Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drug Makers Hope to Kill the Kick in Pain Relief
NY Times ^ | April 20, 2004 | SANDRA BLAKESLEE

Posted on 04/23/2004 4:22:42 PM PDT by neverdem

Worried that millions of Americans are using prescription opiate painkillers to get high rather than to ease severe chronic pain, drug makers are working on ways to prevent abuse.

Cooperating closely with government officials and pain specialists, the companies are educating doctors, rewriting warning labels and tracking pills as they move from pharmacy to patient.

They are also reformulating pills with added ingredients. One combination blocks euphoria. Another produces a nasty burning sensation.

"The problem of prescription painkiller abuse is much bigger than people realize," said Dr. Clifford Woolf, director of the neural plasticity group and professor of anesthesia research at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston and Harvard Medical School.

"No other drug type in the last 20 years had been so abused in such a short period of time," he said. "It's an epidemic."

According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, more Americans abuse prescription opiates than cocaine and the abusers far outnumber those who misuse tranquilizers, stimulants, hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants or sedatives. After marijuana, pain pills are the drug of choice for America's teenagers and young adults.

How modern painkillers came to be abused is a story of good intentions gone awry. The painkilling action of the opium poppy has been known for thousands of years. Misuse of painkillers also has a long history. A century ago, mothers routinely rubbed tincture of opium on the gums of teething babies to soothe the pain, then took a nip for themselves.

If the medicine was not locked up, other family members often helped themselves. Indeed, the problem got so bad that makers of paregoric, the most popular liquid opiate, added camphor to their formulations to set off a gag reflex.

In recent decades, doctors stopped prescribing opiates because 5 to 10 percent of people who took them became addicted.

Fear of addiction led to the undertreatment of pain and to untold suffering, said Dr. Russ Portenoy, chairman of the department of pain medicine and palliative care at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York.

The 50 million Americans with chronic pain needed help. It arrived five or six years ago when pharmaceutical companies put very large doses of opiates into slow-release formulations. A person who swallows such a pill feels no euphoria but is relieved of pain for up to 24 hours.

The new painkillers were heavily marketed to primary care physicians, Dr. Portenoy said. It was thought that the drugs would not be abused because addicts would not be tempted by sustained release painkillers.

Unfortunately, addicts quickly found that they could grind the pills, swallow or snort the powder and get a high dose of opiates delivered directly into their bloodstreams. They also liked the fact that the drugs were pure and the exact dosage was known.

To counter abuse, drug makers are developing ways to reformulate prescription painkillers. Purdue Pharma in Stamford, Conn., which makes OxyContin, is thinking of adding a second drug, called an opiate antagonist, that neutralizes the effects of the opiate.

The antagonist would be walled off using polymers or some other sequestering technique, said Dr. David Haddox, the company's vice president of health policy.

A patient who swallowed the drug would get full pain relief, as intended. But if someone tampered with the pills, the antagonist would be released.

Then, Dr. Haddox said, one of two things would happen: "If you are a recreational drug user, you feel nothing. The effect is canceled out.

"Why abuse something that has the same effects as a glass of water?"

"But if you are physically dependent," he continued, "you get no euphoria and it might cause withdrawal. You'd get a double whammy."

A second approach is to mix in a chemical irritant like capsaicin, the main ingredient of hot chili peppers, said Dr. Woolf, who has a patent on the idea.

Because the esophagus and stomach do not have many receptors for hot peppers, patients could take the pills as prescribed and find relief, he said. But the lining of the nose and cheeks are loaded with pepper receptors, and anyone who ground up such a pill would get a burning feeling in the chest, face, rectum and extremities, as well as paroxysmal coughing.

Reformulations are a promising avenue, but there are risks.

"We want to make sure that a patient who has need of an opioid does not suffer side effects from a second drug for which he or she has no need," Dr. Haddox said.

"We need to make sure the antagonist doesn't leak," he added.

Approaching the problem from another direction, drug companies and the federal authorities are trying to educate doctors and crack down on doctors who, for whatever reason, dispense painkillers inappropriately.

The Food and Drug Administration, Dr. Portenoy said, is going after doctors who are "duped, dishonest, disabled or dated."

For example, the agency is relabeling prescription painkillers to warn primary physicians of the risks involved. Some doctors, he said, are using the new drugs for broken fingers rather than devastating chronic pain.

New labels are also being introduced to tell doctors how to recognize patients who may be prone to abuse — those with a personal or family history of alcohol or prior drug abuse or mental health problems like bipolar disease, for example — and if the doctor is suspicious, how to monitor those patients with urine tests or other methods.

Some patients go doctor shopping, obtaining prescriptions from a dozen or more family physicians. Others tamper with prescriptions. To address this, drug manufacturers are providing doctors with tamperproof prescription pads that make forgeries difficult. When a prescription is photocopied, the copies say "void."

Doctors are also being taught how to write prescriptions more carefully. Instead of writing 14 pills, which a patient could alter to 140, the doctor writes out the word fourteen. Doctors are also being urged to lock up their prescription pads in the same way they would personal checks.

The Drug Enforcement Administration registers all people who handle opiates, inspects the documentation of opiate distribution, controls imports and exports and oversees the amount of the drugs produced, bought, sold or otherwise transferred. Yet, despite these controls, large amounts of prescription painkillers are being stolen once the drugs move into the hands of pharmacies, doctors and patients. Armed robberies, night break-ins and employee thefts are common.

In the face of so much criminal activity, the drug agency is stepping up efforts to prosecute dishonest pharmacists and doctors who sell opiates for personal profit and to use computer search programs and other means to close down so-called pill mills on the Internet. Electronic prescription monitoring systems are being enlisted. If the same prescription goes to 15 pharmacies, the computer system will sound an alarm.

Still, drug addicts will continue to find ways to foil the efforts to foil them.

People who came to like paregoric learned to boil the liquid, which removed all traces of camphor. The dregs were pure tincture of opium.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Massachusetts; US: New York
KEYWORDS: capsaicin; chronicpain; dea; opiateabuse; opiateantagonist; opiatedependence; opiates; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-249 next last
To: AntiGuv
Well, as long as I am entertaining..

I'm sure Andrea Mankoski is a fine person, she seems nice on her site. I had a girlfriend that didn't have endometriosis like Andrea, but she did have severe fibromyalgia which I've seen a few sites quoting Andrea's scale.

I am no stranger to pain. Nor to drug problems with people I've cared for.

I'm kinda disturbed that you think this is all a joke. To me it's quite serious.
181 posted on 04/24/2004 1:09:57 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
You don't even know what I'm advocating.

All I've said is I want effective medication without any high involved. Why is this some heresy to the pro drug people?
182 posted on 04/24/2004 1:11:11 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
"This helped calm them psycholically and countered the fear and anxiety..which was an important part of the relief and healing process."

I think this is an important point you made. This "high" that is felt by narcotic painkillers I believe (and have read) assists the body in the healing process by alleviating anxiety, depression, and other negative emotions that often goes with the pain which facilitates physical healing.

I think that narcotics are a little too controlled, and could actually be dispensed to treat depression as well as pain as long as they are not abused. They help elevate someone's mood, and can make them more responsive to other forms of treatment, and in moderation are less dangerous than alchohol. There is also a growing body of evidence that SSRI's actually induce mental illness in the long term, and are actually quite dangerous.

If someone could take an opiate tablet once in awhile to deal with the negative emotions they are faced with I think they would be less apt to end up in a drunken stupor at the local bar, and a deadly collision on the highway at the end of the night.



183 posted on 04/24/2004 1:11:38 AM PDT by gawatchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Everyone's opinion is clouded by ego and blinkers. So what? That's saying nothing. While we're at it, here's another good quote:

Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.

That's why I prefer ridiculing fools. I learned a long time ago when to bother debating someone and when to merely amuse myself at their expense.. =)

184 posted on 04/24/2004 1:12:03 AM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: gawatchman
"I think that narcotics are a little too controlled, and could actually be dispensed to treat depression as well as pain as long as they are not abused"

They are terrible for depression since they have a tolerance and cause a crash when you can't increase dosage.
185 posted on 04/24/2004 1:13:04 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
You don't even know what I'm advocating.

Sure I do. You just told me. Or was that another falsehood?

You also advocated murdering the terminally ill in an earlier comment.

186 posted on 04/24/2004 1:14:49 AM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Switching topics, if I may.

Do you think the Second Amendment applies to all levels of government?

IOW, are State or municipal governments allowed to ban gun ownership according to your view of the Second Amendment?

187 posted on 04/24/2004 1:15:05 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
I'm so sorry to hear of your pain and problems!

If you notice,it's mostly guys,who are pro-dopers.I'd really like them to have 9 hours of back labour and give birth.LOL

BTW,I know no mother,back labour or the regular kind,who wasn't a drug addict,who thought that it was her "RIGHT",to get high during or after labour and giving birth.

The pro-dopers think that a hangnail is reason enough to get stoned.

I read the article,which started this thread,and think it's a great idea,that drug manufacturers are doing whatever It takes to keep the drug abusers away from getting a "high" from meds,meant for those who REALLY need.

188 posted on 04/24/2004 1:15:21 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
175 was sarcasm, thought I made that clear.

The other one? Well, people shouldn't suffer and if they're in the last few days, I'm not sure the benefit of making them suffer. No amount of drugs can help at that point.
189 posted on 04/24/2004 1:16:20 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
ROTFLOL

So says you.

190 posted on 04/24/2004 1:16:34 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
What does the 2nd have to do with drugs?

Drugs aren't arms that I can tell.
191 posted on 04/24/2004 1:17:31 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
the pro dopers are loud. Our types tend to not get on these threads.

They get an inflated ego from it.
192 posted on 04/24/2004 1:18:30 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I am quite certain that more people agree with me that the terminally ill should not be murdered in order to prevent them from getting high. ;)
193 posted on 04/24/2004 1:20:22 AM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Not that my personal views are determined by majority vote, in any case. I'm sorry if yours are.
194 posted on 04/24/2004 1:21:07 AM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
You haven't a clue;not a single one.

I've read this thread.I've read the article.I know exactly what you've posted on this thread and I've had the chance to see you on other threads.So here are a few well chosen words from the inimitable William S.Gilbert..."Oh folly, folly, folly................" :-)

195 posted on 04/24/2004 1:21:17 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Their use should be controlled which would alleviate the tolerance issue, and the narcotic painkillers that I used to take as directed for my back pain such as hydrocodone never caused a "crash".


196 posted on 04/24/2004 1:21:52 AM PDT by gawatchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Now you're going to go on that.. Actually, I'm not sure how to deal with it, my knee-jerk reaction is to end their suffering faster without being in a drug haze.

Or let them just go. On that point, the last few days of a painful illness, it is a tough call.
197 posted on 04/24/2004 1:22:09 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: gawatchman
I have personally known a vicodin addict that did crash without it.

It's potentially disasterous.
198 posted on 04/24/2004 1:23:16 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
My views are based on knowledge...factual,historical knowledge,experience,and morality;NOT on anyone else's views/opinions/propaganda/the "majority".
199 posted on 04/24/2004 1:23:59 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
That wasn't what I was referring to at all and you know it..or should.
200 posted on 04/24/2004 1:25:47 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson