Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tom Pain
So...Dick Clarke drew a McVeigh/Nichols connection to Al Qaeda. ...... Well?!? How come we don't hear THIS from the partisan "mainstream" media?

FWIW, I've seen a number of "mainstream" references to Clarke's comments on the possible connection.

All of them presented Clarke's position accurately: that he found the evidence suggestive, and remained fascinated by the possibility that there was connection because he was never able to absolutely eliminate the possibility of such a connection.
68 posted on 04/21/2004 6:49:35 PM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas (More of the same, only with more zeros on the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: M. Dodge Thomas
because he was never able to absolutely eliminate the possibility of such a connection.

That's the precise reasoning for going after Saddam; we could not rule out a connection with al-Qaeda.

So, he would be supportive of our presidents' inquiry's of a connection between Saddam and 9-11, would he not ? /sarc/

78 posted on 04/22/2004 8:22:52 AM PDT by happygrl (this war is for all the marbles...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson