Skip to comments.
Committed to marriage for the masses
Polyamorists say they relate honestly to multiple partners
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/04/20/BAGIG67LNQ1.DTL ^
| 4/20/04
| SF Chronicle
Posted on 04/20/2004 9:11:05 AM PDT by Mike the Conservative
Unitarians from Boston to Berkeley have opened another front in the liberal crusade to expand the definition of marriage and family in America.
It's the new polygamy, and according to the Unitarian Universalists for Polyamory Awareness, their relationships are at least as ethical as other marriages -- gay or straight.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; marriage; polyamory; polygamy; religiousleft; unitarians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
We said this would happen!!
To: Mike the Conservative
God loathes the multiplication of wives. It wasn't good for Abraham (with Hagar) and certainly didn't do David or Solomon any good. The Bible demonstrates the social ills created when men multiply wives. Do these people actually read?
2
posted on
04/20/2004 9:13:28 AM PDT
by
cyborg
(The 9-11 commission members have penis envy.)
To: Mike the Conservative
Gasp! Amazing! We never saw it coming! Alas, when is W going to appoint a "Marriage Commission" to figure out how this could have Surprised Us So!!!!
3
posted on
04/20/2004 9:13:35 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: Mike the Conservative; biblewonk
We said this would happen!!Yes.
Beastiality is getting closer all the time.
4
posted on
04/20/2004 9:14:51 AM PDT
by
newgeezer
(fundamentalist, regarding the Constitution AND the Holy Bible, i.e. words mean things!)
To: Mike the Conservative
NAMBLA can't be far behind.
5
posted on
04/20/2004 9:15:04 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(This jihad has been brought to you by the "ROP"-a-dopes.)
To: Mike the Conservative
Where's the Santorum Alert? :^)
6
posted on
04/20/2004 9:15:08 AM PDT
by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON)
To: little jeremiah
Ping
7
posted on
04/20/2004 9:16:47 AM PDT
by
EdReform
To: TheDon
I want to marry my Irish Setter! She is so cute and red headed.
To: Mike the Conservative
This helps us a GREAT deal, when these kinds of calls come for "equality in marriage". By that logic, considering how polygamy has been FAR more acceptable world wide and IS legal in a number of countries, polygamists should get the right to legal marriage/have the right to be recognized. That is, IF marriage as we know it is re-written by the government.
This is what opens up the eyes of the complacent. THIS is what will happen if we redefine marriage as more than "one man, one woman"...
9
posted on
04/20/2004 9:18:34 AM PDT
by
dandelion
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: TheDon
Senator Santorum is entitled to an apololgy.
To: newgeezer
Beastiality is getting closer all the time. Then poly-homy-pedo-beastiality. "Nice puppy".
12
posted on
04/20/2004 9:24:35 AM PDT
by
biblewonk
(The only book worth reading, and reading, and reading.)
To: dandelion
Actually, it would help if a variety of serious degenerate calls would come in quick order. "Society" is more likely to rebel against all this nonsense if it's quick and overwhelming. Otherwise it's just the frog being boiled slowly.
And let us FURTHER define:
1 man and 1 *unrelated* woman.
Don't open that door, either.
13
posted on
04/20/2004 9:25:49 AM PDT
by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common Sense is an Uncommon Virtue)
To: Motherbear
Actually, that may be a good way to make men hate the idea of polygamy.....
14
posted on
04/20/2004 9:26:37 AM PDT
by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common Sense is an Uncommon Virtue)
To: Mike the Conservative
I'm still waiting for Rick Santorum to receive the multiple public apologies he is due.
To: Mike the Conservative
"Slouching to Gomorrah"- Bork...
16
posted on
04/20/2004 9:43:12 AM PDT
by
hosepipe
To: King Black Robe; Semper Paratus
What about Rick Santorum? Please tell this ignoramus.
17
posted on
04/20/2004 9:49:20 AM PDT
by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common Sense is an Uncommon Virtue)
To: Mike the Conservative
Bump. Bump. Bump. Bump. Bump. Bump. Rest.
18
posted on
04/20/2004 9:51:24 AM PDT
by
SevenDaysInMay
(Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
To: Motherbear
Who says it is only one man - many women. By definition it is multiple men and multiple women. Figure out child support from that :) )
19
posted on
04/20/2004 9:53:34 AM PDT
by
Godzilla
(Native of Tropical Montana)
To: cyborg
When did Jews stop allowing polygamy? Was there a particular reason given? How many wives did Moses have?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson