Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Lando
1 posted on 04/26/2004 7:32:56 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
I firmly believe that if the "Oil for Food" scandal is investigated to its complete conclusion, it will reveal that the UN weapons inspections were also compromised by payoffs.

Lando

2 posted on 04/26/2004 7:36:02 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln (GWB in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

I firmly believe that if the "Oil for Food" scandal is investigated to its complete conclusion, it will reveal that the UN weapons inspections were also compromised by payoffs.

Lando

3 posted on 04/26/2004 7:36:07 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln (GWB in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Bump!
4 posted on 04/26/2004 7:36:50 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
I, like the majority of Americans have never doubted that Saddam had WMDs, but Bush needs to come out and give an address about just what has been discovered.

I suspect Bush will be doing this shortly before the Democrat Convention.
5 posted on 04/26/2004 7:38:29 AM PDT by counterpunch (<-CLICK HERE for my CARTOONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
But this stunning news has received little attention from the major media

What a surprise.

6 posted on 04/26/2004 7:39:25 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
BUMP!
7 posted on 04/26/2004 7:40:19 AM PDT by jmstein7 (Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
But this stunning news has received little attention from the major media

Imagine that?

8 posted on 04/26/2004 7:40:25 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Great News !
9 posted on 04/26/2004 7:40:35 AM PDT by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Nearly a year ago someone I knew in the ISG said that there were smoking guns.

There's a whole lot more going on than any of us know. And that may not be a bad thing.
11 posted on 04/26/2004 7:41:30 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (Coming to you live from HESCO city...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
We need to look in the places we have not looked yet:

Iraqis oh-so-holy mosques. What better palce to hide WMD?
12 posted on 04/26/2004 7:42:21 AM PDT by Iron Matron (Civil Disobedience? It's not just for liberals anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mitchell; Shermy
ping
13 posted on 04/26/2004 7:44:33 AM PDT by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Bump for later reading - looks fascinating.
14 posted on 04/26/2004 7:45:23 AM PDT by ride the whirlwind (We can't let Kerry win - an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
We did not have to prove Saddam had WMD. He had to prove he didn't.
15 posted on 04/26/2004 7:46:10 AM PDT by petercooper (You'll get nothing and like it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Excellent summary, thanks for posting this informative recap. Last week, Timmerman exposed the duplicity of Chiraq and de Villipen when voicing their support for the war in Iraq and then suddenly withdrawing it. (I'm still boycotting all things French.) Now, I'll just sit here and hold my breath until the lamestream covers this.
16 posted on 04/26/2004 7:46:59 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln; Howlin; FairOpinion; backhoe; redlipstick; cyncooper; MEG33; Grampa Dave; ...
Much of this is not news to many of us who have gathered up the snippets of these stories where we could find them. Nevertheless, it leaves me wondering: why the heck isn't the Bush admin out there making this point? Timmerman lays it all out neatly; they could use his outline.
17 posted on 04/26/2004 7:48:15 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Bump to read later
20 posted on 04/26/2004 7:51:12 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Bump for a fascinating read.

Sending this to some liberals who don't want to let the facts get in the way of their opinions.
21 posted on 04/26/2004 7:51:43 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Wasn't there supposed to be some explosive revelation at a hearing on the oil for food program? I haven't heard anything.

As for the article, yes, Iraq had remnants of WMD programs. Yes, Iraq had many many violations of UN resolutions.

But, the lede of the story makes it sound like lots of WMD have been found and the press is not reporting it. That is just not true.

Very few actual cases of WMD are reported in this article, such as: "Reference strains" of a wide variety of biological-weapons agents were found beneath the sink in the home of a prominent Iraqi BW scientist."

BIG WHOOP! So they had something with which they could restart their program with. It doesn't prove they had produced WMD's and had them right before or during our invasion.

Furthermore, this article has a lot of "may" and "might" speculations about what things were used for. Yes, they probably were used for weapons, but may or might is not the same as WE CAN PROVE THEY WERE.

I firmly believe Iraq did have them, that our intelligence was correct.

But, I sure as heck won't allow someone to sex up our findings beyond what they are.

They do not support the conclusion that Iraq had WMD's at the time of our arrival and it is A LIE to say otherwise.

That is our finding....at least as of yet. This probably will change as time goes on once we found out where the weapons are hidden.
24 posted on 04/26/2004 7:53:20 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Curious that the map in the article shows Falluja isn't it? You got to wonder why the fighting, might be the reason.
25 posted on 04/26/2004 7:54:20 AM PDT by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
"It seems Iraqi soldiers were obsessed with keeping ammo dumps insect-free..."

"Danish forces found 120-millimeter mortar shells filled with a mysterious liquid that initially tested positive for blister agents. But subsequent tests by the United States disputed that finding. "If it wasn't a chemical agent, what was it?" Hanson asks. "More pesticides? Dish-washing detergent?"

It's obvious to me that the Iraqi military was very neat and clean. Not only did they want themselves flea-free, but the wanted to kill only clean enemies. What's the point of doing something if you don't look great doing it, right?

26 posted on 04/26/2004 7:54:59 AM PDT by rudypoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson