[Gritty]

Michelle Malkin is rightly outraged.

A pox on these people!

[Always Right]

The same editorial board that has barbecued the Bush Justice Department after the Sept. 11 attacks for fingerprinting young male temporary visa holders traveling from terror-sponsoring and terror-friendly nations (editorial, June 6, 2002); temporarily detaining asylum seekers from high-risk countries for background screening (editorial, Dec. 28, 2002); and sending undercover agents to investigate mosques suspected of supporting terrorism (editorial, May 31, 2002) now expects us to believe it would have applauded Bush for his vigilance if he had swiftly ordered airport security officials to stop thousands of young Middle Eastern men at airports during the summer of 2001 on the basis of an ill-defined threat.

Pretty well sums it up. And let's not forget the numerous editorials they have written against Guantanamo Bay .

[stylin_geek]

I do believe the Ann Coulter rule is in effect for Michelle Malkin. So...

[cwb]

"In addition to the Phoenix memo, Bush critics have resurrected Minnesota-based FBI agent Coleen Rowley's May 2002 memo complaining about legal barriers to searching terrorist suspect Zacarias Moussaoui's laptop and residence."

Poor, sniveling liberals don't even realize that the Mossaoui case was a text-book example of the FISA legislation that they championed for decades. They got exactly what they wanted...and more, with the addition of the Gorelick memorandum that even went "beyond what was legally required" so not to give any perceptions of "impropriety." Make up your minds.

[Stultis]

Bump!

[jcb8199]

Why live in reality when you can reinvent or make it up?