Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drug Makers Hope to Kill the Kick in Pain Relief
NY Times ^ | April 20, 2004 | SANDRA BLAKESLEE

Posted on 04/23/2004 4:22:42 PM PDT by neverdem

Worried that millions of Americans are using prescription opiate painkillers to get high rather than to ease severe chronic pain, drug makers are working on ways to prevent abuse.

Cooperating closely with government officials and pain specialists, the companies are educating doctors, rewriting warning labels and tracking pills as they move from pharmacy to patient.

They are also reformulating pills with added ingredients. One combination blocks euphoria. Another produces a nasty burning sensation.

"The problem of prescription painkiller abuse is much bigger than people realize," said Dr. Clifford Woolf, director of the neural plasticity group and professor of anesthesia research at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston and Harvard Medical School.

"No other drug type in the last 20 years had been so abused in such a short period of time," he said. "It's an epidemic."

According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, more Americans abuse prescription opiates than cocaine and the abusers far outnumber those who misuse tranquilizers, stimulants, hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants or sedatives. After marijuana, pain pills are the drug of choice for America's teenagers and young adults.

How modern painkillers came to be abused is a story of good intentions gone awry. The painkilling action of the opium poppy has been known for thousands of years. Misuse of painkillers also has a long history. A century ago, mothers routinely rubbed tincture of opium on the gums of teething babies to soothe the pain, then took a nip for themselves.

If the medicine was not locked up, other family members often helped themselves. Indeed, the problem got so bad that makers of paregoric, the most popular liquid opiate, added camphor to their formulations to set off a gag reflex.

In recent decades, doctors stopped prescribing opiates because 5 to 10 percent of people who took them became addicted.

Fear of addiction led to the undertreatment of pain and to untold suffering, said Dr. Russ Portenoy, chairman of the department of pain medicine and palliative care at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York.

The 50 million Americans with chronic pain needed help. It arrived five or six years ago when pharmaceutical companies put very large doses of opiates into slow-release formulations. A person who swallows such a pill feels no euphoria but is relieved of pain for up to 24 hours.

The new painkillers were heavily marketed to primary care physicians, Dr. Portenoy said. It was thought that the drugs would not be abused because addicts would not be tempted by sustained release painkillers.

Unfortunately, addicts quickly found that they could grind the pills, swallow or snort the powder and get a high dose of opiates delivered directly into their bloodstreams. They also liked the fact that the drugs were pure and the exact dosage was known.

To counter abuse, drug makers are developing ways to reformulate prescription painkillers. Purdue Pharma in Stamford, Conn., which makes OxyContin, is thinking of adding a second drug, called an opiate antagonist, that neutralizes the effects of the opiate.

The antagonist would be walled off using polymers or some other sequestering technique, said Dr. David Haddox, the company's vice president of health policy.

A patient who swallowed the drug would get full pain relief, as intended. But if someone tampered with the pills, the antagonist would be released.

Then, Dr. Haddox said, one of two things would happen: "If you are a recreational drug user, you feel nothing. The effect is canceled out.

"Why abuse something that has the same effects as a glass of water?"

"But if you are physically dependent," he continued, "you get no euphoria and it might cause withdrawal. You'd get a double whammy."

A second approach is to mix in a chemical irritant like capsaicin, the main ingredient of hot chili peppers, said Dr. Woolf, who has a patent on the idea.

Because the esophagus and stomach do not have many receptors for hot peppers, patients could take the pills as prescribed and find relief, he said. But the lining of the nose and cheeks are loaded with pepper receptors, and anyone who ground up such a pill would get a burning feeling in the chest, face, rectum and extremities, as well as paroxysmal coughing.

Reformulations are a promising avenue, but there are risks.

"We want to make sure that a patient who has need of an opioid does not suffer side effects from a second drug for which he or she has no need," Dr. Haddox said.

"We need to make sure the antagonist doesn't leak," he added.

Approaching the problem from another direction, drug companies and the federal authorities are trying to educate doctors and crack down on doctors who, for whatever reason, dispense painkillers inappropriately.

The Food and Drug Administration, Dr. Portenoy said, is going after doctors who are "duped, dishonest, disabled or dated."

For example, the agency is relabeling prescription painkillers to warn primary physicians of the risks involved. Some doctors, he said, are using the new drugs for broken fingers rather than devastating chronic pain.

New labels are also being introduced to tell doctors how to recognize patients who may be prone to abuse — those with a personal or family history of alcohol or prior drug abuse or mental health problems like bipolar disease, for example — and if the doctor is suspicious, how to monitor those patients with urine tests or other methods.

Some patients go doctor shopping, obtaining prescriptions from a dozen or more family physicians. Others tamper with prescriptions. To address this, drug manufacturers are providing doctors with tamperproof prescription pads that make forgeries difficult. When a prescription is photocopied, the copies say "void."

Doctors are also being taught how to write prescriptions more carefully. Instead of writing 14 pills, which a patient could alter to 140, the doctor writes out the word fourteen. Doctors are also being urged to lock up their prescription pads in the same way they would personal checks.

The Drug Enforcement Administration registers all people who handle opiates, inspects the documentation of opiate distribution, controls imports and exports and oversees the amount of the drugs produced, bought, sold or otherwise transferred. Yet, despite these controls, large amounts of prescription painkillers are being stolen once the drugs move into the hands of pharmacies, doctors and patients. Armed robberies, night break-ins and employee thefts are common.

In the face of so much criminal activity, the drug agency is stepping up efforts to prosecute dishonest pharmacists and doctors who sell opiates for personal profit and to use computer search programs and other means to close down so-called pill mills on the Internet. Electronic prescription monitoring systems are being enlisted. If the same prescription goes to 15 pharmacies, the computer system will sound an alarm.

Still, drug addicts will continue to find ways to foil the efforts to foil them.

People who came to like paregoric learned to boil the liquid, which removed all traces of camphor. The dregs were pure tincture of opium.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Massachusetts; US: New York
KEYWORDS: capsaicin; chronicpain; dea; opiateabuse; opiateantagonist; opiatedependence; opiates; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-249 next last
To: Monty22
Monty22 wrote: Simple really. SSRI's at the time of trauma to start, benzos up front and tapered off quickly after 3 weeks.

Why's that so hard to understand? It's common practice.

Here's what the Merck Manual says--

The prevalence of acute stress disorder is unknown but is presumably proportionate to the severity of the trauma and the extent of exposure to the trauma.

Many persons recover once they are removed from the traumatic situation and given appropriate support in the form of understanding, empathy for their distress, and an opportunity to describe what happened and their reaction to it. Many benefit from describing their experience several times. Drugs to assist sleep may help, but other drugs are probably not indicated because they may interfere with the natural healing process.

http://www.merck.com/mrkshared/mmanual/section15/chapter187/187f.jsp

Do you still stand by your recommendation?

121 posted on 04/23/2004 11:12:25 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
A mild benzo situation may work. Sure.

Trauma is often used for such.
122 posted on 04/23/2004 11:15:13 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Drugs are not protected by an amendments. Guns are. Sorry, guns != drugs.

And liberals are usually more pro drug and more anti gun too.
123 posted on 04/23/2004 11:16:18 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
Your underlined data has nothing to do with SSRI's or benzos in particular. sorry.

Canadian reseachers LOL

And, SSRI's? Benzos? Your pastes show nothing of the breakdowns.
124 posted on 04/23/2004 11:18:31 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: eno_
"Monty, unless you are teatotal, you're a hypocrit. "

Define 'teatotal' please.
125 posted on 04/23/2004 11:20:15 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
...liberals are usually more pro drug...

A certain subset of liberals, certainly, however it's socialists who gave us the drug war. Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson enacted almost all of the relevant provisions. Even the most recent RAVE Act expansion was the brainchild of Joe Biden.

126 posted on 04/23/2004 11:25:43 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
A mild benzo situation may work. Sure.

OK, but what about SSRI's? You wrote:

Simple really. SSRI's at the time of trauma to start, benzos up front and tapered off quickly after 3 weeks.

Why's that so hard to understand? It's common practice.

110 posted on 04/24/2004 12:03:56 AM CDT by Monty22

Are you standing by this recommendation for SSRI's?

127 posted on 04/23/2004 11:28:34 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Not that it surprises me that you support the policies of FDR and LBJ. Most so-called conservatives lost their way a long time ago.
128 posted on 04/23/2004 11:29:09 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
I'm as pro gun as anyone, did LBJ and FDR support that somehow?
129 posted on 04/23/2004 11:31:09 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
No. In fact, FDR and LBJ respectively passed the National Firearms Act of 1938 and the National Gun Control Act of 1968 which were the major pieces of anti-gun legislation before WJC.

Like Ken said, the nexus between the prohibition war and the creeping gun grab is historically quite clear. In fact, the main rationale for the Brady Act & AWB as well was the alleged use of 'assault weapons' by inner city drug gangs.

The two have always gone hand in hand.
130 posted on 04/23/2004 11:36:28 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Oh, wait - I meant like eno said. He's the one that brought up the anti-drug/anti-gun authoritarian nexus.
131 posted on 04/23/2004 11:37:53 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Tin foil time.
132 posted on 04/23/2004 11:44:40 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
The point is that prescriptin drugs are potentially dangerous and should be used properly.

You advocated SSRI's for acute emotional trauma, which is at odds with the Merck Manual.

Do you really prescribe SSRI's for acute traumatic stress?

133 posted on 04/23/2004 11:45:33 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
I never said use them for acute trauma..

Are you insane?

Why would anyone expect 3-4 week SSRI reactions to be used for instant trauma? My point was the emotional issues with pain may be treated with SSRI's.

Not right away of course. What, are you a baby? You need a high to get past acute trauma? C'mon, no doctor's going to say (I hope) 'stick this in your arm and you'll feel better'.

What are you advocating? pills? drugs? crack?

My entire point on this damned thread is to say we can and are working on stuff that will not be abused. And I get all this flak.
134 posted on 04/23/2004 11:49:39 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Ooohh.. I bet your brain really hurts after coming up with that gem.
135 posted on 04/23/2004 11:49:47 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Really hurts, wiseass.
136 posted on 04/23/2004 11:50:33 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
I never said use them for acute trauma..

Why would anyone expect 3-4 week SSRI reactions to be used for instant trauma? My point was the emotional issues with pain may be treated with SSRI's.

Not right away of course.

Why did you say this in post #110?--

SSRI's at the time of trauma to start

137 posted on 04/24/2004 12:02:24 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
To start, as in..

Why do I bother.

As something that'll possibly treat severe emotional issues long term?

Grow up.. You know what I meant, stop being a baby.
138 posted on 04/24/2004 12:03:37 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
You are what we in the medical profession call an idiot>.

Opioid therapy is just that...a therapy.

Those that are granted opioid therapy do not get "high". They become what is called "adjusted". When a patient cannot "bear" existance without help of a analgesic, it is within the parameters of the prescribing physician to prescribe just that...a medicine that relieves the pain of a patient that suffers on a monkoski scale of 8-10.

Who are YOU dear sir to question our ability to relieve the pain of those who suffer such maladies?

You should be ashamed.

What are you doing on FreeRupublic with this drivel?

139 posted on 04/24/2004 12:06:13 AM PDT by JDoutrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: JDoutrider
You're a doctor, well I'll bow down to you then. Afterall, anyone on FR who claims to know something oughta know.
140 posted on 04/24/2004 12:10:28 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson