Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam's Man Takes Over In Fallujah
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 5-1-2004 | Toby Harnden

Posted on 04/30/2004 7:29:41 PM PDT by blam

Saddam's man takes over in Fallujah

By Toby Harnden in Baghdad
(Filed: 01/05/2004)

A former senior general in Saddam Hussein's army made a triumphant entry into the besieged city of Fallujah yesterday and was greeted by flag-waving locals celebrating the departure of US marines.

Maj Gen Jassem Mohammed Saleh, who headed Saddam's infantry forces, is to take over as head of what American officials are calling the "1st battalion of the proposed Fallujah Brigade".

Maj Gen Jassem Mahmood Saleh arriving in Fallujah This is a new force to police the Sunni stronghold.

His appearance came as two marines were killed and six wounded in the city when their patrol was attacked by a suicide car bomber.

The new Iraqi battalion will have up to 1,100 men, many of them former members of Saddam's forces and some insurgents who have been fighting the marines.

American commanders argued that there had been no deal with the insurgents and the marines leaving the city were not handing over control but simply "repositioning" their forces.

The locally-brokered deal came after President George W Bush decided the political risks of fighting for Fallujah street by street were too great. Abandoning much bellicose rhetoric about wiping out the foreign fighters and Saddam loyalists, US commanders decided to allow at least some of these elements to police the city with their blessing.

"This is not a withdrawal, it is not a retreat," insisted Brig Gen Mark Kimmitt, the senior US military spokesman in Iraq. "But as long as we continue to see progress, we will continue to pursue the political track."

He said the new force would start to man checkpoints. Gareth Bayley, a British coalition spokesman, said: "Talk of a peace deal is over the top. What we have here is a tactical change."

Tanks and American troops left Fallujah after pulling down barbed wire defences around the soft drinks factory where they had set up a base for the past three weeks.

Up to 80 marines remained but were expected to withdraw to a base outside Fallujah last night.

Many ordinary marines said they did not believe the initiative would work and it could endanger their lives when they had to revert to the "plan A" of a full-scale offensive to take Fallujah.

"Honestly, I don't think they're going to be able to do it," said Cpl Elias Chavez, 28.

"We had the insurgents cordoned off, they couldn't go anywhere, we had a chance to get them. Now they can flee wherever they want and we're still going to have to deal with them."

He said the new force, largely made up of Fallujah residents, would be unlikely to apprehend or clamp down on anti-coalition fighters.

By leaving without defeating the insurgents, their deployment since April 5, following the killing and mutilation of four US defence contractors, "was a waste of time, of resources and of lives".

"Everyone feels the same, especially those who know someone who was killed."

L Cpl Julius Wright, 20, said: "Now it's going to get worse. We pulled out when we should of gone in."

Gen Saleh shook hands with marine commanders before he entered the city, which is thought to house 2,000 insurgents.

Gen Kimmitt said he had little knowledge of the general's background but he had been "initially vetted".

The appointment is a stunning reversal of US policy, which was to exclude all Ba'ath Party members who held senior posts under Saddam.

But Gen Kimmitt said the new Fallujah force would be "completely integrated" with US forces and "under operational control" of marine commanders.

"Marines will continue to maintain a strong presence in and around Fallujah. We are certainly not withdrawing from Fallujah."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: charliefoxtrot; fallujah; handover; jassemsaleh; man; saddams; takes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 next last
To: elfman2
Here's a statement from today's Washington Post...

"The top Marine commander in Iraq has chosen to assemble what amounts to a Sunni Muslim militia run by officers once blacklisted by U.S. occupation forces in an attempt to avoid a new offensive that could be politically damaging to the United States in Iraq and across the Arab world."

If your expecting our joint command for that theater to issue a public statement saying anything more clear, I'm afraid you're not going to get it.

121 posted on 05/01/2004 7:44:45 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
Or how about this from the AP Wire...

"Under an agreement worked out by marine commanders in Fallujah, marines began withdrawing Friday from positions inside the city while Major General Jassem Mohammed Saleh entered the city to lead an Iraqi security force that will replace the marines.
DiRita said marine commanders had "a lot of authority to make decisions, and they're doing that, and they've developed this force."
That may explain why senior Pentagon officials appeared to have been in the dark about the agreement on Thursday when it was first announced in Fallujah by marine officers.
General John Abizaid, the head of the US Central Command, told reporters earlier Friday he did not know the Iraqi general who was leading the force.
Pentagon officials likewise had little information about Saleh other than reports that he was a respected officer with a popular following."

122 posted on 05/01/2004 8:08:35 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
" The top Marine commander in Iraq has chosen to assemble what amounts to a Sunni Muslim militia run by officers once blacklisted by U.S. occupation forces in an attempt to avoid a new offensive that could be politically damaging to the United States in Iraq and across the Arab world"

After two attempts, this is the closest thing you can find to support your claim that the pullback, "was a Marine plan through and through". It’s not even close.

It’s describing the Marines role in assembling the Sunni Brigade that they hope will avoid a new offensive. That’s not in dispute. We knew weeks ago that they were assembling local forces. We know they are hopeful.

There is absolutely nothing pointing to the decision to halt the attack on the Fallujahn insurgents being a Marine plan. As far as I can tell, despite great criticism of this decision, no one in the military, government or even the media is specifically saying that this was a decision made by Marines or even the Military.

That is the source of the frustration. From all appearances, the Marines had their knees knocked out from under them by politicians fearful of casualties. No one has documented any specific claims to the contrary, just vague statements of generally giving commanders full authority and referenced to their lead role in the development of the Fallujah brigade.

After two requests for evidence, your claim is completely unsupported.

123 posted on 05/01/2004 8:17:22 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Thank you so much for the analysis!
124 posted on 05/01/2004 8:17:25 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
Even today, the two Marines we lost were south of Fallujah. They were killed by a vehicle borne IED. How would "reducing" Golan have prevented those deaths.



The answer is called deterrence. You level a large part if not all of Fallujah and then you say if there are more attacks on our Forces we will MOAB another target rich environment, maybe even one in Syria or Iran.
125 posted on 05/01/2004 8:28:36 AM PDT by TomasUSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
""Under an agreement worked out by marine commanders in Fallujah” …

marine commanders had "a lot of authority to make decisions" "

Again, this is very vague.

Whe don't know the Marine's parameters for “working out” an agreement, and how much was “a lot of authority”. Who else had a lot of authority? This has the appearance of a public relations person doing their best to leave the impression that this was a command decision with next to nothing to support it. They’re claiming that it was not a Pentagon decision but they are not claiming that it was not pressured by IGC, CPA, Brahimi or Bush’s conference last week deciding against a large scale invasion.

Again, there is no evidence to date that halting the Fallujahn attack was a Military or USMC command decision, only that they were involved, which almost goes without saying.

126 posted on 05/01/2004 8:30:58 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: blam
Let us pray that Iraqi's will succeed in taking over their own security against terrorists who don't want a civilized society anywhere in the Middle East.

Marines are being quoted as saying this general helped them in the initial conflict and has been helping them since then. They are watching him carefully.

We shall see.

Our goal of getting rid of Saddam and Sons, with their billions for WMD, the science, and the M.O. use them has been completed.

Now, the country has a fighting chance to become civilized.
127 posted on 05/01/2004 8:37:58 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Me
I'd laugh but it's too true. Looks like the WOST is changing directions a bit
128 posted on 05/01/2004 9:03:27 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Let me give you a little something to think about.

We are a nation of over 200 million people. Let's say I'm the president and we know that there is a terrorist out there waiting to drive that van, you talk about, into someone and kill them. His one goal in life is to kill Americans.

Let's say out of those millions I pick you and order[not ask] you send your wife and kids out to drive around till they find him.

Now the reason i want you to do that is I might be able to reason with him if I can find him. By doing this I might be able to avoid upsetting the rest of his Middle East friends and the U. N.

While it would be tragic if they died, burnt and blown to pieces, it would only be 5 out of 200 million.

Now I know you don't mean to be that cold and unfeeling but that's what it sounds like to those who have lost loved ones in battle. When soldiers become numbers on a piece of paper, that's when they start being sacrificed on the almighty altar of politics.

129 posted on 05/01/2004 9:35:06 AM PDT by mississippi red-neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
"I’m still looking for a single statement from a military commander that this pullout/repositioning on the brink of victory was "a Marine plan through and through" or something like that."

This is what Genl Kimmitt is saying, about as close as you can get to answering you request - an Iraqi brigade operated and controlled by 1st MEF:

http://www.dod.mil/news/Apr2004/n04302004_200404303.html

"The 1st Marine Expeditionary Force is putting together the first battalion of a new Iraqi brigade being formed to restore and maintain order in the western city of Fallujah, a coalition military spokesman announced at a Baghdad news conference today.

An officer from the former Iraqi army will command the unit, which will be an interim organization under 1st MEF command, said Army Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, deputy operations director for Combined Joint Task Force 7.

Kimmitt said the mission of the proposed Fallujah Brigade "is part of the ongoing aspiration to have Iraqi security forces completely cooperative and cooperating with the coalition forces to provide security tasks and eventually to assume responsibility for security and stability throughout Iraq."

Soldiers of the former Iraqi army are being recruited for the new battalion, Kimmitt said, and the unit will work alongside the 1st MEF to return peace and stability to Fallujah. The first battalion of the new brigade is expected to have 600 to 1,100 members, he said.

The 1st MEF, he added, will exercise operational control of the unit and will provide the resources and equipment it needs.

Marines will continue to maintain a strong presence in and around Fallujah, Kimmitt said, until the new unit has demonstrated it can man designated checkpoints and positions.
130 posted on 05/01/2004 9:53:39 AM PDT by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - I salute our brave fallen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
"After two requests for evidence, your claim is completely unsupported."

OK smartass. Find me one single piece of documentation that proves or even indicates the Marine decision was driven by politicians. I happen to know for a fact you are wrong. Short of enlisting you into the military, getting you a security clearance, and stapling the proof to your forehead, I'm not going to be able to show you what you are looking for. And frankly, I have lost interest in trying. Your preconcieved notions do not reflect reality. We're all better off for it.

131 posted on 05/01/2004 10:18:14 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC
"The answer is called deterrence."

Think for a second. The Marines were killed by a suicidal maniac driving a car. How in the world do you "deter" suicidal maniacs?

132 posted on 05/01/2004 10:22:12 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
"This is what Genl Kimmitt is saying, about as close as you can get to answering you request "

That’s not even close to what I asked for.

I asked for " a single statement from a military commander that this pullout/repositioning on the brink of victory was "a Marine plan through and through" or something like that."

You only showed that Marines were responsible for assembling the indigenous police and military for Fallujah. If has been expected from the beginning.

What is disturbing is what is highlighted above. It’s indicative of massive political interference with the Marine’s campaign to defeat an attacking insurgency. And to date, there is absolutely no evidence to the contrary, just claims of people devoted to some vague statements about empowering local commanders to make decisions.

If I were to guess at this point, it looks like the Marines, frustrated for two weeks with very restrictive rules of engagement after loosing 12 members in a day, simply said, “Screw this. We’re out of here!” and prematurely empowered a force meant to police a pacified Fallujah to patrol undefeated insurgents.

In other words, politicians pressured Marines to compromise and abort defeating the insurgents in Fallujah, probably by the IGC, CPA, Brahimi or Bush’s conference last week deciding against a large scale invasion. This is what’s instinctively apparent to so many here. It’s not proven, just the most convincing explanation of such a dramatic departure from how Marines want to fight.

Now people who are adamantly claiming the contrary can’t find a source that supports them. Just vague or irrelevant statements like that one you just posted to me.

133 posted on 05/01/2004 10:25:06 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
"OK smartass."

Why did I know that if I just remained polite, reasonable and resolute, you would get frustrated at your own unsupportable faith that this compromise was a military decision and sink into juvenile name calling?

I don’t have to prove the contrary, it’s obvious to all but a narrow minority who don’t want to believe their eyes. You have to convince them otherwise, and thus far, you have no evidence (other that your “secrets”) to support such an apparently absurd claim.

Now get lost. I don’t have time to get drawn into juvenile name calling tantrums.

134 posted on 05/01/2004 10:36:23 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
"You only showed that Marines were responsible for assembling the indigenous police and military for Fallujah."

I thought that was what your question was focussed on, who set up this concept. Beyond that, it is made clear 1st MEF is overseeing the details. So it is a "Marine plan" and "Marine operation".

Questions that put in "on the 'brink of victory'" as if we are deviating from goals when in fact Kimmitt are saying goals and aims are intact IMHO are leading questions.

The straight question is: Who made the decision to approve this? And the answer is that this is actively worked on at 1st MEF level, so apparently *they are the ones initiating this "opportunity" as Genl Abizaid called it*, and they know more about details than eg Genl Abizaid. Genl Kimmitt and Genl Abizaid approves of this approach but all say it is an opportunity not the only solution; if it doesnt work Marines can attend to fallujah directly.

So what I see indicated (but admittedly doesnt prove) this was a bottom-up proposal not a top-down demand.

The rest of your write-up is speculation ... like this: "politicians pressured Marines to compromise and abort defeating the insurgents". The Generals have said nothing that indicates that is what is happening, and quite a few things contradicting that impression. Genl Conway seems to be the one most involved in the Fallujah brigade dialogs.

The fact that political and humanitarian considerations weigh in the factor here is to be expected. We dont want a pyrric victory in Fallujah, winning Golan but losing the mission. Marine Generals like Conway know this, one FReeper says he is a terrorism expert. Great.

The issue you speculate on is whether unwise or *undue* political pressure based on wimpiness is costing us a victory here.
"Now people who are adamantly claiming the contrary can’t find a source that supports them." I wont claim absolutely the contrary, just say that the public statements from the general Abizaid and Kimmitt contradicts your characterization. (Even if you found Conway says this was his idea and he loves it, you could raise the point that something is going on behind the scenes.)

So I'd do a Specter on your speculation about that and call it "not proven".

135 posted on 05/01/2004 10:50:57 AM PDT by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - I salute our brave fallen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
"I don’t have to prove the contrary, it’s obvious to all but a narrow minority who don’t want to believe their eyes. "

That is a cool form of argument: Argument-by-declaring-your-conclusion-obvious.
Hmmm, I'll try that next time I'm backed into a corner. :-)

Seriously, if it was true that this was NOT a military decision and it was forced on them, you should be able to drag up at least one of two quotes from a General somewhere in the chain of command indicating that view. The only thing obvious to a rational person who has watched and read what the Generals (Kimmitt, Conway, Abizaid) say is that they fully approve of this 'opportunity' to use Iraqis in Fallujah.

136 posted on 05/01/2004 11:29:45 AM PDT by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - I salute our brave fallen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: blam
Brilliant move to bring back the Baathis but outsourcing what should've been a decisive US victory in Falluja is OK, I guess.

But wearing his old uniform and his troops brandishing the old Iraki flag is rubbing it in to the Americans a little.
137 posted on 05/01/2004 11:32:57 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
"Why did I know that if I just remained polite, reasonable and resolute..."

Polite...debateable
Reasonable...definitely not
Resolute...like a stump.
And despite several direct quotes from DoD officials directly attributing the Marine decisions in Fallujah to Marines, you remain convinced you are right despite no evidence to support your position. If you were Arab, you'd call that a victory.

138 posted on 05/01/2004 2:11:47 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: blam
It's a good move, this mess is now put on the Iraqi people, if things go wrong we can step back in and right them.
139 posted on 05/01/2004 2:43:44 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
How in the world do you "deter" suicidal maniacs?



You equate each of their action to reactions that are much more powerful and destructive. For every suicide bombing, a bridge in Syria goes down, a chemical plant in Iran goes up in flames and a mosque or two blow up.
Word gets out. The Iraqis kill the maniacs.
140 posted on 05/01/2004 2:53:15 PM PDT by TomasUSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson