Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strayhorn: Shut down the topless bars (Texas)
AUSTIN AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF ^ | Thursday, April 22, 2004 | By Ken Herman and Michelle M. Martinez

Posted on 04/22/2004 5:59:52 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952

Another day, another squabble as Perry-Strayhorn fight continues.

By Ken Herman and Michelle M. Martinez

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Thursday, April 22, 2004

Comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn, dabbling in subject matter a tad sexier than the usual daily number crunching, said Wednesday that the state should shut down all topless bars by prohibiting them from selling alcoholic drinks.

The proposal is the latest in what have become daily Strayhorn attacks on Gov. Rick Perry's proposed school finance package. The Perry plan, aimed at drumming up more money for public schools while reducing property taxes, includes a proposed $5 admission surcharge at adult entertainment venues.

What kind of state, Strayhorn said, would depend on that kind of money to pay for schools? What kind of governor, Strayhorn asked, would propose such a thing?

"I don't want my five granddaughters growing up in a state where the governor says partnering with sexually oriented nightclubs is an acceptable way to finance their education," she said.

Strayhorn is considering challenging Perry when he seeks re-election in 2006. Both are Republicans.

Perry defended the proposed fee, noting it aligns with his goal of increasing taxes on "unhealthy" behavior. He also wants a dollar-per-pack hike in cigarette taxes.

"There are a lot of activities that are legal in the state of Texas that some individuals find to be distasteful and not appropriate," he said.

Perry noted that "the question has come up: Why don't you raise the liquor tax?

"The fact of the matter is, drinking a glass of wine is not necessarily an unhealthy activity," he said.

Perry also wants to legalize slot-machine-like devices at the state's pari-mutuel tracks. He declined to categorize gambling as an unhealthy activity.

"The state has said clearly that it is going to accept gambling as a form of entertainment to be legal in the state of Texas," he said, pointing to popular votes that legalized the state lottery and pari-mutuel gambling at horse and dog tracks.

Strayhorn was adamant in her call for legislation barring alcohol at "sexually oriented nightclubs."

"If these clubs can stay in business selling lemonade and iced tea, at least I will feel better about the safety of the dancers," she said. "Alcohol can make the meek violent, the quiet loud and the passive aggressive. People can and do get hurt in these clubs."

Strayhorn, branding Perry's proposal as a "sleaze tax," said the true goal would be to put the clubs out of business.

Perry and Strayhorn have been going at it all week, beginning Monday, when, in numbers vehemently challenged by Perry, she said his plan would produce a $10 billion deficit after five years, provide little meaningful property tax relief and do little to help schools.

Perry on Wednesday criticized Strayhorn's analysis as a "shoddy, fly-by-night" effort based on "eye-popping miscalculations."

"It is an astonishing fact that the top number cruncher in this state could be so wrong on the numbers and the facts about my plan," he said.

Said Strayhorn, "How dare this governor question the integrity of this office?"

But Perry was not alone in questioning Strayhorn's operation.

Rep. Mike Krusee, R-Round Rock and a Perry ally, admonished her staff during a meeting of the House Select Committee on Public School Finance and questioned the comptroller's estimates of how much new money each school district would receive under Perry's plan.

Krusee put Perry's plan on the table Wednesday as a starting point for the committee, which can use any part of Perry's plan -- or none of it -- as it crafts the House's school finance bill.

Strayhorn's numbers, which showed many districts would get no additional money under Perry's plan, differed substantially from a similar report issued by Perry's office.

Krusee said the report inaccurately puts the Lexington school district in his district.

"You said you had a real high degree of confidence in your numbers. You got the school districts wrong," Krusee told James LeBas, the comptroller's chief revenue estimator. "You still have a high degree of confidence in your numbers?"

LeBas stood by his numbers and defended his boss: "I'm sure the comptroller had every intention, and still does, on being helpful to the Legislature."

Strayhorn's office said it plans to release new estimates, and House Appropriations Chairman Talmadge Heflin, R-Houston, said work will be needed to reconcile any differences between the two sets of numbers.

"We don't know right now whether it's apples and oranges, pears and oranges, kumquats and bananas or whatever," Heflin said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Political Humor/Cartoons; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: adultentertainment; backstabber; carole; exmayor; keeton; mclellan; oneharpygrandmother; rylander; schoolfinance; selfocrat; strayhorn; tax; youradhere
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-166 last
To: Blue Collar Christian
I'd keep clubs in the shadows by not letting them advertise. No neon or sexual suggestive signs and only zone certain areas for their use.
161 posted on 04/25/2004 7:40:36 AM PDT by Vision (Always Faithful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Vision
"...and only zone certain areas for their use."

I knew you'd go there.
162 posted on 04/26/2004 11:22:42 PM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (So "F'n" means "flip-flopping"? ><BCC>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Blue Collar Christian
Don't you think you have to?

Here in Baltimore, there is one area of the city with a ton of strip clubs. Then there is this one club, on a main drag in the city near the Stadium. IMO, that one club shouldn't be so close to areas where families traffic.
163 posted on 04/27/2004 6:21:47 AM PDT by Vision (Always Faithful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Vision
Don't get me wrong, I don't want strip clubs anywhere. In 1971, when I was a kid, our family was on vacation, cross country with a camper trailer. When we were going up the coast from D.C. we had to pass through your lovely city and could not use the tunnel. We had to drive though that filthy section to use a bridge, and it was disgusting. We kids were age 6 through 15 and being from a very small town in the Mojave Desert, were not ready for what we saw.

No matter where these seedy joints are located, lots of families are stuck seeing them.

I work in an industrial zoned part of Van Nuys, CA, where there are two of these such units on our block, and only 1 block away form housing. I don't want these businesses anywhere near me or anybody's house, but could not see myself signing a petition from the neighborhood attempting to ban strip joints from the area. Noisey motorcycle shops could be the next business being banned from their neighborhood, and that would be ME!

I'm funny that way.
164 posted on 04/27/2004 8:43:23 AM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (So "F'n" means "flip-flopping"? ><BCC>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Blue Collar Christian
All I'm asking for is for common sense decency to return to the country.
165 posted on 04/27/2004 9:04:20 AM PDT by Vision (Always Faithful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Vision
Is this where we start? Alot more "families" see TV constantly, and more of that than anything else that is perfectly disgusting, and it's right in our livingrooms.

I see your point, and want decency in America as much as anyone else, I just don't see safety in censorship, or or any other excuse for making MORE laws.
166 posted on 04/27/2004 10:50:32 PM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (So "F'n" means "flip-flopping"? ><BCC>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-166 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson