[AFPhys]

Get back on your meds and wait a month, then re-read my posts#301 and 307 again carefully.

I never accuse you in the analogy of letting SH go free. I state that if I were on an jury for murder and had similar quality evidence I would convict but not to condemn to death, and you clearly have chosen in this discussion to not convict on the basis of similar evidence.

Your calling people liars simply because you fail to correctly read and comprehend what you read appears rather paranoid, or something like that - I'm not a psychologist, though.

[lugsoul]

"You choose to let the perp walk free."

"I never accuse you in the analogy of letting SH go free."

Well, were you lying then, or are you lying now?

"you clearly have chosen in this discussion to not convict on the basis of similar evidence." - it is also amazing that you can malign someone else's reading comprehension and make this statement. The only thing I have claimed is that the piece of "evidence" that is the subject of THIS article is not conclusive evidence of anything. At no time have I even addressed the cumulative evidence of a connection, or the lack thereof. This is just one more thing you are making up.