George Bush. The Worst President in U.S. History.

Recieved via email from a friend | Recently | Unknown

[Kirkwood]

Clinton was basically the biggest do-nothing president. It was just a joke for him. Carter was indeed the worst president.

[JohnD9207]

Look my friend if you are gonna post something here, you gotta post the truth. Conservatives are NEVER gonna believe that Ted Kennedy proposed a toast every 50-75 minutes. If the truth be known, at best it was every 12-21 minutes allowing him waddle time to slosh his way to the sandbox for a pit stop. Get your facts straight.

[spodefly]

BTTT

[Publius6961]

This has probably been posted before, but I figured it was worth a second reading.

I missed it if it was posted before, so I am happy to see it.
Nice summary.

The morons will not understand the words though. They will say... "but..." and off they go. There's no communication possible with a closed and limited mind. The words are simple, the concepts clear and it makes total sense to me.

[spodefly]

"sucient"

Thanks for the new word. wrote it in my dictionary where they should have had it.

With the right exposure, "sucient" could become FR's next "word"^*, as in "that was a most sucient post".

* See: "series"; "hugh"

[luckymom]

Mr. Bush is the worst president ever: for Americas ENEMIES.

I want a bumpersticker saying that!!!

[al baby]

Thanks for the new word. wrote it in my dictionary where they should have had it.

See theres more to al baby than his left nut after surfing quote

[backtothestreets]

The debate on best and worst presidents will never be resolved. On the otherhand, the present government collectively, which includes all three branches is the worst our nation has ever endured.

Here's a clue on performance citing security:

In 1999 a terrorist was arrested entering our country from Canada. He had explosives and maps indicating his target was the Los Angeles Air Terminal, NOT AN AIRCRAFT. That's important knowledge this President and Congress intentionally overlooked when addressing post 9-11 airport security.

Post 9-11 security was increased somewhat inside terminals, but would offer no defense to a similar planned attack of 1999. The President knows this. The Congress knows this.

Collectively they offered a "feel safe" solution inside the terminals, rather then a full terminal parameter protection that could prevent attacks like the one planned in 1999. In essence, our government choose to protect aircraft, and airline companies, not people.

[Steven W.]

I've never seen it but like it :)

[Luis Gonzalez]

"But then again, it would be hard to give someone a disease when you are not having sex together."

They were sleeping with the same women.

[GATOR NAVY]

I never thought I'd live to see the day when it wasn't unusual to hear that America started WWII.

Well, for years we've been hearing how evil we were to end the war by dropping the A-bombs. It only makes sense eventually we'd be blamed for starting the war, too.

[GATOR NAVY]

Thanks for that image...NOT!

[David1]

LOLOLOLOLOLOLO ;-)) Love it. Will definitely save this.

[ApesForEvolution]

Iraq should've been taken down long ago, for numerous reasons. Chief of them is the fact that they BROKE the terms that ended the war! That's enough RIGHT THERE! But the UN and all the anti-America types in America and around the world aren't interested in taking out dictators and stalinists, islamocommiefascists, etc. What a worthless subset of civilization calling themselves RATS and GREENIES...

[Edit35]

Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember. It was started by terrorists on 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.

The terrorists started the war against America long before 9/11.

It's just that past presidents (we had more attacks against US interests under Clinton than any other president) kept their eyes shut because they didn't want to upset their phony perception of peace and prosperity.

[demkicker]

OMG - LOL !!!!!!! I cant stop laughing!!!!!!!!

It's hillarious, isn't it? I've sent it on to all my email buds.

[Levante]

Ohhh!

Thanks for the clarification!

[backtothestreets]

"Some claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war."

Not some, many, and not because they fear war.  Bush choose to divert needed military forces from our single most important goal, bringing Osama bin Laden and his organization to justice.  Better awake to the fact now that many of Bush's critics are conservative Republicans upset that Osama is still breathing and free.

"FDR led us into World War II."

Whoever was president when Pearl Harbor was attack, we were going to war.  Japan and Germany had their eyes on the conquest of the USA had they defeated Britain and the Soviet Union, as they had other European and Asian foes.

Truman finished that war and started one in Korea.

There is absolutely no way Truman started the war in Korea.  Korea was a ally, and attacked by communist insurgents from the north.  And why the criticism of Truman for finishing a war?  Would it have been better to leave the conflict unresolved like Eisenhower did in Korea?

John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962.

Eisenhower, not Kennedy sent the first military advisors to Viet Nam.  Had Truman supported the Vietnamese when the French forcibly reclaimed colonial rights to Viet Nam after WWII, the Viet Nam War would probably never have occurred, and Viet Nam would probably never have become a communist nation as North Viet Nam did not turn communist until Truman sided with the French.

Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent.

Since when do we need UN or French approval?  If you're going to tag Clinton with that, might as well tag G W Bush too.

President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida.

Afghanistan was defeated, not liberated.  You can only liberate a country if it is occupied by another country.  The same holds true in Iraq.  They were not occupied by another nation.  And if the Taliban and Al Qaeda were crushed, why are reports circulating of their ranks growing?

He put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000+ of his own people.

Last I heard was that the inspectors were UN inspectors, some of who are US citizens, in Libya, while both North Korea and Iran are refusing to allow inspectors into their nuclear facilities.  And since when is it our responsibility to remove tyrant leaders from power?  If that were our responsibility, we would have started with Castro in Cuba back when Eisenhower was in office.