Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Professor Edward W. Younkins gives us a brief but richly detailed overview of the philosophy of Aristotle, illustrating the connection between that philosophy and Ayn Rand's Objectivism. Ayn Rand acknowledged Aristotle as the only philosopher to whom she was indebted.
1 posted on 04/26/2004 6:09:25 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Hank Kerchief
They also both had a predilection for young men.
2 posted on 04/26/2004 6:10:47 PM PDT by sharktrager (The greatest strength of our Republic is that the people get the government they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fzob; P.O.E.; PeterPrinciple; reflecting; DannyTN; FourtySeven; x; dyed_in_the_wool; Zon; ...
PHILOSOPHY PING

(If you want on or off this list please freepmail me.)

Hank

3 posted on 04/26/2004 6:11:42 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hank Kerchief
I never could finsih Fountainhead. I was sad to learn that Ann was an atheist.
4 posted on 04/26/2004 6:12:00 PM PDT by NotchJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hank Kerchief
Excellent article.

Question: Did Aristotle believe in a god/gods or was he an atheist?

6 posted on 04/26/2004 6:17:39 PM PDT by Ronzo (GOD alone is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hank Kerchief
Have you read Aristotle's metaphysics? Do you really think this is an accurate representation of his stance on essence?
8 posted on 04/26/2004 6:18:52 PM PDT by PianoMan (And now back to practicing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hank Kerchief
Because of Rand, we have had a rebirth of Aristotelian philosophy with its emphasis on reason and on man the thinker and doer.

That's incredible. She did that?

Rand will be acknowledged as a great philosopher when Aristotle is forgotten but not before that time

13 posted on 04/26/2004 6:30:05 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy ("Despise not the jester. Often he is the only one speaking the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hank Kerchief
bump for later read
14 posted on 04/26/2004 6:33:13 PM PDT by tophat9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hank Kerchief
Ayn Rand was a tyrannical old sot.
16 posted on 04/26/2004 6:43:05 PM PDT by annyokie (There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hank Kerchief
What would Rand say about Tillman?
29 posted on 04/26/2004 7:11:17 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hank Kerchief
ping
51 posted on 04/26/2004 8:39:45 PM PDT by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs Zip
ping
58 posted on 04/26/2004 10:10:41 PM PDT by zip (Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough became truth to 42% of americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hank Kerchief; All
Thanks for the ping.

A bit of rambling rant here:
I grow so weary of mindless sheep using ordained excuses to jump on any they are told don't run with the herd.

Republicans don't starve children, or lynch blacks.

Libertarians are not godless, or without any base philosophy, and don't look to Rand as their leader.

I am a conservative, and remain a Republican, despite the influx of sheeple. Libertarians are conservatives, and have my respect.

I expect lies, and propoganda from liberals. It sours my Republican party when so many, so easily attack with those same mindless, liberal tools.

67 posted on 04/27/2004 8:44:04 AM PDT by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hank Kerchief


Atlas Shrugged is the book that started me down the path to embracing human liberty, but I've been on a Rothbard kick for a couple of years now and thought you all might like this essay:


http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard23.html


The Sociology of the Ayn Rand Cult


by Murray N. Rothbard


Written in 1972, this was the first piece of Rand revisionism from the libertarian standpoint.


In the America of the 1970s we are all too familiar with the religious cult, which has been proliferating in the last decade. Characteristic of the cult (from Hare Krishna to the "Moonies" to EST to Scientology to the Manson Family) is the dominance of the guru, or Maximum Leader, who is also the creator and ultimate interpreter of a given creed to which the acolyte must be unswervingly loyal. The major if not the only qualification for membership and advancement in the cult is absolute loyalty to and adoration of the guru, and absolute and unquestioning obedience to his commands. The lives of the members are dominated by the guru’s influence and presence. If the cult grows beyond a few members, it naturally becomes hierarchically structured, if only because the guru cannot spend his time indoctrinating and watching over every disciple. Top positions in the hierarchy are generally filled by the original handful of disciples, who come to assume these positions by virtue of their longer stint of loyal and devoted service. Sometimes the top leadership may be related to each other, a useful occurrence which can strengthen intra-cult loyalty through the familial bond.


The goals of the cult leadership are money and power. Power is achieved over the minds of the disciples through inducing them to accept without question the guru and his creed. This devotion is enforced through psychological sanctions. For once the acolyte is imbued with the view that approval of, and communication with, the guru are essential to his life, then the implicit and explicit threat of excommunication – of removal from the direct or indirect presence of the guru – creates a powerful psychological sanction for the "enforcement" of loyalty and obedience. Money flows upward from the members through the hierarchy, either in the form of volunteer labor service contributed by the members, or through cash payments.

68 posted on 04/27/2004 10:59:30 AM PDT by society-by-contract
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hank Kerchief; PatrickHenry; Alamo-Girl; marron; unspun; Diamond; beckett; xzins; restornu; ...
eudaimonia

Interesting word, Hank. It means the human happiness that derives from being "one with the God," of participating in and reflecting the divine nature to the fullest extent that human nature admits. This is the goal of the spoudaious, the wise or "mature" man -- the goal of reason itself. (Note the word spoudaious incorporates the root that references God.)

The fact is (made very clear in Nichomachean Ethics) that Aristotle believed in God, and saw the entire moral universe as having its source in the divine. In this he followed his great teacher, Plato.

I'm afraid Ms. Rand -- atheist and proud of it -- has edited this part of Aristotelian thought out of the portrait of her "greatest philosopher." However, she kept the parts that confirmed her own views. With this maneuver, she tended to falsify this great philosopher every time she spoke of him.

Good post, Hank. Thanks!

69 posted on 04/27/2004 11:02:43 AM PDT by betty boop (The purpose of marriage is to civilize men, protect women, and raise children. -- William Bennett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson