[lugsoul]

You are still running misdirection.

I know it is hard for you, so let me lay it out step-by-step.

1) The initial premise of this article and its boosting posts is that the confession that this Jordan terrorist hooked up with Ansar in Iraq is "proof-positive" of the link.

2) The premise of my reply is that THIS ONE FACT is not proof-positive of anything, because Ansar was not in Saddam-controlled Iraq.

3) You replied that the Kurds did not control NE Iraq.

4) I asked for any proof of your assertion.

5) You have provided none.

[WOSG]

"Ansar was not in Saddam-controlled Iraq. "

excuse me for butting in, but Saddam supported several terrorist groups outside his country in places he didnt 'control'. NFLP for example.

Right now, we have evidence Iran is bankrolling al-Sadr in Iraq. Of course nobody would say Iran is 'controlling' Iraqi territory.

So my Q: How does this assertion/argument prove anything dispositive?

[AFPhys]

Misdirection? You are speaking of MY misdirection? ROFL!

I continue to maintain what I posted in 301 & 307. I never argued your #1. I have never claimed your silly #2. I have argued evidence for your #3 & #4, and many other FReepers on this thread have provided further argument which I already said I will not restate. If you wish to, I am certain you are capable of adding to the evidence against your position.

As discussed with you by Dr. Frank fan, Beckwith, MizSterious, WOSG, ex 98C MI Dude, and others on this thread, the preponderance of the evidence says (whether we are discussing AlQ<>Hussein or AaI<>Hussein) GUILTY, as I already decreed.

You choose to let the perp walk free; I choose to rid society of his threat.

I hope for my daughter's sake you are never put on such a jury.