Skip to comments.
Rasmussen: Bush up by 1% 46-45
rasmussenreports.com ^
| 1 May 2004
| Rasmussen
Posted on 05/01/2004 10:32:18 AM PDT by Owen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: lasereye
Not really. Perot was such a wild card that it was hard to tell just what he was going to do. Rush didn't expect a Clinton meltdown, although he certainly thought it should happen... thought the American electorate would wake up to the reality.
Rush is rarely wrong...
21
posted on
05/01/2004 12:39:47 PM PDT
by
halley
To: lasereye
Disagree. I believe that Kerry IS imploding... not that he couldn't win, but it's less and less likely... long way to go, though
22
posted on
05/01/2004 12:42:26 PM PDT
by
halley
To: lasereye
There sure are quite a few dims that disagree with you on kerry's "seemimg" implosion. He will not go "boom" and be gone in a flash...no, no. He will die of a thousand paper cuts, and the debates will be the beginning of his death knoll.
LLS
23
posted on
05/01/2004 1:55:16 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(We point out Kerry's record and the facts, and they just THINK it's attack politics.)
To: Owen
So, what was the nightly number last night, you math whizzes?
24
posted on
05/01/2004 4:40:28 PM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
To: lasereye
Kerry's got a real shot to win. He has a shot because he is the presumptive nominee of one of the parties in a two party system and presumably he will be a going concern on election day.
However, the economy is in another gear now getting ready to create quite a few jobs over the next year or two starting last month. By November, the economy will be an asset for Bush and not a liability.
The current problems in Iraq are actually serving to innoculate Bush come November on the Iraq issue. Either it will be markedly better over there, or it will be about the same or perhaps a little worse. It is, of course, possible for the bottom to fall out and then well all bets are off. But I would bet that things will be better come October or at least about the same.
25
posted on
05/01/2004 5:48:34 PM PDT
by
Tennessean4Bush
(An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds, a pessimist fears this is true.)
To: Tennessean4Bush
I think you're right. April's been a good month for Bush. In terms of events, the only good news was the economy, specifically the jobs report. April was a terrible month for Iraq, plus there was the 9/11 commission, the Clark book, and the Woodward book. In spite of all that he has gained.
When Rasmussen shows the two are even, that translates to Bush up by around 3 or 4. The job approval for April has been around 52, which is a good number. And Rasmussen shows Bush as preferred on handling the economy. Almost impossible for him to lose if that holds up.
26
posted on
05/01/2004 7:48:18 PM PDT
by
TomEwall
To: ambrose
I wonder if how they break depends on the times. Seems to me with nat security and war being the big issue, the late breakers may not want to take a risk with Kerry. Maybe it is wishful thinking.
27
posted on
05/01/2004 8:09:14 PM PDT
by
cajungirl
(<i>swing low, sweet limousine, comin' fer to Kerry me hoooommmee</i>)
To: VisualizeSmallerGovernment
Yes but there is no Perot this year.
John
To: lasereye
Exactly, I never trust that stuff! The media is doing all they can to bring Bush's numbers down, and it has worked so far. Kerry is not out of anything.
29
posted on
05/01/2004 8:12:56 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(Kerry has more flip flops than Waikiki Beach)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson