Skip to comments.
Secret Service: No Oklahoma City bombing tape exists
AP ^
| 4-19-04
| AP
Posted on 04/19/2004 10:48:06 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 last
To: Joe Hadenuf
The log describes footage showing the federal building explosion, about three minutes after "suspects" exited the Ryder truck used in the blast. But she says there's no evidence that the tape exists.
Is not the log entry "evidence the tape exists"?
I certainly say it is. Not proof, but it is "evidence".
To: A Jovial Cad
Oh, enough. Save for my time in the service, I've lived in Oklahoma all of my life, and I can tell you such tinfoil-hat speculations as you've hinted at in this post don't wash here. The man posted an article from the AP sans comment.
True, replies ensued but up to your post I'm hardpressed to see what you call "tinfoil". There IS a record of a log. That is not conjecture or speculation. There IS then commentary that there is no tape.
It appears to me you made a huge leap here to characterize this report as tinfoil material.
To: A Jovial Cad
Rather an emotional sort, aren't you.
Are you really female, rather than a "Cad"?
To: Joe Hadenuf
For an awesome interview by Jim Quinn and Rose with David Shippers and Jayna Davis go to
the warroom archives and click on the April 20, 2004 show. Move the slide bar to 1 hour and 19 minutes. Its about 40 minutes long. She ties Atta and other Iraqi intel people with Ok City. I'm pretty sure she claims in this interview and her book at Atta is John Doe #2. This is a must listen.By the way, you may have to wait a minute or so for the buffer to spool.
64
posted on
04/21/2004 2:23:18 PM PDT
by
tang-soo
To: cyncooper
not really jovial either
To: TigersEye
Thank you for doing everything possible to expose the lies.
These (often government paid) shills used to get away with misdirection by accusing everyone of needing tin-foil using the art of ridicule.
It now has become obvious that they are the ones who belong in the traitor's shoes, or at least the shoes of those to whom truth is anathema.
Just how do we know that THEY are not Iraqi sympathizers who want desperately to obscure whatever can now be hidden?
66
posted on
04/21/2004 3:43:50 PM PDT
by
Spirited
To: TigersEye
Well said.
67
posted on
04/21/2004 4:47:26 PM PDT
by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: A Jovial Cad
I have no further interest in debating this with youThat's because you got KOd but good on this thread.
I suggest you stick to threads that are more upbeat, threads that are geared for fun that avoid possible unpleasant, facts and details.
68
posted on
04/21/2004 4:55:28 PM PDT
by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: Joe Hadenuf
*That's because you got KOd but good on this thread*
Ha, ha, yeeah, *foiled*, so to speak, again! The elite troopers of the aluminum headgear brigade chalk up another win over a poor, defeated foe.
Next up: intensive keyboard-to-keyboard combat with some smart-aleck who believes the earth is shaped in the form of a sphere, instead of a pancake.
I'll stay tuned!
69
posted on
04/21/2004 6:02:24 PM PDT
by
A Jovial Cad
(Ignorance is a voluntary misfortune)
To: A Jovial Cad
Ha, ha, yeeah, *foiled*, so to speak, again!No, you were KOd but good.
I'll let the memorialized written words of the thread speak for itself.
70
posted on
04/21/2004 6:10:50 PM PDT
by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: Spirited; Joe Hadenuf
Thank you for doing everything possible to expose the lies. Well said.
Thank you both. I'm not in a position to investigate like OKCSubmariner or others but I can try to knock down obfuscations so that inquiry and discussion can go on. It's not much but I can do it. It does seem very suspicious when someone trys to disrupt simple discussion. Some are probably just know-it-alls others may be something else entirely. Either way their efforts serve ill purposes.
I'll let the memorialized written words of the thread speak for itself.
And for those who read objectively they do. : )
71
posted on
04/22/2004 5:34:36 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(One nation under God ... or war!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson