Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drug Makers Hope to Kill the Kick in Pain Relief
NY Times ^ | April 20, 2004 | SANDRA BLAKESLEE

Posted on 04/23/2004 4:22:42 PM PDT by neverdem

Worried that millions of Americans are using prescription opiate painkillers to get high rather than to ease severe chronic pain, drug makers are working on ways to prevent abuse.

Cooperating closely with government officials and pain specialists, the companies are educating doctors, rewriting warning labels and tracking pills as they move from pharmacy to patient.

They are also reformulating pills with added ingredients. One combination blocks euphoria. Another produces a nasty burning sensation.

"The problem of prescription painkiller abuse is much bigger than people realize," said Dr. Clifford Woolf, director of the neural plasticity group and professor of anesthesia research at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston and Harvard Medical School.

"No other drug type in the last 20 years had been so abused in such a short period of time," he said. "It's an epidemic."

According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, more Americans abuse prescription opiates than cocaine and the abusers far outnumber those who misuse tranquilizers, stimulants, hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants or sedatives. After marijuana, pain pills are the drug of choice for America's teenagers and young adults.

How modern painkillers came to be abused is a story of good intentions gone awry. The painkilling action of the opium poppy has been known for thousands of years. Misuse of painkillers also has a long history. A century ago, mothers routinely rubbed tincture of opium on the gums of teething babies to soothe the pain, then took a nip for themselves.

If the medicine was not locked up, other family members often helped themselves. Indeed, the problem got so bad that makers of paregoric, the most popular liquid opiate, added camphor to their formulations to set off a gag reflex.

In recent decades, doctors stopped prescribing opiates because 5 to 10 percent of people who took them became addicted.

Fear of addiction led to the undertreatment of pain and to untold suffering, said Dr. Russ Portenoy, chairman of the department of pain medicine and palliative care at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York.

The 50 million Americans with chronic pain needed help. It arrived five or six years ago when pharmaceutical companies put very large doses of opiates into slow-release formulations. A person who swallows such a pill feels no euphoria but is relieved of pain for up to 24 hours.

The new painkillers were heavily marketed to primary care physicians, Dr. Portenoy said. It was thought that the drugs would not be abused because addicts would not be tempted by sustained release painkillers.

Unfortunately, addicts quickly found that they could grind the pills, swallow or snort the powder and get a high dose of opiates delivered directly into their bloodstreams. They also liked the fact that the drugs were pure and the exact dosage was known.

To counter abuse, drug makers are developing ways to reformulate prescription painkillers. Purdue Pharma in Stamford, Conn., which makes OxyContin, is thinking of adding a second drug, called an opiate antagonist, that neutralizes the effects of the opiate.

The antagonist would be walled off using polymers or some other sequestering technique, said Dr. David Haddox, the company's vice president of health policy.

A patient who swallowed the drug would get full pain relief, as intended. But if someone tampered with the pills, the antagonist would be released.

Then, Dr. Haddox said, one of two things would happen: "If you are a recreational drug user, you feel nothing. The effect is canceled out.

"Why abuse something that has the same effects as a glass of water?"

"But if you are physically dependent," he continued, "you get no euphoria and it might cause withdrawal. You'd get a double whammy."

A second approach is to mix in a chemical irritant like capsaicin, the main ingredient of hot chili peppers, said Dr. Woolf, who has a patent on the idea.

Because the esophagus and stomach do not have many receptors for hot peppers, patients could take the pills as prescribed and find relief, he said. But the lining of the nose and cheeks are loaded with pepper receptors, and anyone who ground up such a pill would get a burning feeling in the chest, face, rectum and extremities, as well as paroxysmal coughing.

Reformulations are a promising avenue, but there are risks.

"We want to make sure that a patient who has need of an opioid does not suffer side effects from a second drug for which he or she has no need," Dr. Haddox said.

"We need to make sure the antagonist doesn't leak," he added.

Approaching the problem from another direction, drug companies and the federal authorities are trying to educate doctors and crack down on doctors who, for whatever reason, dispense painkillers inappropriately.

The Food and Drug Administration, Dr. Portenoy said, is going after doctors who are "duped, dishonest, disabled or dated."

For example, the agency is relabeling prescription painkillers to warn primary physicians of the risks involved. Some doctors, he said, are using the new drugs for broken fingers rather than devastating chronic pain.

New labels are also being introduced to tell doctors how to recognize patients who may be prone to abuse — those with a personal or family history of alcohol or prior drug abuse or mental health problems like bipolar disease, for example — and if the doctor is suspicious, how to monitor those patients with urine tests or other methods.

Some patients go doctor shopping, obtaining prescriptions from a dozen or more family physicians. Others tamper with prescriptions. To address this, drug manufacturers are providing doctors with tamperproof prescription pads that make forgeries difficult. When a prescription is photocopied, the copies say "void."

Doctors are also being taught how to write prescriptions more carefully. Instead of writing 14 pills, which a patient could alter to 140, the doctor writes out the word fourteen. Doctors are also being urged to lock up their prescription pads in the same way they would personal checks.

The Drug Enforcement Administration registers all people who handle opiates, inspects the documentation of opiate distribution, controls imports and exports and oversees the amount of the drugs produced, bought, sold or otherwise transferred. Yet, despite these controls, large amounts of prescription painkillers are being stolen once the drugs move into the hands of pharmacies, doctors and patients. Armed robberies, night break-ins and employee thefts are common.

In the face of so much criminal activity, the drug agency is stepping up efforts to prosecute dishonest pharmacists and doctors who sell opiates for personal profit and to use computer search programs and other means to close down so-called pill mills on the Internet. Electronic prescription monitoring systems are being enlisted. If the same prescription goes to 15 pharmacies, the computer system will sound an alarm.

Still, drug addicts will continue to find ways to foil the efforts to foil them.

People who came to like paregoric learned to boil the liquid, which removed all traces of camphor. The dregs were pure tincture of opium.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Massachusetts; US: New York
KEYWORDS: capsaicin; chronicpain; dea; opiateabuse; opiateantagonist; opiatedependence; opiates; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last
To: Monty22
Well, yes, but people who wish to use painkillers legitimately are not going to grind them up, anyhow. The only purpose of these additives is to prevent people from grinding up extended-release tablets..
21 posted on 04/23/2004 5:33:03 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
And preventing people from doing that is bad.. how?
22 posted on 04/23/2004 5:35:03 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
I don't think it's bad; I think it's futile for the purpose that it's intended. The people who want to grind them up will simply make sure they get those without additives, or if worse comes to worse (for them) they'll find some other means to get the fix altogether.

The people who grind up narcotics are relatively hard-core addicts. This is not going to stop them.

23 posted on 04/23/2004 5:37:46 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
It won't stop them, but it'll make it harder. I don't have a problem with making criminal activity harder.

Why would anyone? It'll help people from taking more than they should due to tolerance, which will drastically cut down the accidental addict issue.

This is a good thing, all around. People that want to get off on chemicals are criminals, and need to be treated as such.

The vast majority that want to be relieved from pain will, with these steps, be less likely to turn into that kind of criminal, and will have better chances for living a normal life.
24 posted on 04/23/2004 5:40:22 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
The solution in the sense you mean would be to synthesize and equally effective, nonaddictive painkiller. The other solution is to put an end to overprescribing by doctors (the biggest problem).

My guess is that this proposed tactic will not even make it any much harder. What it may do is lead some criminal dealers who hijack shipments or rob pharmacies whatnot to pick up some pills that are useless to them. The 'inside' jobs won't be impacted because they'll know to avoid these pills. Routine addicts won't be affected to any great extent unless all the other pills are banned, which won't happen.

Odds are that the biggest impact will be some number of people paying more for pills than they need to because they are the law-abiding who don't have a problem anyhow and thus don't need them. In theory, this might help some handful of them avoid inadvertent addiction, although there are plenty of alternatives available for those who wish that, anyhow.

The ultimate solution is to end the Prohibition War and substitute harm-reduction legal & medical policies in its place. But that's not gonna happen anytime soon.
25 posted on 04/23/2004 5:48:57 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
People that want to get off on chemicals are criminals

Which chemicals, and why?

26 posted on 04/23/2004 5:49:14 PM PDT by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Oh, and it definitely goes without saying that this...

People that want to get off on chemicals are criminals

...is absolutely false on its face.

27 posted on 04/23/2004 5:50:52 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
They obviously can make nonaddictive painkillers, they're already doing it well.. Celebrex and Ultram are great.

For mild to moderate pain many analgesics will suffice, but for severe pain, especially when it's chronic, only opiates can cut the mustard. BTW, Ultram, aka tramadol, is a semi-synthetic opiate, and a relatively small number of folks have become addicted to it, IIRC. It does have abuse potential.

28 posted on 04/23/2004 6:37:48 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Nah. The number of reported 'capsaicin allergies' will merely spike, just like the number of reported 'aspirin/NSAID allergies' did some while back...

I don't follow. Could you explain?

29 posted on 04/23/2004 6:41:32 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
Yeah, heaven forbid that someone in pain should experience anything that feels good or makes the pain more tolerable when it can't be completely eliminated

There is a chasm of a difference between a pain blocker and an euphoira inducing drug. But, I bet you already knew that.

30 posted on 04/23/2004 6:45:41 PM PDT by ShadowDancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I don't use painkillers, but they better never take the sleepyness out of my NyQuil.
31 posted on 04/23/2004 6:46:06 PM PDT by ryanjb2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
When alternatives to narcotics came out (i.e., Celebrex, Ultram,Vioxx) addicts merely found out what was in them and then reported allergies to some component if a physician wanted to prescribe them..

BTW, genuine capsaicin allergy can be quite vicious.
32 posted on 04/23/2004 6:47:13 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
No, illegal drug possession is a criminal behavior, so is prescription abuse. It's maybe 'false' in your fantasyland, but in the real world, it's how it is.
33 posted on 04/23/2004 6:53:17 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
I'd like to see the opiates phased out as something much better comes along.

Do you remember hearing about endorphins, i.e. a contraction of endogenous morphine. Our bodies have specific receptors for beta-endorphin and enkephalins on nerves that mediate pain. The opiates fit in those receptors like the right key for a lock. I'll be quite surprised if opiates are ever phased out.

34 posted on 04/23/2004 6:54:33 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The more they are phased out, the better. Then we'll have effective, non addictive medication. It's the ultimate quest in pharmaceuticals. No addiction, no high, but treatment of the problem.

And progress is being made.
35 posted on 04/23/2004 6:58:09 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
You didn't say illegal drug possession or prescription abuse (which the latter is not illegal per se, btw). You said getting off on chemicals. Maybe grammar and definitions don't exist in your fantasyland, but here in the reality you need to say what you mean.

BTW, I unfortunately have a weakness for the chemicals in bacon double quarter pounders with cheese. Doesn't do anything for my waistline but I don't think it's criminal ... yet.
36 posted on 04/23/2004 7:01:04 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Celebrex and Ultram are great.

Sure. But it would be nonsensical to think that they--especially Celebrex--have the analgesic potency of opiates.

37 posted on 04/23/2004 7:04:16 PM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
The ultimate quest in pharmaceuticals is a cure for aging, followed closely by a cure for cancer, followed closely by a cure for heart disease, followed closely by cures for several infectious diseases. Maybe in your fantasyland the Prohibition War is the ultimate quest, but here in reality, it's not.
38 posted on 04/23/2004 7:04:34 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
whatever, drugs ruin more lives than all those things you list. Kill directly, maybe not. Ruin, sure.

Youre libertarian ideals amuse me, but I hope you realize how silly you are. I'm advocating non-addictive medications and you come down on me like a ton of bricks. For now, we have what we have.

If we have to add things to oxycontrin to reduce addiction, fine. If that means people can only take the prescribed amount? Fine. Who cares? There's no HARM DONE.
39 posted on 04/23/2004 7:08:27 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
No, they don't. What an absurdly inane statement that was. I guess lives in your fantasyland aren't ruined when people die. LOL!

I haven't come down on you like a ton of bricks for advocating non-addictive medications; quite to the contrary, I joined you in advocating them.

Stop being silly!
40 posted on 04/23/2004 7:13:31 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson