Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pat Toomey’s Future An interview.
National Review ^ | 4/30/04 | Ramesh Ponnuru

Posted on 05/01/2004 5:03:08 AM PDT by Elkiejg

NRO: Is this your first interview since the election?

Rep. Pat Toomey: Yes it is.

NRO: Given that you lost, what do you think your campaign accomplished?

Toomey: Well I'm still sorting that out, Ramesh, and trying to figure out what if anything it accomplished. When you consider the obstacles we faced and how close we got, it makes it clear that there is a real interest in seeing the Republican party govern as a conservative party, certainly in Pennsylvania.

NRO: What does the campaign say about the strength of the conservative movement, most of its institutions having backed you?

Toomey: The vast majority of them were on my side but very much to varying degrees of involvement. The Club for Growth was terrific, very strong and very involved. Much of the conservative print media, led by National Review of course, was on my side. There were others: the Wall Street Journal, The Weekly Standard, Human Events.

NRO: Rush Limbaugh?

Toomey: I think to a large degree Rush sat out the race.

NRO: Looking back at the race, were there any mistakes you would avoid if you did it again?

Toomey: I really don't think we made any blunders, I don't think we made any significant mistakes in terms of allocating resources. Looking back, there might have been ways to more effectively exploit the Internet. But would it have made the difference in the race? It's hard to say. I have to tell you, I feel pretty good about how we ran the race. We had a lot of discipline in terms of our message. We had limited resources and we developed a strategy based on our resrouces and it came very close to working for us.

NRO: Why should your supporters vote for Specter?

Toomey: Well, the alternative is worse. Joe Hoeffel will never be with Republicans or conservatives on anything. That's number one, and number two: I think we're going to hold on to the Senate and probably grow our majority. Increasing the Republican majority is a good thing. Every Republican makes it harder for the Democrats to filibuster.

NRO: But given that so many conservatives wanted Specter out on Tuesday, and that he has been moving left since then, do you think Specter will be able to win the votes of your supporters?

Toomey: I don't know.

NRO: Do you have any hard feelings toward Santorum?

Toomey: (Pause.) No, not really. I haven't spoken with him in a while.

NRO: You didn't get a call from him after the primary?

Toomey: That's correct.

NRO: What does the future hold for Pat Toomey?

Toomey: I don't know. I really don't know. My wife and I are out on Block Island decompressing. I'm hoping to read a novel. In the next few weeks we'll start thinking about what to do next.

NRO: Any interest in running for governor in 2006?

Toomey: I haven't really given it any thought. Several people have started talking about it, but I just don't have any idea.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: rameshponnuru; toomey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-227 last
To: Luis Gonzalez
"At least I have a clear agenda, I am a straight party ticket voter, I don't try to hide my culpability or seek to claim a higher ground by claiming the I "held my nose".

If you were in PA, you would have pulled that lever nine times to my four. Which would make you a little more than twice as culpable.

Almost 100% of the time, I vote for the most viable candidate whose views are closest to my own. At least 95% of the time, possibly more, that translates into a vote for the Republican.

You are on my back because 5% or less of the time, I do not vote Republican. Where is your expressed dissatisfaction with disloyal Specter who votes with the Republican party 40% or less of the time? I don't hear it. You are hyporcritical and inconsistent.

As I said prior, when critiquing Republican voters you are a political purist. No Republican voter who votes Republican less than 100% of the time is acceptable. You are also an elitist. You do not hold Republican politicians to that same standard and are willing to support a disloyal Republican politician who votes with the DEMOCRATS slightly more than 60% of the time.

Some people might define such behavior as SCHIZO. And they would be right.

221 posted on 05/02/2004 12:10:29 PM PDT by TOUGH STOUGH (For the good of our country,our state and the conservative cause, vote for Toomey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: TOUGH STOUGH
You have a candidate who can win the seat and vote GOP 100% of the time?

It certainly was not Toomey.

222 posted on 05/02/2004 12:29:08 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Pátria, pero sin amo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
HUH?
223 posted on 05/02/2004 12:36:11 PM PDT by TOUGH STOUGH (For the good of our country,our state and the conservative cause, vote for Toomey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone; Luis Gonzalez




Oh, Luis, cut him some slack. He's just a nice California guy who spends his free time on the internet posting tiger pictures and telling us all what's good for this country.

Don't get your hopes up.

It's a charge he can't prove on a quote he can't find because I said no such thing.

Watch; he's no better at this than you are.


224 posted on 05/04/2004 1:01:09 AM PDT by Sabertooth (Bush is to Illegals as Kerry is to terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
"It's a charge he can't prove on a quote he can't find because I said no such thing."

What would you like to bet?

225 posted on 05/04/2004 2:14:35 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Pátria, pero sin amo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; Luis Gonzalez
Watch; he's no better at this than you are.

I thing what Luis and I can be most proud of is we don't advocate the most despicable and shameful things that others on this thread do on an almost daily basis.

226 posted on 05/04/2004 2:38:21 PM PDT by ClintonBeGone (John Kerry is the Democrat's Bob Dole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone






Still watching?

Still nothing.


227 posted on 05/05/2004 6:47:37 AM PDT by Sabertooth (Bush is to Illegals as Kerry is to terrorists... And so is Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-227 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson