To: hope
Well Gibson said he saw Kerry throw medals.
And Kerry himself has said in the past he threw medals.
3 posted on
04/26/2004 5:06:57 PM PDT by
Peach
To: Peach
OMG, a closed fist around the collection? Hahaha! What's next?
To: Peach
He is also a self confessed war criminal? That makes him either delusional or a war criminaql and I want neither as the President of the USA.
10 posted on
04/26/2004 5:09:37 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Peach
How does one throw a ribbon across a fence?
To: Peach
And Kerry himself has said in the past he threw medals.
Exactly. Kerry said he threw medals of other veterans and his own ribbons. Oliphant's daughter also happens to be part of the Kerry campaign. LOL. Let's go to the video tape.
31 posted on
04/26/2004 5:19:58 PM PDT by
kabar
To: Peach
You learn all you need of Oliphant when you ask why he didn't speak up to clear the record when Kerrey said on television that he did throw his medals.
Situational ethics = a congenital failing of democrats!
The real lesson from all this is how Kerrey will lie, depending on his audience. And sadly, how his supporters don't care if he lied.
He threw his medals. He didn't throw his medals. He threw ribbons, not medals. But, he said, there was no difference in ribbons and medals, both were symbols, so why is he the one to insist on the distinction of the two?
40 posted on
04/26/2004 5:22:38 PM PDT by
YaYa123
(@The Lies, The Lies.com)
To: Peach
So Kerry threw his ribbons over the fence on 4/23/71. Hmmmm, I find it ironic he was wearing them when he testified before Congress later on 4/23/71. :)
62 posted on
04/26/2004 5:30:08 PM PDT by
GarySpFc
To: Peach
"Well Gibson said he saw Kerry throw medals. "
thought Kerry said he threw medals belonging to "others/someone else". . .or were they 'ribbons' as well; since they are interchangeable by Kerry's definition. . .or just his 'ribbons/medals or their medals/ribbons?
Oliphants statement seems to me to be, beside the point; we know he threw something; it's just that Kerry cannot get to the truth of the matter regarding what it is he threw and who it belonged to.
How is it that Oliphant's memory should have more clarity that the 'man himself'.
If Kerry would just stick to one script; there would be little to say; save that he is still a 'hero/president wannabe'.
173 posted on
04/26/2004 7:10:51 PM PDT by
cricket
(Terrorists are weapons of mass destruction. . .)
To: Peach
THANK YOU, THAT IS THE HEART OF THE MATTER. GIBSON AND KERRY BOTH SAY KERRY DID IT--OLIPHANT IS A HACK.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson