Skip to comments.
US abruptly demotes Saddam general in Fallujah
Telegraph ^
| May 3, 2004
| Toby Harnden
Posted on 05/03/2004 9:44:42 PM PDT by John Jorsett
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: McGavin999
Obviously the military doesn't have much say in the matter.
21
posted on
05/03/2004 10:07:11 PM PDT
by
mercy
To: John Jorsett
I can only shake my head with disgust at this turd circus.
22
posted on
05/03/2004 10:09:12 PM PDT
by
squidly
(I have always felt that a politician is to be judged by the animosity he excites among his opponents)
To: mercy
Yep, obviously it's the media who is making the decisions. At least that's how it must be since they are the ones telling us all this, and we have people who are dumb enough to believe it.
23
posted on
05/03/2004 10:09:28 PM PDT
by
McGavin999
(If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
To: mercy
George Bush did not pick the general.
24
posted on
05/03/2004 10:10:13 PM PDT
by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: John Jorsett
I am SHOCKED! I'll also throw in "deeeeeeeeeeply concerrrrrrrrrned."
This must do wonders for troop morale. Not.
To heck with this, It's time for Captain Paintball's "THREE Ls:"
LEAFLETS for the citizens. Women and children have 24 hours to "ex-cape". (a little ebonics lingo, there.) ALL men leaving the city will be set aside in a nearby camp and interrogated. Humanely, of course.
LEVEL the city. With the force of 1000 daisycutters, Fallujah will be incinerated in a show of force not seen since Hiroshima.
'LIM-IN-ATE the survivors. Those not smart enough to leave, and all the "brave" insurgents left alive will be put out of their misery.
This will work if we do it hard, fast, and without apology.
25
posted on
05/03/2004 10:11:29 PM PDT
by
Captainpaintball
(All it takes for Liberalism to triumph is for Conservatives to fail in their responsibilities.)
To: mercy
Of course there is always the possibility that someone decided to put in place a Saddamite general for the Islamics in Al Fallujah to swoon over that they could then fire. That the US put this guy in charge one day and fired him the next, shows they did not win in Al Fallujah despite the 24 hours of talk on the part of the Islamics.
Is there this kind of deep thinking going on on the part of US officials in Iraq? Who knows. But it would take an Iraqi like this guy that the governing counsel would not be greatly supportive of for this to work out like it has.
26
posted on
05/03/2004 10:15:44 PM PDT
by
JLS
To: John Jorsett
OR, there was no way he wanted to be caught between the Marines and his insane countrymen so he took the quickest way out.
27
posted on
05/03/2004 10:17:19 PM PDT
by
Let's Roll
(Kerry is a self-confessed unindicted war criminal or ... a traitor to his country in a time of war)
To: Captainpaintball
Never happen. PC RULES. We're screwed. No, our sodiers (sons and daughters) are screwed.
28
posted on
05/03/2004 10:17:24 PM PDT
by
mercy
To: mickie
Man, you got that right! It will happen sooner than later. Our Generals over there have no frigging clue what they are doing!
29
posted on
05/03/2004 10:31:52 PM PDT
by
USMMA_83
To: KQQL
Another Bagdad, Bob. Bring him over here and let him work for the DNC.
30
posted on
05/03/2004 10:33:49 PM PDT
by
oyez
(Fortune favors the bold.)
To: John Jorsett
Sounds like a psychological means to an end.
He became the example of what to NOT do in short order for one reason or another.
Trust me...if you dig far enough into the mind of a terrorist, you would realize that there is a much bigger mark...the Marines already seized the opportunity to MAKE A POINT.
Think extremely hard here.
Saving PFC Lynch help.
Otay, then.
More examples, anyone.
To: mercy
This one I agree with you. I think we need to form the Federal Republic of Iraq. It would be made up of 3 states, the northern state, the central state and the southern state. Baghdad might be the equivalent of DC, a federal capital city.
I would think that Ninawa, Dahuk, Abril, As Sulmaniyah and At Tamim provinces might make up the Northern state. Whether or not we officially could call it Kurdish, that is what it would be. [Keep in mind for this state and the other two, I am guessing about which province belongs where. Ninawa might for example group better with the Central state.
The Central state might be made up of Al Anbar, Salahad, Baghdad and Diyala provinces. This would at least unofficially be the Sunni state.
I am not sure which state Babil province belongs in but lets say for now the Southern state along with An Najaf, Al Qadisiyana, Maysan, Dhi Qar, Al Bassrah and Al Muthanna provinces. Again remember, I am guess which provinces actually group where, but this is clearly the Shia state.
Then the US puts three huge bases in place. One between south of Kurkuk and north of Tikrit. Another south of Baghdad but north of Al Najaf. The third on the outskirts of Baghdad.
They get a bicarmeral legislature. Each state gets 10 Senators and each state gets their share by population of 100 members of the lower body. They have a popularly elected executive and a constitution that is very explicit about INDIVIDUAL rights.
The US stays on these bases except if fighting is about to break out between the various states. The US also focuses on border security so that the Iraqis can have their own internal battles.
The oil fields are in the two states, Northern and Southern where things have been calmer since major combat ended. The US gets 99 years leases on the bases. The US pays only to build its bases and the Iraqi government must use the country's oil money and any money stolen by France, Russia and Germany it recovers to rebuild infrastructure. Each state could have a capital, police force etc, but no army. Only the Federal government would have an army.
Here is a map of Iraq for examining my proposed states:
http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/iraq_wall_full_2003.jpg
32
posted on
05/03/2004 10:51:05 PM PDT
by
JLS
To: John Jorsett
Perhaps there is another Wesley Clarke type in the military?
To: the_Watchman
Perhaps there is another Wesley Clarke type in the military?So we can have more refugees than we can stick a shake at?
34
posted on
05/03/2004 11:05:57 PM PDT
by
Kate of Spice Island
("And Clark could not afford the extra vowel, so he didn't solve the puzzle, Vanna.")
To: JLS
A couple quick comments:
Ninawa would without question be in the northern Kurdish dominated state, although it's possible that the southernmost quarter of the province might be partitioned off.
I would guess that Babil would also be partitioned, with the northern half to go with the Sunni state, probably added to Baghdad province for administrative purposes.
People keep ignoring that there are also oil fields in Central Iraq - the East Baghdad field has an estimated 11 billion barrels in reserves - compared to the northern Kirkuk field, by example, that has an estimated 9 billion barrels left. I dunno why people keep brushing off the Baghdad field..
Iraq should be partitioned into three independent nations - ASAP.
35
posted on
05/03/2004 11:06:52 PM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
To: JLS; Captainpaintball
A hybrid of the two plans would be the best strategy.
Take out the trash, organize and meet that June 30th deadline!
To: John Jorsett
It may be time for some micromanagement.
37
posted on
05/03/2004 11:13:06 PM PDT
by
edsheppa
To: firstiamaussoldier
I think you are right. One for the short-term, the other for the long-term. I can't understand why forcing tribal-minded savages to live together in one common boundary seemed like a good idea to anyone.
38
posted on
05/03/2004 11:21:45 PM PDT
by
Captainpaintball
(All it takes for Liberalism to triumph is for Conservatives to fail in their responsibilities.)
To: squidly
I can only shake my head with disgust at this turd circus. Couldn't agree more. This is so incredibly pathetic - reminds me of our worst from Vietnam - makes me sick. I really thought Bush had more of a backbone. I doubt we'll recover from this fiasco.
I'm sure the Iraqization of this war is going to be just as successful as the Vietnamization of that other war.
39
posted on
05/03/2004 11:21:48 PM PDT
by
aquila48
To: KQQL
bush said we would use double dealing, turn enemies against themselves, use subterfuge to turn enemies to allies one day and back against each other on other occasions....
THIS...
could be...
THAT.
I dunno.
Bait and switch... bigger than a loss leader at your local kmart seems to be going on...
40
posted on
05/03/2004 11:55:25 PM PDT
by
Robert_Paulson2
(the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson