To: Tom Pain
So...Dick Clarke drew a McVeigh/Nichols connection to Al Qaeda. ...... Well?!? How come we don't hear THIS from the partisan "mainstream" media?
FWIW, I've seen a number of "mainstream" references to Clarke's comments on the possible connection.
All of them presented Clarke's position accurately: that he found the evidence suggestive, and remained fascinated by the possibility that there was connection because he was never able to absolutely eliminate the possibility of such a connection.
68 posted on
04/21/2004 6:49:35 PM PDT by
M. Dodge Thomas
(More of the same, only with more zeros on the end.)
To: M. Dodge Thomas
because he was never able to absolutely eliminate the possibility of such a connection.That's the precise reasoning for going after Saddam; we could not rule out a connection with al-Qaeda.
So, he would be supportive of our presidents' inquiry's of a connection between Saddam and 9-11, would he not ? /sarc/
78 posted on
04/22/2004 8:22:52 AM PDT by
happygrl
(this war is for all the marbles...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson