Skip to comments.
Howitzers Are Leaving Slopes for Tour of Duty
The Washington Post ^
| May 2, 2004
| Rene Sanchez
Posted on 05/01/2004 11:43:53 PM PDT by neverdem
Even at ski resorts, wartime brings hardship.
On the slopes of Mammoth Mountain and Alpine Meadows, high along California's Sierra Nevada range, resort operators have grown accustomed to using five leased Army howitzers to blast loose dangerous drifts of snow packed high on mountainsides.
"They work really well for avalanche control work," said Pam Murphy, senior vice president for Mammoth Mountain ski resort.
But the military wants the big guns back. It needs them for troops fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Army officials came knocking for the artillery cannons a few days ago, saying they had no choice but to break their deal with the ski resorts because the weapons, once surplus stock, now have to be hastily spruced up and shipped out to the front lines overseas.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; banglist; howitzers; iraq; lightartillery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
What the h*ll, have that many cannons been demilitarized, sold, converted to inert PGMs or melted?
1
posted on
05/01/2004 11:43:54 PM PDT
by
neverdem
To: neverdem; SLB
When I first saw this last week my initial response was it was all BS !
Did a little research with some folks still in the arena and Uncle Sugar does indeed need em back and fast....amazing.
Stay Safe !
2
posted on
05/01/2004 11:48:59 PM PDT
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
To: *bang_list; fourdeuce82d; archy; Cannoneer No. 4; Darksheare
This howitzer leased to a resort near Tahoe City, Calif., is used to dislodge snow overhangs. (Rachael Woods -- Alpine Meadows Via AP)
3
posted on
05/01/2004 11:49:48 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: Squantos
There was a time we had boucoup of them. Surely we do not have that many in theatre, whereby we must go to ski resorts to take back those on loan?
4
posted on
05/01/2004 11:52:49 PM PDT
by
going hot
(Happiness is a momma deuce)
To: neverdem
Why is it then that the MLRS units are still stateside?
5
posted on
05/01/2004 11:53:56 PM PDT
by
datura
(Time to admit this is a war of Islam versus the US. They are ALL the enemy.)
To: going hot
I think the need is possibly based on the ability to airlift to very high altitudes w/ ammo and troops. Small howitzers are bling bling in Afghanistan right now.
Stay Safe !
6
posted on
05/02/2004 12:02:25 AM PDT
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
To: datura
Why is it then that the MLRS units are still stateside? Maybe their sub-munitions disperse over too big an area, or maybe their sub-munitions don't detonate instantly as desired, or they are too big for the job. I don't know.
7
posted on
05/02/2004 12:04:21 AM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: Squantos
That would certainly be a good use to put them to. Sort of like mountaintop to mountaintop sniping. I like it!!
My curiosity was regards what did the army do with the many we had? Surely we did not run out of them, or did we in fact demil them and otherwise sell them for scrap?
8
posted on
05/02/2004 12:09:32 AM PDT
by
going hot
(Happiness is a momma deuce)
To: going hot
Dunno........If ya find out more please ping me !
Stay Safe !
9
posted on
05/02/2004 12:12:57 AM PDT
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
To: Squantos
did a quick scope. Seems this particular model of howitzer, the M119-A is the newest model, and improvemnt over the 105. It looks somewhat lighter. Perhaps to get further up the mountain with a sling load of shells and a crew to serve it all in one flight. Maybe they did not make as many of the newer model? Will keep scoping.
10
posted on
05/02/2004 12:25:17 AM PDT
by
going hot
(Happiness is a momma deuce)
To: going hot; Squantos
Maybe there are some dangerous snow overhangs in Afghanistan that need dislodging? Safety first, I always say.
11
posted on
05/02/2004 6:16:30 AM PDT
by
Sender
(I actually voted for inconsistancy before I voted against it.)
To: neverdem
Any guess as to what kind of shell they use for avalanche duty?
12
posted on
05/02/2004 8:01:01 AM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
To: Beelzebubba
Any guess as to what kind of shell they use for avalanche duty? It appears to be the latest model to fire 105mm ammo, but it's been almost 25 years since I was in a similar unit, and the picture isn't the best.
13
posted on
05/02/2004 8:55:47 AM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: Beelzebubba
Any guess as to what kind of shell they use for avalanche duty? IIRC, they have also used 75mm howitzers, which could be packed and hauled by mules in WW II, and 106mm recoilless rifles for avalanche duty. I don't know about the 106mm, but the last that I heard was that we still keep 90mm recoilless rifles in our infantry inventory for use in arctic and similar environments where the "Dragon" ATGM(anti-tank guided missile) isn't reliable.
14
posted on
05/02/2004 10:13:32 AM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: going hot
Probably just a particular light mountain model, wanted for Afghanistan. We have plenty of garden variety towed 105s and 155s.
15
posted on
05/02/2004 10:32:16 AM PDT
by
JasonC
To: JasonC
It's the M-119A1 105mm light towed howitzer, max range 12000 meters, and 19,200 meters with RAP rounds.
Helicopter portable, and pulled along by an M-1097 Humvee usually.
The M-102 is considered obsolete and has been mostly replaced with the 119.
However, former Gerneal Eric Shinseki started off a plan to slash artillery units.
A plan that had been continued until recently.
Quite a few light towed artillery units were removed from service.
Oops.
Now they need them.
16
posted on
05/02/2004 2:54:37 PM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Fortune for the day: I call upon the gods of STERNO and MATCHLIGHT to take care of the evil DUers!)
To: datura
MLRS cannot mark with smoke or do illume missions.
Yet.
But a 105mm illume round costs less than an MLRS illume rocket would.
And a White phosphorus 105mm round is safer and costs less than an MLRS white phosphorus rocket would.
The WP rounds tend to be picky about rough handling, and an MLRS rocket tends to be thin skinned.
17
posted on
05/02/2004 2:57:59 PM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Fortune for the day: I call upon the gods of STERNO and MATCHLIGHT to take care of the evil DUers!)
To: 1stFreedom; Redleg Duke; SAMWolf; archy; I got the rope; 300winmag; cavtrooper21; ...
FAMPL ping
18
posted on
05/02/2004 5:55:22 PM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Bump
19
posted on
05/02/2004 5:56:42 PM PDT
by
SAMWolf
(War is God's way of teaching us geography)
To: Darksheare
Why don't we have mini-ground launched cruise missiles yet?
20
posted on
05/02/2004 5:59:34 PM PDT
by
bvw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson