To: paul51; GeorgeW23225; EggsAckley; HitmanNY; Caipirabob; don'tbedenied; thoughtomator; ...
He's deaning out too early.
See also, this
"great minds think alike" thread:
Can the dems pull off another "Torricelli"???
3/19/04 | GeorgeW23225
Posted on 03/19/2004 9:52:39 AM PST by GeorgeW23225
While I am delighted with the recent polls that show Kerry is sinking faster than the Titanic, I worry about one thing. Even though he has the delegates needed to secure the nomination, does anyone know if these delegates are "legally" bound to vote for Kerry, or, can the dems pull off another "Torricelli" and nominate another candidate at their convention ???
If Kerry is "dead in the water" by the time the dems have their convention, I fear that they will nominate someone else, throwing the entire nominating process into chaos, as Hillary rides in on her white horse (Janet Reno) to save the party. Possible ?? Will it work ?? Is it legal ?? Or is this a scenario we should all pray for to happen ??
I just don't trust these people.......I'm afraid that they are so power hungry, that they will try ANYTHING to win.
What do you think ?? Anyone have any answers ?? Opinions ??
CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread
32 posted on
04/28/2004 2:37:31 AM PDT by
RonDog
To: RonDog; ken5050; GeorgeW23225; All
World Net News; Rush Limbaugh; persisting comments herein: I think that if Kerry continues to embarrass himself and the party, these thoughts will gather momentum and could become self fulfilling. Kerry is not the Democratic nominee until the DNC in Boston.
Again, I raise the question: "COULD it happen, and if so, HOW MIGHT IT IMPACT the Bush campaign's early definition media strategy?"
I believe the real wild-card in this is the limitations on campaign spending in the last 90-days.
82 posted on
04/28/2004 6:38:51 AM PDT by
mondoman
To: RonDog
If Kerry is "dead in the water" by the time the dems have their convention, I fear that they will nominate someone else, throwing the entire nominating process into chaos, Actually I thihk the conventions do have the right to nominate someon else. What I fear is that the DemocRATS will switch candidates a week or two before the election.
89 posted on
04/28/2004 7:28:35 AM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: RonDog
The irony is that it was Torricelli who helped Kerry in Iowa by surreptitiously planting damaging news about Dean.
To: RonDog
I don't put anything past the rats these days. I hope that the Bush team has enough of a election "War Chest" left when CFR comes into play. If Hillary steps in at the last minute, between that and talk radio, it's all we'll have to combat her "heinousness".
143 posted on
04/29/2004 5:42:00 AM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
To: RonDog
I'll take credit for being ahead of the curve on this one (at least I was ahead of Rush Limbaugh) but......I hope I'm wrong.
Kerry is proving to be a disaster for the demoRats. However, he has raised enough money that he should be able to isolate himself, and crush a potential "coup". If sucessful in "removing" Kerry, the demoRats might find themselves in a "pinch" for money. At least I hope so.....
152 posted on
04/29/2004 3:02:45 PM PDT by
GeorgeW23225
(Liberals really aren't bad people. It's just that they know so much that simply ISN'T true!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson