of Baghdad, the 1st Cav should've deployed to the border.
To: Nasty McPhilthy
Our response to the ICC should be to take all 47 of the Mexican miscreats out to a public square -- the Mall in DC will do -- and hang them in one fell swoop.
14
posted on
05/05/2004 8:22:27 AM PDT
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
To: Nasty McPhilthy
A very well thought out and politically sensitive response is required.
I suggest a nation=wide death row survey that, in effect, asks, "OK, Pancho, who's next!"
15
posted on
05/05/2004 8:23:05 AM PDT
by
Tacis
To: Nasty McPhilthy
"we will not tolerate foreign forces dictating laws to Mexicans."
I THINK THAT ABOUT SUMS IT UP.... HOW DARE THOSE AMERICANS ENFORCE THEIR LAWS ON THEIR LAND TO OUR CITIZENS. GEEEZ!!!
To: Nasty McPhilthy
I wonder what the World Court justices would do if instead of reviewing the case of the 47 Mexicans, we just bombed the hell out of the Hague. Completely Dresdenified it.
Just wondering.
17
posted on
05/05/2004 8:23:57 AM PDT
by
Pete
To: Nasty McPhilthy
Kerry likes the world court.
18
posted on
05/05/2004 8:24:08 AM PDT
by
Unicorn
(Two many wimps around)
To: RebelBanker
IIRC, the US does not recognize the jurisdiction of the World (Kangaroo) Court. That is correct. The US is not a signatory to the ICC, and therefore the ICC by their own guidelines should not have even taken this "case".
19
posted on
05/05/2004 8:24:14 AM PDT
by
kevkrom
(The John Kerry Songbook: www.imakrom.com/kerrysongs)
To: Tacis
Someone needs to tell these people that we are the United States and we abide by the rules of OUR country.
20
posted on
05/05/2004 8:24:25 AM PDT
by
Sangria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson