Posted on 04/22/2004 6:27:10 AM PDT by The Bandit
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:14:38 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
The military records that Sen. John Kerry posted on his Web site yesterday raise new questions about the actions he took to earn several prestigious war medals and whether he deserved them.
The Navy awarded Mr. Kerry three Purple Hearts, a Silver Star and a Bronze Star in just four months of commanding a gunboat along rivers in Vietnam. It's an extraordinary record, say many veterans, and one that raises questions on its face.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
The official "Three Owies And You're Out" policy?
Remember Frank Burns in the MASH TV series? Frank Burns requested a Purple Heart twice:
In one episode, Frank requested a Purple Heart for "shell fragment injury in a combat zone".......He had gotten an eggshell fragment in the eye while making an omelette.
In another episode, Frank requested a Purple Heart for a "back injury in a war zone" after a night of strenuous adultery with Hotlips.
Try Googling "Frank Burns, Purple Heart". The first hit you get deals with............Kerry and his Purple Hearts. :-)
(Google Search: Frank Burns, Purple Heart)
What is truly dishonorable, and something that not even the fictional Frank Burns tried to do, is use those Purple Hearts to sea lawyer himself out of his combat tour after only 4 months while honorable men stayed behind to do their duty in spite of the minor bruises and scratches they received on every combat patrol they ever went on.
There is more to this than Kerry is willing to provide. I wish this information would have been released closer to the convention. I would hate for the Dems to change their mind at this point.
Unless you blast and sink every sampam that you encounter on the river and count every body that floats back up as an "enemy kill".
One of the problems with Kerry, as expressed by his Vietnam commanders, was that Kerry was "killing so many non-combatant civilians and going after other non-military targets." :
One way for the brass to cover up such an embarrassing problem is to label Kerry's non-combatant kills as "enemy kills".
Kerry must have requested an amendment to his DD214. The amendment (DD215), among other things deletes the Vietnam Service Medal and replaces it with the Vietnam Service Medal with 4 bronze stars. The date of this amendment is March 12, 2001!!! Another example: His Bronze Star citation was originally signed by Zumwalt when he was Commander of the US Forces in Vietnam. For whatever reason, at least 12 years after the incident, John Lehman, SecNav 5 Feb 1981 - 10 Apr 1987, signs the same citation. Either Kerry never received his medal at the time or he maybe he threw it away.
What I glean from these two examples is that Kerry is caught in a time warp. He is totally obsessed with Vietnam and his decorations. I can't imagine anyone going back and amending their record that way. What could possibly be the purpose? This is sick. I would also add his recreating and filming his "battles" while being assigned to Vietnam and the Vietnam shrine he keeps in his home. It is all a case of image building, but what I find bizarre is the fact that he believes that he really is a "highly decorated war hero."
Maybe not, but, with a good bit of the American electorate getting their political education from Saturday Night Live and David Letterman, it is not something that should be taken lightly.
Many voters don't have the attention span to understand "Purple Heart requirements as set forth by......"
However, they immediately know what you are taliking about when you mention a "Frank Burns Purple Heart"
There was a bit on yesterday's Daily Show that started with an actual quote about Kerry being treated with a bit of antibiotic ointment, followed up with a joke quote along the lines of "...patient demanded a Snoopy Band-Aid".
So, how does a guy doing average work collect that handful of medals? Kerry was bright and well connected; was he gaming the system? When Kerry found himself on river duty instead of destroyers did he have a plan to use the three purple heart rule? Why did he go back years later and have paperwork done to clean up his record? Why is he stonewalling on releasing the medical records after he said he would?. How did he get that first purple heart for his owie and who authorized it?
My position has been that Kerry served honorably but dishonored himself and his fellow vets by his VVAW activity. But the more I learn about his service record, the more things don't seem to add up.
If it walks like a FAKE, balks like a FAKE, and for sure talks like a FAKE, theres a good chance we're dealing with a charlatan, con artist, counterfeiter, deceiver, defrauder, forger impostor and phoney.
After nondescript service on the USS Gridley, Kerry saw PCF service as a chance to have command and be fairly safe. It also fit the JFK image of PT 109. Unfortunately, the PCF mission was changed from coastal patrol to river duty ala PBRs. After his first encounter with enmemy fire in Dec 68, he figured out the only way he was going to be able to leave honorably (and maybe alive) was to use some obscure regulation like 3 PHs. He was able to use his considerable abillities as a self-promoter to garner awards and leave as soon as possible. It was only a matter of days after his 3rd Purple Heart that he initiated a request to leave, making it obvious that was his objective all along.
I believe that Kerry probably lost his nerve as well. He wanted out of a combat zone as quickly as possible. He chose to leave his shipmates behind and not complete his assigned tour despite no physical impediments to the contrary. From that time onwards, Kerry has been rationalizing his actions. His antiwar activities were part of this rationalization and it propelled him into the national spotlight. Now he had a justification for bugging out beyond saving his own skin. Today the guy who urged his fellow vets to throw away their medals is portraying himself as a war hero who should be celebrated for his service. In fact, he is so fixated on decorations and medals that he is still updating his service record to ensure that he gets credit for all of his decorations. In other words, he wants it both ways.
As a Vietnam veteran, I don't think the country and the political leadership at the time supported the troops as they should have. Kerry did serve his country honorably by his military service, but he threw it all away by joining the VVAW and demeaning the service of his comrades. Kerry needs to be held accountable for his actions. He is unfit to be CIC.
Thanks for giving your input. It makes a lot of sense. I think very highly of your opinion since you were a very brave person who survived that war and its aftermath, both there and in the USA.
Yes they do if you consider that Kerry had been trying to get out of having to go to Vietnam when he asked his draft board to let him go to Paris for a one year study.
Think about it
Does anyone have a link to the medal paperwork that Kerry put online???
I can't find my bookmark
Kerry glows with pride while wearing one of the Purple Hearts he desperately sought.
Democratic presidential nominee in waiting Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) frequently speaks of courage, brotherhood and responsibility when he mentions his brief service in Vietnam. He took Super-8 home movies there in which he staged heroics in full-battle dress, so that later he might use them for campaign ads. Kerry has made so much of his Vietnam medals which he once pretended to throw away that critics have begun to wonder why he has been so cagey about the dubious circumstances surrounding the Purple Hearts that got him out of Vietnam after only four months of combat service. Under the rules, a serviceman had to be awarded three Purple Hearts to apply to go home. Not one or two, but three. And, say critics, there's the rub.
Kerry, who piloted Patrol Crafts Fast (PCFs) as a young Lt.(jg) in the Vietnam War, has always made much of those Purple Hearts. An award often pinned on the pillow of a combat warrior so badly wounded that he cannot sit up to receive it, the Purple Heart recognizes the sacrifices of combat when a soldier or officer has sustained a wound "from an outside force or agent" and received treatment from a medical officer. The records for such treatment "must have been made a matter of official record," according to the military definition of the award.
According to Kerry's own description in Douglas Brinkley's Tour of Duty, the Dec. 2, 1968, mission behind what he has claimed to be his first Purple Heart was "a half-assed action that hardly qualified as combat." Indeed. Kerry was stationed with Coastal Division 14 at Cam Ranh Bay. At that time he piloted a small foam-filled boat, known as a Boston Whaler, with two enlisted men in the darkness of early morning. The intent, apparently, was to patrol an area that was known for contraband trafficking, but it was an undocumented mission. Upon approaching the objective point, the crew noticed a sampan crossing the river. As it pulled to shore, Kerry and his little team opened fire, destroying the boat and whatever its cargo might have been.
In the confusion, Kerry claims to have received a "stinging piece of heat" in the arm, the result of a tiny piece of shrapnel. He was not incapacitated and continued with regular swiftboat-patrol duty. William Shachte, who oversaw this ad hoc mission, was quoted by the Boston Globe as saying Kerry's injury, from whatever source, "was not a serious wound at all."
But Kerry met with his immediate superior officer, Lt.Cmdr. Grant Hibbard, the next morning and requested a Purple Heart for his wound. Hibbard recalls that Kerry had a "minor scratch" on his arm and was holding in his hand what appeared to be a fragment of a U.S. M-79 grenade, the shrapnel that had caused the wound. "They didn't receive enemy fire," Hibbard tells Insight. Since this was an essential requirement for the award, the commander rejected Kerry's request. Hibbard does not remember that Kerry received medical attention of any kind and confirms that no one else on the mission suffered any injuries.
Shortly thereafter, Kerry was transferred to Coastal Division 11 at An Thoi. Apparently, Kerry petitioned to have his Purple Heart request reconsidered. Hibbard remembers getting correspondence from Kerry's new division, asking for his approval. In the hurried process of moving to a new command himself, Hibbard thinks he might have signed off on the award. If so, "it was to my chagrin," Hibbard remembers. Kerry's second commander, Lt.Cmdr. G.M. Elliott, says he has no recollection of such an event ever occurring.
There are no written records of Kerry's magical first Purple Heart on file at the Naval Historical Center in Washington, the nation's primary repository for such documentation. A Purple Heart normally is not requested but is awarded de facto for a wound inflicted by the enemy - a wound serious enough to require medical attention. The Naval Historical Center keeps all documents connected to such awards to U.S. Navy and Marine personnel. These typewritten "casualty cards" list the date, location and prognosis of the wound for which the Purple Heart is given, and they are produced by the medical facility that provides treatment for the combat wound at the hands of the enemy. There are two such cards for Kerry - for his slight wounds on Feb. 20 and March 13, 1969, but none for his December 1968 claim.
After receiving a Purple Heart for the March 13 scratch and bruise, Kerry sought an early pass out of combat duty, invoking the informal Navy "instruction" known as 1300.39. According to the Boston Globe, 1300.39 meant an officer could request a reassignment from his superior officer after receiving three Purple Hearts. The instruction states that, rather than being automatic, the reassignment would "be determined after consideration of his physical classification for duty and on an individual basis." Of the 138 servicemen and officers in Kerry's unit who received Purple Hearts during the time he was there, records indicate only two received more than two. These were Lt.(jg) Jim Galvin and a boatswain's mate named Stevens. When Insight reached Galvin he said all three of his Purple Hearts were the result of shrapnel or glass shards. Such minor injuries were common on PCF boats with their glass windows and thin metal hulls, and, like Kerry's, Galvin's injuries were not serious enough to take him out of combat for more than a few days.
Unlike Kerry, Galvin elected to stay with his men. Indeed, though a professional Navy officer, he never had heard of instruction 1300.39. It was not until early April of 1969, when Galvin noticed that Kerry was preparing to leave the officers' barracks at An Thoi that he learned about "three Purple Hearts and you're out." According to Galvin, it was Kerry who told him, "There's a rule that gets you out of here and I'm getting out. You ought to do the same." Galvin remembers, "He seemed to take care of everything pretty quickly," because that was the last time Galvin saw Kerry in Vietnam.
The three-times wounded Galvin stayed with his men, transferred to Cam Ranh Bay to get them a respite from the dicey Mekong Delta, and eventually left the swiftboats for destroyer school.
Insight: contacted many men who served in Coastal Division at the same time Kerry did to ask if any of them had heard of anyone leaving the combat zone by invoking three minor wounds. Of the 12 who replied, none had heard of anyone doing so but John Kerry."
Less than a month after having claimed three wounds for which he lost no more than a total of two days of duty, Kerry reported as an aide to a navy yard admiral in Brooklyn, New York, leaving his crew in Vietnam. Two years later, preparing for a congressional race in a left-wing Massachusetts district - where the seat eventually was won by the even more radical Rev. Robert Drinan - Kerry was working with Maoists and other radicals in Vietnam Veterans Against the War, saying of those he left behind who were being killed and wounded for real that they were committing crimes "on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels."
Indeed, Kerry said, he knew men who in Vietnam "had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks and generally ravaged the countryside." Addressing the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on April 22, 1971, about these and other alleged war crimes, he called on the United States to pay "extensive reparations."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.