So let me get this straight...this woman horribly victimized fifteen young children. She really doesn't seem too torn up about that. But she does get her panties all in a bunch over the prospect of possibly being victimized herself? Give me a break.
1 posted on
05/02/2004 7:03:53 AM PDT by
AQGeiger
To: AQGeiger
"I don't want them bringing their issues on me."You raped babies, girl. If you don't see that your "issues" are exactly the same, that's your problem.
To: AQGeiger
You don't understand--she only victimized boys, that's not as bad (heck, they were probably asking for it, right?) She didn't victimize members of an official victim group, so she deserves special treatment (/sarcasm)
3 posted on
05/02/2004 7:10:11 AM PDT by
scottinoc
To: AQGeiger
What goes around....
So the prospect of being treated the way she has treated others doesn't sound so good, hmmm? IMO, it would be just punishment for raping 15 children, the sicko.
6 posted on
05/02/2004 7:14:15 AM PDT by
No Fool
To: AQGeiger
My bad, she victimized girls as well. What frosts me is that she's trying to portray herself as the victim.
7 posted on
05/02/2004 7:14:31 AM PDT by
scottinoc
To: AQGeiger
Laura McCollum
8 posted on
05/02/2004 7:15:33 AM PDT by
DemWatch
To: AQGeiger
Exactly what I was thinking--cry me a river.
10 posted on
05/02/2004 7:16:55 AM PDT by
cupcakes
To: AQGeiger
I have waited all my life for a female sexual offender and they put her AWAY? Doh!!
To: AQGeiger
How about a bullet in the head for her and her 190 cell mates, therapy session over, your cured.
18 posted on
05/02/2004 7:21:36 AM PDT by
ColoradoSlim
(Shoot first, ask questions later.)
To: AQGeiger
Interesting that she's concerned that the men will take out their issues on her.
If the men abused boys, their issues most likely relate to abuse at the hands of men. If they are abusers of girls, their issues most likely relate to something which caused them to sexualize at an early age.
In general, it is very unlikely that their issues involve fat, ugly 40-year old women.
May as well bunch them all together. There is no strong evidence that pedophiles can be "cured".
21 posted on
05/02/2004 7:27:13 AM PDT by
sharktrager
(The greatest strength of our Republic is that the people get the government they deserve.)
To: AQGeiger
Nice to see they're putting prisoners to work.
23 posted on
05/02/2004 7:31:32 AM PDT by
Wolfie
To: AQGeiger
I don't care where they put this human piece of garbage. Preferably she should be placed in the closest cemetary.
How the HELL could any judge/jury even remotely consider letting this woman out at any point in her worthless life?
No sympathy, empathy, excuses, or second chances for child molestors.
24 posted on
05/02/2004 7:34:53 AM PDT by
Brytani
(Politics: n. from Greek; "poli"-many; "tics"-ugly, bloodsucking parasites.)
To: AQGeiger
She better put her uterus in a lock box and tell them nasty mens to "KEEP YER HANDS OFF MY UTERUS!!"
FMCDH
27 posted on
05/02/2004 7:40:20 AM PDT by
nothingnew
(KERRY: "If at first you don't deceive, lie, lie again!")
To: AQGeiger
They should just release her.
When they do they need to announce ahead of time when and where the release will take place. At the scheduled time, throw her out of a moving van, buck naked with a big target painted on her butt.
To: AQGeiger
She can dish it out, but she can't take it.
37 posted on
05/02/2004 7:52:30 AM PDT by
Agnes Heep
(Solus cum sola non cogitabuntur orare pater noster)
To: AQGeiger
I think these people should get the death penalty. I hate that anyone spends a second worried about her "care." I hate that someone carefully makes her meals. I don't care if she was abused in childhood; I mean, that is very sad indeed, but G-d always gives people a chance to rise above their bad surroundings and she chose not to take it.
If we put them all to death, there would be less of them around to hurt children.
64 posted on
05/02/2004 11:17:47 AM PDT by
Yaelle
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson