Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Toomey vs Specter: Email Reply from Main Street Republican Partnership PAC
Email Reply from MainStreetPAC about Specter's Demeaning Radio Ads ^ | 4/27/04 | Self

Posted on 04/27/2004 11:42:52 AM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm

After returning from voting for Toomey this morning at 9:30am, I heard a pro-Specter radio ad on WSBA-910AM, to the effect that "a vote against Specter is a vote against Pennsylvania's Republican Party."

When I got back to work, I emailed them a taste of my dissatisfaction:

""a vote against specter is a vote against the republican party"? what's that all about?

how utterly stupid.

arlie sphincter is a back-stabbing liberal scumbag, who's screwed us here in penna, for 24 years. he's gone, after today. your stupid radio spot helped seal his doom, and changed a lot of peoples' minds to vote for toomey.

i talked to several angry fellow republican voters at the voting hall in york, pa, and they switched from sphincter to toomey, because of your demeaning and lying ad.

happy? we are; and thanks!"

********************

Here is their reply:

I am sorry that you have interpreted our ad that way. Let me explain why we are sending Pennsylvanians the message that “a vote against Specter is a vote against the Republican Party” and encourage you to reconsider voting for Senator Specter.

Neither the White House nor the Senate Republican leadership – that includes Senator Santorum – wanted Toomey to run, and they made that clear last winter before Toomey announced his candidacy. Even though Toomey knew he was running against the wishes of President Bush and Senate Republican leaders, he chose to run for the Senate anyway.

Secondly, the Club for Growth, a Washington, DC interest group, has poured over $2 million into Pat Toomey’s campaign. The Club for Growth’s leaders frequently criticize the White House and the President. And in a New York Times article earlier this month, the group’s executive director, David Keating, even went as far to say that the Club has “no loyalty to the Republican Party.” I am sending you some comments that Stephen Moore, the group’s President, and Keating have made about President Bush and his policies. If Toomey is the real Republican that he claims to be, then why is he taking so much money and from an organization that repeatedly attacks the President and his policies?

Lastly, the Club and Toomey have spread a lot of misinformation about Specter’s voting record. According to the non-partisan Congressional Quarterly, Specter voted with Bush 89 percent of the time in 2002 and 2003 and 87 percent in 2001. Specter has always been a supporter of President Bush, despite what his foes will tell you.

I hope that you find this information helpful.

“We have no loyalty to the Republican Party” -- Executive Director David Keating, New York Times, 4/11/04.

“We've had too much compassion from government, thank you. That is the biggest impediment to freedom and economic growth in America today. The State of Bush's Union has become in some ways a State of Dependency and a State of Entitlement” – Stephen Moore, National Review, 1/20/04.

“It’s a rather anemic goal, actually,” -- Stephen Moore on Bush’s deficit-reduction plan, AP, Dec. 18, 2003.

“George Bush doesn’t have an anti-government bone in his body. Compassionate conservatism means never having to say no” -- Stephen Moore, Time, 12/08/03

“My term for this is fiscal child abuse. Somebody is going to pay for Granny's drugs, and it's going to be Granny's grandkids” -- Stephen Moore on the Medicare-Rx bill, USA Today, 11/25/03.

“With the war over in Iraq and Saddam gone for good, we should be giving Iraq a hand up through capitalism, not a hand out through welfare.” – Stephen Moore on Bush’s request for Iraq reconstruction funding, National Review, 10/17/03

''I don't really like the Bush people very much. 'I was never part of a fraternity or anything like that, and the Bush White House is like a club'' – Stephen Moore, New York Times Magazine, 8/10/03

“ … we already have a Department of Homeland Security and that is called the Defense Department.” – Stephen Moore on the Department of Homeland Security, Fox News, 12/21/02

“We are doing everything we can to quash this appointment ... but who knows what will happen.” -- Stephen Moore on the appointment of White House Economic Adviser Stephen Friedman, USA Today, 12/11/02

“So we wound up last year with a wretched education bill that nearly doubled federal education spending and further implanted the Department of Education as a fixture in local school policy. The bill was a conservative policy setback that it will take years to dig out from under.” -- Stephen Moore on No Child Left Behind, Human Events, 5/27/02

"We're not well liked by [Republican National Committee] types. We do not have a good relationship," Stephen Moore, The Hill, 7/31/02


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Miscellaneous; Political Humor/Cartoons; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: defendingmainst; mainstpartnership; mainstreetpac; radioads; specter; stevelatourette; toomey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Anyone else in Pennsylvania hear those crummy ads? The Gary Sutton Show - http://www.wsba910.com/lineup/index.html - 9-12 EST, had a 15min segment on it; Rush mentioned it.
1 posted on 04/27/2004 11:42:54 AM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
I understand why W and Santorum would "have to" give nominal support to Specter (I think I'm correct in saying you haven't seen either on the Specter campaign trail).

I don't understand why the statewide GOP in PA doesn't just stay out of the way and let 'em duke it out. I know there are times when it makes sense to advise an amibitious person not to run for the good of the party, but given Arlen's liking of Scottish law, his pro-abort positions, and his torpedoing of Bork, he deserved to get a vigorous challenge.

Praying for a Toomey victory.......
2 posted on 04/27/2004 11:47:25 AM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
So apparently it's party over principle? Cronyism over conscience?
3 posted on 04/27/2004 11:49:09 AM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (Is Arlen Specter a conservative Republican? Umm... "Not proven.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
"Neither the White House nor the Senate Republican leadership – that includes Senator Santorum – wanted Toomey to run, and they made that clear last winter before Toomey announced his candidacy."

What a shock, they don't want a true conservative to run and instead would rather keep their rino sitting in washington sitting fat and happy.

The GOP internally is turning out to be no better than the dems.

In Ohio there was actually a plan by a member in the state GOP to attack one of our most conservative republicans in state government, Ken Blackwell. The press has been all over it since the plan got leaked.
4 posted on 04/27/2004 11:50:09 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Go Toomey Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
"(I think I'm correct in saying you haven't seen either on the Specter campaign trail)"

I thought I heard a news report about Bush and rectorum showing up at a campaign stop.
5 posted on 04/27/2004 11:52:04 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Go Toomey Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
Bush has been on the campaign trail a couple times, making appearances with Liberal Arlen.
6 posted on 04/27/2004 11:55:14 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
According to the non-partisan Congressional Quarterly, Specter voted with Bush 89 percent of the time in 2002 and 2003 and 87 percent in 2001.

87 percent in 2001??????
That is a flat out BALD FACED LIE!

See my post http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1122733/posts for the real facts taken directly from the U.S. Senates official website!
7 posted on 04/27/2004 11:58:50 AM PDT by cuz_it_aint_their_money (24 years of Snarlin Arlen's Liberalism is enough! Vote Pat Toomey for U.S. Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
With such suave mannerisms, it is surprising that someone as strikingly tough as Specter would need to stoop that low.

Yeah baby yeah, grrrr!

8 posted on 04/27/2004 12:00:44 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (I am no longer afraid to publicly say I love Jesus, thanks Mel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
I am deeply saddened that W would waste precious time actively campaigning for Arlen Sphincter.

If Toomey wins, the mainstream press will interpret it as a slap to Bush.

Karl Rove needs to get a major strategery grip.
9 posted on 04/27/2004 12:02:15 PM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
If Toomey is the real Republican that he claims to be, then why is he taking so much money and from an organization that repeatedly attacks the President and his policies?

The Club for Growth are supply side Republicans in the tradition of Ronald Reagan. The real question is why has Specter taken money from looney-left George Soros?

Also, does anyone here disagree with any of the policy positions described in the quotes from Stephen Moore? I sure don't.

10 posted on 04/27/2004 12:06:40 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
Thanks to Specter, Robert Bork got "Borked".
11 posted on 04/27/2004 12:09:30 PM PDT by Ron in Acreage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
Is that a wax figure or a real person?

He looks like he's about to melt...

12 posted on 04/27/2004 12:09:48 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MNLDS
Sounds like the Republican official's idea of a good Republican is a cool aid drinker.
13 posted on 04/27/2004 12:12:50 PM PDT by Honestfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MNLDS
Holding my nose, I voted for Specter today.

For me it was a vote of party over principle.

I voted for Specter because he has a political machine that may help Bush win PA. If Specter is gone, then that organization is weakened. If Bush can win PA, it's game over for the Dems.

I never ever ever thought I would vote for Specter. He leaves a bad taste in my mouth. But today, I voted for the party. A Dem in the white house would be worse than Specter in PA.

Politics is never cut and dry. And no matter what happens this time, I win and loose. I want Toomey. I need Specter. Or so my reasoning goes.
14 posted on 04/27/2004 12:13:02 PM PDT by Tao Yin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
If I were undecided in PA, the quotes from the Club for Growth people would make up my mind.

I'd vote for Toomey.

GWB is better than any alternatives, and has done a good job in a number of areas, but he (and the GOP) aren't very conservative.

The idea that Party (or personality) before principles is the reason why we find ourselves with a Federal Government bloated like a tumor tapping into a vein.

15 posted on 04/27/2004 12:13:25 PM PDT by cryptical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
Here are some quotes to send back to those RINOs:

Welfare's purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for its own existence.
January 7, 1970

It is not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work -- work with us, not over us; stand by our side, not ride on our back. Government can and must provide opportunity, not smother it; foster productivity, not stifle it.
January 20, 1981

We who live in free market societies believe that growth, prosperity and ultimately human fulfillment, are created from the bottom up, not the government down. Only when the human spirit is allowed to invent and create, only when individuals are given a personal stake in deciding economic policies and benefitting from their success -- only then can societies remain economically alive, dynamic, progressive, and free. Trust the people. This is the one irrefutable lesson of the entire postwar period contradicting the notion that rigid government controls are essential to economic development.
September 29, 1981

The size of the federal budget is not an appropriate barometer of social conscience or charitable concern.
October 5, 1981

Government is the people's business and every man, woman and child becomes a shareholder with the first penny of tax paid.
January 14, 1982

We don't have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven't taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much.
March 28, 1982

Government growing beyond our consent had become a lumbering giant, slamming shut the gates of opportunity, threatening to crush the very roots of our freedom. What brought America back? The American people brought us back -- with quiet courage and common sense; with undying faith that in this nation under God the future will be ours, for the future belongs to the free.
February 4, 1986

[G]overnment's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
August 15, 1986

We've done our part. And as I walk off into the city streets, a final word to the men and women of the Reagan revolution, the men and women across America who for 8 years did the work that brought America back. My friends: We did it. We weren't just marking time. We made a difference. We made the city stronger, we made the city freer, and we left her in good hands. All in all, not bad, not bad at all.
January 20th, 1989

Ronald Wilson Reagan, 40th President of the United States

16 posted on 04/27/2004 12:17:56 PM PDT by Dahoser (9/11---The Legacy of Clinton treating terrorism as a law enforcement issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
"The Mainstream Republican PAC" is the group that Soros is funding, is that correct? They just shot themselves in the foot, or as the case may be, head. I heard the ad (unfortunately, I am just across the state border...thus I cannot go vote for Toomey, but I would if I could. It was despicable. They tried to make it clear that it wasn't directly from Specter, but I cannot see how the backlash from it could do anything but hurt him.

It was so bad, I have to wonder if it was deliberate. The real question is why Soros is supporting Specter, is it to keep a liberal republican RINO in his seat, or to have a real conservative they think they can beat. A dem won't unseat Specter, whereas with Toomey at least it will be a race. I think it is a race it is worth having and winning, but I am wondering about Soros' logic. Was he trying to help Specter or torpedo him?
17 posted on 04/27/2004 12:20:13 PM PDT by blanknoone (Vote GWB in 04 or your great grand daughter WILL wear a Burqa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
Well, at least you got a reply...FWIW, my take is that initially, Specter had Bush and Santorum over a barrel. If they had refused to actively support him, he would have done a Jeffords....they had no choice...
18 posted on 04/27/2004 12:23:30 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tao Yin
I respectfully disagree with your reason to vote Specter.

Toomey will get people out to vote who haven't voted before, or who just plain dislike Specter. He will also have plenty of access to experienced grass-roots organizers (like prolifers and NRA) who know how to find these people and motivate them.
19 posted on 04/27/2004 12:26:18 PM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
That's the best explanation I've heard yet as to why Santorum and Bush are "on board." Wish you had proof for your claim.
20 posted on 04/27/2004 12:27:37 PM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson