Posted on 05/04/2004 4:46:55 AM PDT by BobKeyser
Some dare call it treason
By Jack Cashill © 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
No American had more sway over Clinton administration foreign policy than Loral honcho Bernard "Bernie" Schwartz. His money spoke with such clarity that, in early February 1996, the White House dispatched Ron Brown to collect a major chunk of it in person. No doubt, Schwartz could have mailed it in. But by sending a Cabinet member, the White House signaled both its respect for Schwartz and its recognition of his intent, namely to secure waiver approval for Loral's satellite launches.
In return for staying "on board" Brown's sinking ship, his confidante Nolanda Hill, who had also been targeted by Brown's independent counsel, insisted on being apprised of any action that might threaten her freedom. Brown welcomed a second opinion. On his February trip to New York to see Schwartz, he needed one.
The meeting was brief and to the point. Hill met with Brown immediately afterward. Still reeling, Brown showed her the two checks Schwartz had given him. Hill could not believe what she was seeing. Combined, they totaled $1.2 million. Hill does not "think" the total was $1.2 million, she "knows" it was and told the Justice Department as much in a pre-sentencing interview.
The checks must have unnerved even the Democratic National Committee, as they were never logged in. Still, Schwartz got his point across, and before this election cycle was over, he would officially donate more than $630,000 in soft money to the DNC – 50 times what he had given in the last presidential election. No Democrat gave more.
In February 1996, Schwartz's money mattered. The Clintons were just beginning to smell victory. To secure it, they had to continue feeding the TV beast. They had fully ignored all Federal Election Commission restrictions and were using soft money as though it were hard.
Much to Schwartz's frustration, however, the Pentagon was standing firm on the question of commercial satellites. Given the vital technology contained therein, much of it secret, the military had convinced Secretary of State Warren Christopher to keep the satellites on the so-called ''munitions list,'' an inventory of the nation's most sensitive military and intelligence-gathering equipment.
Almost immediately, Deputy National Security Adviser Sandy Berger had begun plotting to undermine Christopher. In November 1995, Berger sent a memo to Christopher's deputy and long time Clinton buddy, Strobe Talbott. Berger claimed that Ron Brown, who "was far more sympathetic to the satellite makers," would appeal Christopher's ruling to Clinton. Berger was clearly setting Brown up for the fall, should there ever be one.
Still, despite Berger's machinations, the serious professionals within the National Security Agency, State and Defense were resisting the wholesale transfer of licensing authority for these satellites to the Commerce Department. Once moved to Commerce, the military feared it would lose veto power over exports. In time, Berger would justify their fears as he eventually finessed control to the Commerce Department.
Nolanda Hill was appalled. For all the compromises of her Washington life, she retained her red-blooded Texan vigor. She loved her country, warts and all, and damned if she didn't know where those warts were. What Brown and Schwartz were doing was treasonous, she thought, and said so in no uncertain terms.
Just a week or so after Brown's New York meeting with Schwartz, a Chinese Long March 3B rocket carrying the Loral-built Intelsat 708 satellite crashed just after liftoff and killed or injured at least 60 people in a nearby village. This was the third Long March failure in the last three years involving U.S.-built satellite payloads.
Confident of his relationship with the president, Schwartz up and dispatched a Loral-led review team to China to assess the failure of the rocket and suggest refinements. The Cox Committee would later describe Schwartz's actions as "an unlicensed defense service for the People's Republic of China that resulted in the improvement of the reliability of the PRC's military rockets and ballistic missiles."
So serious was the offense that in 1998 the Criminal Division of the Justice Department launched an investigation. Incredibly, while the investigation was in process, Berger, now national security adviser, sent a memo to the president urging him to "waive the legislative restriction on the export to China of the communications satellites and related equipment for the Space Systems /Loral (SS/L) Chinasat 8 project."
This waiver would present a huge problem for the prosecution. Berger admitted as much: "Justice believes that a jury would not convict once it learned that the president had found SS/L's Chinasat 8 project to be in the national interest." But Berger was not about to let that stop him: "We will take the firm position that this waiver does not exonerate or in any way prejudge SS/L with respect to its prior unauthorized transfers to China." Berger was blowing smoke, and he knew it. A waiver would make prosecution all but impossible. Under pressure from Schwartz, the president approved the waiver, and the prosecution came to naught.
This story merits its own book, but what deserves immediate comment is the willingness of the Clintons to risk everything to keep the cash pipeline open. Schwartz kept it open and full. Before he was through, Schwartz and Loral would donate roughly $2 million to the Clinton cause. Whether Schwartz gave additional money or favors off the books is a question that deserves asking.
A second question that deserves asking is just how much damage Schwartz, Berger and the Clintons did to America's national security.
A third question worth asking is whether Ron Brown's very real threats to expose these machinations led to his death.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Cashill is an Emmy-award winning independent writer and producer with a Ph.D. in American Studies from Purdue.
IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE MEDIA AND WOULD LIKE TO SCHEDULE AN INTERVIEW WITH JACK CASHILL, PLEASE EMAIL BOB KEYSER AT rkeyser5@nycap.rr.com
FYI pal, you're not gonna want to miss this.
...it' right up your alley.
And of course ABCCBSNBCCNNNYTIMESWASHPOST are lining up to jump on this (sarcasm off now!)
Oh you must mean flight 800.
Well my fine feathered freind, I know people who saw 800 go down and they all say it was a missile.
You can try and paint him as a kook, but just look at Shelly kelly, the air force flight attendant that lived through the crash without a scratch on her.
SHE WALKED AWAY FROM THE CRASH
Less than an hour later, she was dead from a laceration on her neck. SHE BLED TO DEATH from a wound she did not have when she walked away from the crash.
YOu can say whatever you want, but I know Mr Cashill and he's no Crank.
That's Willy and Hilly for ya'!
Yep...the DOJ was intentionally emasculated to make Clinton's TREASONOUS crimes easier to conceal.......but they are no longer concealed and the DOJ is under new ownership...how come no investigations/prosecutions of the CorruptClintonCadreOfCommunistCo-Conspirators?!
Where is Ashcroft on this?!
FReegards...MUD
Is it not reasonable to admit that CommunistChina is our single most dangerous adversary on the planet, and has been since the dissolution of the Soviet Union? Is it not reasonable to figger that our National Security would be best-served by forbidding the Chi-Coms access to sensitive rocket propulsion technology that would allow them to create nuclear-warhead-tipped rockets to aim at American cities?
However, in exchange for $Millions in ILLEGAL CAMPAIGN DONATIONS, Slick Willie overrode his DOD and instructed his Dept. of Commerce to make this nuclear technology available to the Chi-Coms!! Is it not reasonable to call such an act "TREASON"?!!
TREASON is a Capital Crime...MUD
And it is no less scandalous that Ashcroft's DOJ has refused to investigate and prosecute the GUILTY, making it a BiPartisan Coverup!!
FReegards...MUD
I didn't even bother to read the article...the title of which was taken from a '60s diatribe, "None Dare Call it Treason", and my response from the title of the '60s response, "None Dare Call it Reason".
I figured that anyone who would make reference to that whole disreptable episode was just itching to repeat it.
I'd never heard that before...do you know who coined the phrase?
FReegards...MUD
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.