Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

7,500 Weapons Bound for U.S. Are Seized
Associated Press ^ | AIDAN LEWIS

Posted on 04/20/2004 1:06:23 PM PDT by kahoutek

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:41:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

ROME (AP) -- Authorities in southern Italy seized about 7,500 Kalashnikov assault rifles and other combat-grade firearms from a ship headed for New York, officials said Tuesday.

The weapons - AK-47s, AKM rifles and machine guns worth more than $6 million - were found mixed in with properly labeled guns in cargo containers on board a Turkish-flagged ship that docked at the port of Gioia Tauro, a police official said.


(Excerpt) Read more at ap.washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; cache; feinsteinshusbandii; interdiction; kalashnikov
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
Coming to a shopping mall near you...........
1 posted on 04/20/2004 1:06:24 PM PDT by kahoutek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kahoutek
Boy is that a mangled article.
2 posted on 04/20/2004 1:11:48 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kahoutek
the qestion is were where they headed?
3 posted on 04/20/2004 1:13:20 PM PDT by alpha-8-25-02 (saved by GRACE and GRACE alone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kahoutek
The article calls them "combat" weapons, but doesn't say whether they were full auto. It only talks about bayonet lugs and 30 round clips. Maybe they were just pre-ban style export semis? Were they just early AWB sunset inventory? Or were they full auto and destined for "bad hands?"
4 posted on 04/20/2004 1:15:12 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lepton
"A 1994 ban prevents the U.S. gun industry from making, importing or selling military style semiautomatic weapons because."

I KNOW that was written by a liberal.....

5 posted on 04/20/2004 1:16:13 PM PDT by kahoutek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kahoutek
Nah, what they got was a shipment of Curio & relics (SKS's & Mausers) and some Romanian AK's that are used as parts rifles...

The real AK's were brought into the states via China (PolyTech & Norinko) when BJ billy bob was in the Oral office...
6 posted on 04/20/2004 1:16:14 PM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kahoutek
Big deal. I thought they found WMDs or something judging by the title.

This was the annoying part... "But that law expires in September." You can almost feel the fear the writer has that someone might be able to buy "combat grade weapons" after the ban expires. Sheesh. Grow up libs. I bet the writer of this has steak knives in their kitchen more dangerous that one of those bayonets.
7 posted on 04/20/2004 1:16:16 PM PDT by txjeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kahoutek
"The AK-47 rifles had been altered so they couldn't be used for rapid fire, but the alteration could be easily reversed, police said."

I understand that any fully-automatic rifle can be disabled and then re-enabled for automatic fire by a competent gunsmith. And, bayonets can be affixed or detached in moments. And, used clips of large size can be traded among owners.

So, this would seem to amount to a technical violation of the "Assault Weapons" laws, no more dangerous than what goes on at your local gun show. For example, I'm pretty sure you could pick up a non-automatic AK-47, a 30+ round clip and a bayonet at a local show. The only illegal thing is to combine them all, and re-work the firing mechanism for full auto.

Now if the designated recipient had a first name of Ahmed, I'd be more interested.

8 posted on 04/20/2004 1:16:56 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (This jihad has been brought to you by the "ROP"-a-dopes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
> The AK-47 rifles had been altered so they couldn't be used for rapid
> fire, but the alteration could be easily reversed, police said.

Sounds legal to me.

9 posted on 04/20/2004 1:18:33 PM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: alpha-8-25-02
I've got a hunch this was a commercial shipment to Keng's Firearms Specialty, Inc. in Atlanta, GA. KFS has long been an importer of Mausers, SKS rifles, AK (semi-auto) and similar LEGAL firearms. Let's wait and see... the "illegal" firearms may be demilled parts kits.
10 posted on 04/20/2004 1:21:37 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven
You want to bet that these AK's had folding bayonets? A lot of them do. By itself, that would probably make these particular weapons illegal. As for the reversibility of the semi-automatic conversion -- who cares...
11 posted on 04/20/2004 1:24:17 PM PDT by Tallguy (Cannot rate this Reserve Freepers fitness: Not observed on this thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent
"Sounds legal to me."

It's the bayonet lug and the 30 round magazines that make them illegal. Semi-automatic AK47s are perfectly legal with 10 round mags and no bayonet.
12 posted on 04/20/2004 1:24:38 PM PDT by Poser (Belly Girl is Still Hot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
The picture in the AP article shows them without a cut receiver, that's a No No according to the BATFE...I had the same thoughts about the article (Keng's or similar importer)...just a BS filler piece to get everyone wiggy out about the AWB.
13 posted on 04/20/2004 1:24:39 PM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kahoutek
Wonder if my relative who lives in Georgia is involved. Wouldn't be surprised considering his background.
14 posted on 04/20/2004 1:25:48 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kahoutek
Hmmmm. What's in Georgia?
What group would feel they needed them enough to smuggle them into the country?
15 posted on 04/20/2004 1:26:37 PM PDT by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kahoutek
I want one of those 'thirty round cartridges'. Sounds pretty spiffy. The assault weapon ban ending on such a whimical note of 'because' is almost romantic. I'll miss the old ban....sigh.
16 posted on 04/20/2004 1:29:43 PM PDT by Lee Heggy (When truth and logic fail high explosives are applicable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent
re your post #9:

Sorry, read the article too quickly--looked for that detail on second scan but missed it.

17 posted on 04/20/2004 1:36:24 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MD_Willington_1976
1: The 1994 Ban would have no effect on non-modified AKs. These would be banned by the 1989 Executive Order not the 1994 ban.

2: The importation of these would not be illegal. Customs would require that those weapons destined for the use as parts kits until they were demilled (Receivers cut, any necessary parts removed) be held in a bonded warehouse until approval that import laws were complied with. This is the cause of the FAL and psh-41 recalls that have happened, the importer complied with the BATFE requirements then later the BATFE determined they had not been cut well enough to prevent them from being used (They were saw cut which leaves a pretty smooth cut an later the BATFE decided they needed to be torch cut)

3: The BATFE has ruled that once a Full-Auto forever a Full-Auto so even if they have been modified for Semi only fire they are banned from import by the 1968 GCA unless imported for sale to an approved agency (I doubt they would allow the importation of 8,000 dealer samples).

4: The 1986 GOPA outlawed the manufacture of Full-Autos for civilian sales. (Actually it didn't, it repealed the Transfer tax. The BATFE ruled that since the tax was repealed that they would no longer allow them to be registered. Thus if caught with one you would be charged with possession of an unregistered machinegun. At least one case that I‘m aware of was won due to the NFA being passed as a revenue tax so since the tax is no longer required there is no requirement to register. )
18 posted on 04/20/2004 2:00:22 PM PDT by Kadric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Poser
Yea, I keep forgetting those details. I was just thinking of the lack of full-auto.
19 posted on 04/20/2004 2:10:18 PM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kahoutek
were all the guns listed on the manifest???
20 posted on 04/20/2004 2:23:41 PM PDT by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson