Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was UN "on the take" in Saddam's 'oil-for-palaces' Program?
Globe and Mail ^ | Tuesday, Apr. 20, 2004 | Margaret Wente

Posted on 04/20/2004 1:01:51 PM PDT by me_newswire

In 1996, after brutal sanctions had wreaked enormous hardship on the Iraqi people, the international community found a better way. Under the watchful eye of the United Nations, it launched the oil-for-food program, which would allow Iraq to sell limited amounts of oil, as long as the proceeds were used to buy food and medicine for the Iraqi people. The oil money would flow through the UN, which would monitor the spending. It was to be the largest humanitarian-aid effort ever undertaken.

So much for theory.  In reality, the oil-for-food program was one of the larger rip-offs of all time.

Under the UN's nose, Saddam Hussein skimmed off billions. He sold oil to friendly firms at deep discounts, which then resold it for huge profits. They paid him kickbacks of 10 per cent. He also paid inflated prices (in return for more kickbacks) for inferior food and medicine. That was easy, because Saddam's regime had the power to approve all the suppliers. He spent some of the proceeds on bigger palaces and fleets of new Mercedes for his goon squads. He also paid out generous bribes to foreign friends, friends who were politically connected and opposed sanctions or military action against Iraq.

It's now estimated that Saddam stole at least $5-billion, money that was meant to feed hungry Iraqis and save sick babies. He made another $5-billion from smuggled oil. The biggest victims of this massive fraud were the Iraqi people.

The extent of the corruption is common knowledge in Iraq, where the program is derisively known as "oil for palaces." And it is a rude wake-up call for people who imagine Iraq would be better off under UN administration.

The UN's position is that it's not to blame for the abuses, and that it didn't know about them until after the war. Those who were there say otherwise. Arthur Millholland, a Calgary oil executive, runs a small company that signed two contracts to buy oil from Iraq. He got out when the Iraqis began demanding kickbacks. He says the bribes were common knowledge among UN officials. "Everybody had it figured out who were the fellows paying the kickbacks."

Michael Soussan used to be a co-ordinator with the oil-for-food program. "The small minority who sought to hold the regime accountable were overruled, sidelined and sometimes branded spies by our own leadership," he said. And long before the war, The Times of London and other papers were already reporting on the "total anarchy" and "flagrant disregard of UN Security Council resolutions" that prevailed.

Were UN officials on the take as well? The oil-for-food program (which itself raked in huge commissions for its administrative work) was run by Benon Sevan, a senior official who is close to Kofi Annan. There are suggestions (denied by Mr. Sevan) that he, too, was on the take, and his name appears in an Iraqi list of oil giveaways that are alleged to have been bestowed on friends of the regime. Even Mr. Annan's son, Kojo, is connected to this mess. He did consulting work for a large Swiss firm that landed a big contract with the program.

But the real stinker is the leading role played by Chinese, French and especially Russian firms, which made out like bandits. One leading French beneficiary is politically close to French Prime Minister Jacques Chirac. You may recall that these nations strongly opposed any military action against Iraq. And now they strongly oppose any investigation into the oil-for-food scandal.

Kofi Annan has finally caved in to demands for an inquiry, and has asked Paul Volcker, the former U.S. Federal Reserve chairman, to lead it. Mr. Volcker has not said yes, yet. Word is that he's holding out until he thinks he'll get some co-operation.

Meantime, Iraq's Governing Council has hired some international experts to conduct its own investigation. Among them is a prominent London-based management consultant, Claude Hankes-Drielsma. Last month, in a scathing letter to Mr. Annan, he called the oil-for-food program "one of the world's most disgraceful scams." He also said that "based on the facts as I know them at the present time, the UN failed in its responsibility to the Iraqi people and the international community at large."

At best, the UN is guilty of gross mismanagement. At worst, it's guilty of colluding with one of the most bloodthirsty tyrants of all time

___________________________________________________

See current Middle East News links at Mideast Newswire:

www.mideastnewswire.com

____________________________________________________________



TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: arab; arabs; corruption; islam; israel; israeli; jew; kofiannan; koran; middleeastnews; mideastnewswire; oilforfood; oilforfoodprogram; palestinian; rightofreturn; sevan; sharon; terrorism; un; unitednations

1 posted on 04/20/2004 1:01:53 PM PDT by me_newswire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: me_newswire
Yes
2 posted on 04/20/2004 1:04:47 PM PDT by day10 (When you come near the human race you get layers and layers of nonsense.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: me_newswire
"Was UN On The Take..."

DUH!
3 posted on 04/20/2004 1:12:33 PM PDT by vanmorrison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vanmorrison
BTTT
4 posted on 04/20/2004 1:15:27 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dixi Veritas
ping

Good summary of the situation.
5 posted on 04/20/2004 1:21:06 PM PDT by Bilbo Baggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bilbo Baggins
The UN is worthless. Now it's corrupt?
6 posted on 04/20/2004 1:27:22 PM PDT by Therapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: me_newswire
Yes. Kofi and his son Koko were some of the main benificiaries of Saddam's oil money.
7 posted on 04/20/2004 1:28:32 PM PDT by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: me_newswire
In a nutshell? YES! Can still remember at the 2001 Beirut Conference of Islamic Leaders where the awful road map to peace was developed without any Israeli, European or US input. There was Kofi Annan and Saddam Hussein posing for the cameras with their arms around each other playing huggy bear and kissy face.
8 posted on 04/20/2004 1:40:20 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Therapist
Apparently thouroughly, see this post. It's a long article, but exposes many things. Explains a lot of actions of people/countries in the past few years.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1120829/posts
9 posted on 04/20/2004 1:41:59 PM PDT by Bilbo Baggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
We'll see if the American public is smart enough to connect the dots. Since it's just about "following the money" I think that this will be a story that will build over the next 3-4 months and will demolish John Kerry's single theory of Foreign Policy and the War on Terror--give it to the United Nations.

As the UN scandal develops, it will look like George W. Bush was earnest, if somewhat naive, in going to the U.N. to ask them to enforce their own resolutions. Then we watched Bush slowly wise-up and arm-twist the U.N. into giving Sadaam one more resolution--this time authorizing force. It puzzled us that the Security Council with China, Russia, and France conspiring, wouldn't sign off on the actual use of force, so the USA relied on the language of the original resolution as an authorization to invade Iraq.

Now it's John Kerry who seems quite uninformed about the real nature of the U.N. and our so-called allies there. As the standing of the U.N. declines over the next six months, watch Kerry's numbers fall proportionately. Do I see the clever hands of Karl Rove at work again? Has he given the Democrats just enough rope to hang themselves--again???

10 posted on 04/20/2004 1:45:19 PM PDT by DJtex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: me_newswire
Yes, the UN was on the take, is on the take, and defines the concept of "being on the take".
11 posted on 04/20/2004 1:53:28 PM PDT by GOPJ (NFL Owners: Grown men don't watch hollywood peep shows with wives and children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJtex
Ummmmm, the press doesn't "follow the money" unless there's a Republican at the end of the search. When it's their team they look the other way. Have you read the New York Times or watched CBS recently?

We'll see if the American public is smart enough to connect the dots. Since it's just about "following the money" I think that this will be a story that will build over the next 3-4 months and will demolish John Kerry's single theory of Foreign Policy and the War on Terror--give it to the United Nations.

12 posted on 04/20/2004 1:58:37 PM PDT by GOPJ (NFL Owners: Grown men don't watch hollywood peep shows with wives and children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: me_newswire
...Claude Hankes-Drielsma...

I hope this guy's a good egg.

13 posted on 04/20/2004 2:09:45 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Ummmmm, the press doesn't "follow the money" unless there's a Republican at the end of the search. When it's their team they look the other way. Have you read the New York Times or watched CBS recently?

Lately, CBS has become a shameless infomercial for the Democratic Party.

14 posted on 04/20/2004 8:16:57 PM PDT by Bilbo Baggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Therapist
The UN is worthless. Now it's corrupt?

Your upside down, they've always been corrupted (Korea 1950), now they are worthless.

15 posted on 04/20/2004 8:26:30 PM PDT by fella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bilbo Baggins
Odd that CBS's owners don't care about the networks reputation.

Lately, CBS has become a shameless infomercial for the Democratic Party.

16 posted on 04/20/2004 9:19:38 PM PDT by GOPJ (NFL Owners: Grown men don't watch hollywood peep shows with wives and children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Therapist
It has ALWAYS been corrupt!
17 posted on 04/20/2004 9:21:22 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson