Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muskogee
A well armed citizenry with a government policy of tight borders and a decentralized security apparatus would have prevented it, but that is just how I, as a conservative, sees it. Feel free to disagree, it your prerogative.
161 posted on 04/27/2004 9:45:09 AM PDT by JohnGalt (Chalabi Republicans: Soft on Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: JohnGalt
A well armed citizenry with a government policy of tight borders and a decentralized security apparatus would have prevented it, but that is just how I, as a conservative, sees it.

Let's see here - this raises some questions. Number one, how do you know this is correct? Perhaps you can cite an example? Number two, would the above proposal prevent future attacks? Your reference to a dencentralized security apparatus is...well, it's humorous. Please support how something such as that could identify security threats that have been here for years (and no, you cannot state "had our borders been closed in the first place", because that is an "if", not reality).

As far as my priorities being incorrect, I'll repeat myself:

Liberty, free trade, adherence to the Consitution, minimal government, etc., are all great things....and completely useless when you cannot protect yourself.

Mexico isn't knocking down our towers. China...well, China is for a different thread altogether. At least we keep our military compeltely superior to them.

173 posted on 04/27/2004 10:01:32 AM PDT by Shryke (Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson