Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Americans sour on U.N.: New poll finds 44% have unfavorable view of global agency
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, April 28, 2004

Posted on 04/28/2004 12:02:28 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

THE NEW WORLD DISORDER Americans sour on U.N. New poll finds 44% have unfavorable view of global agency

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: April 28, 2004 1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

A new poll shows Americans' view of the United Nations in the last year has taken a significant nosedive.

Just 38 percent of likely voters have a favorable opinion of the U.N., while 44 percent have an unfavorable view, according to a poll conducted by Rasmussen Reports.

Feelings about the U.N. are considerably more negative from a year ago. Leading up to the Iraq war, 48 percent of Americans had a favorable opinion of the body, with just 31 percent holding an unfavorable view.

Those describing themselves as liberal voters had the highest opinion of the U.N., with 60 percent giving the agency thumbs-up. Just 20 percent of conservatives had a positive view, while nearly two-thirds, 62 percent, frowned on the global body.

Two-thirds of those who say they'll vote for President Bush in November have a negative impression of the U.N., whereas 59 percent of Kerry supporters view it positively.

The telephone survey of 1,000 likely voters was conducted by Rasmussen Reports April 25-26. The margin of sampling error for the full sample is plus-or-minus 3 percentage points, with a 95 percent level of confidence.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: un; unitiednations

1 posted on 04/28/2004 12:02:29 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Ping..
2 posted on 04/28/2004 12:02:45 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Am I allowed to say I support terrorist attacks against the UN???

Just asking =o)

3 posted on 04/28/2004 12:05:26 AM PDT by GeronL (We are the Lapdogs?? Woof Woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Refreshing that others may finally be catching on.
4 posted on 04/28/2004 12:06:28 AM PDT by Tactical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
That is precisely because the Ultimate Nonsence keeps siding with enemies and socialism over from what is right and what is wrong, or in the proverbial case, they keep siding with evil most of the time as opposed to what is really good.
5 posted on 04/28/2004 12:07:20 AM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
President Bush went to the UN twice in an effort to make the UN relevant in the war on terror, and sent Colin Powell to layout the case for Iraq in both open and closed sessions. Nothing worked. It's an irrelevant body when it comes to the international war on terror.

John Kerry has made the UN a cornerstone of his "foreign policy" which will be shown as equally irrelevant when the oil-for-food report comes out this summer.
6 posted on 04/28/2004 12:15:45 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Am I allowed to say I support terrorist attacks against the UN???

Man are you in trouble the UN Army will.....oh wait, no you are in no trouble.

7 posted on 04/28/2004 12:18:02 AM PDT by Texasforever (Will Rogers would slap John Kerry sensless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
I did not say I supported it, I was just asking if I was to say it. =o)
8 posted on 04/28/2004 12:22:20 AM PDT by GeronL (We are the Lapdogs?? Woof Woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
allowed to say it
9 posted on 04/28/2004 12:22:41 AM PDT by GeronL (We are the Lapdogs?? Woof Woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
LOL. Well I support it.
10 posted on 04/28/2004 12:23:14 AM PDT by Texasforever (Will Rogers would slap John Kerry sensless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
It is about freaking time!!
11 posted on 04/28/2004 12:38:57 AM PDT by Ruth A.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
LOL. Well I support it.

Let the bribes commence.
12 posted on 04/28/2004 12:41:07 AM PDT by farfromhome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: farfromhome
Let the bribes commence.

Commence? Hell from what I am reading they have been going on for years. The UN makes the Mafia look like chumps.

13 posted on 04/28/2004 12:43:47 AM PDT by Texasforever (Will Rogers would slap John Kerry sensless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The time has come for the headquarters for the U.N. to be moved out of the U.S.----- I nominate KABUL
14 posted on 04/28/2004 1:09:10 AM PDT by tsali
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsali
I nominate Beijing. Let the ChiComs put up with all the spies and NGOs that go with the UN HQ.

Of course, the ultimate choice would be for the US and Japan to no longer fund the UN, allowing it to wither and die a painful death.
15 posted on 04/28/2004 1:31:25 AM PDT by datura (Time to admit this is a war of Islam versus the US. They are ALL the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I would submit the Greek Cypriots with their 75% voter rejection of the "Annan Plan" for appeasement on April 24 constitutes an even larger rejection of the UN.

The media is ignoring this recent UN catastrophy because it makes the UN look truely impotent. (it was supposed to be an in-your-face to the USA over Iraq.)
16 posted on 04/28/2004 1:38:58 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsali
I nominate Paris.
It seems to be a perfect fit to me.
17 posted on 04/28/2004 7:43:03 AM PDT by nerdwithamachinegun (All generalizations are wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tsali
"I nominate KABUL"

Why inflict the poor Afghanis with the UN?
How about TEHRAN?
Or better yet, BRUSSELS ...

18 posted on 04/28/2004 7:52:14 AM PDT by BlueLancer (Der Elite Møøsënspåånkængrüppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Only 44% of us have wised up?
19 posted on 04/28/2004 8:00:04 AM PDT by JimRed (Fight election fraud! Volunteer as a local poll watcher, challenger or district official.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Those describing themselves as liberal voters had the highest opinion of the U.N., with 60 percent giving the agency thumbs-up.

Now that the truth of the UN corruption is beginning to be exposed even some liberals are taking notice. I am so glad that Kerry and the Dems have tied themselves to this sinking ship in regards to the war in Iraq. The UN was doing their best to keep Saddam in power so that the Oil for Food money kept comming in.

20 posted on 04/28/2004 9:17:32 AM PDT by eggman (Just another brick in the Clinton Legacy wall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson