Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: victoryatallcosts
Understand- under LBJ the White House regularly micro-managed the details of military operations, ruled various targets off-limits for no good reason, and dictated a strategy which maximized the number of forces in-country while minimizing their potential uses.

And this is different from the current Iraq situation (with specific regard to backing off the insurgents in Fallujah) how exactly?

61 posted on 04/25/2004 5:49:53 PM PDT by Prime Choice (Leftists claim Bush is a terrorist. So why aren't they trying to appease him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Prime Choice
Because you have no idea of what happened beyond a little snippet on the Drudge Report. Further, this was clearly a strategic decision, not a tactical one. He'd be micro-managing if he was deciding which buildings to storm and which not to storm and what sort of ammunition the Marines were allowed to use. Deciding if a major offensive, involving thousands of men, should be launched or not launched is a decision which, in this situation, properly rests with the Commander-in-Chief.
77 posted on 04/25/2004 5:53:47 PM PDT by victoryatallcosts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson